My idea, possible or not?

Okay, I have this future goal, it involves the adult entertainment industry, so it might be a bit iffy for the more conservative types. I'd just like your opinions, suggestions and comments on the subject.

Considering there has not been an indoor "Adult Theme Park" or "XXX Theme Park" before, at least, not in the United States; I am planning on creating one. I currently haven't decided on the rides yet, but the main purpose of the theme park is quite simply sex. Literal, open sex. To make sexual fantasy come to life in an indoor theme park where partygoers can share their bodies with others. Now, the theme park will be named "Aphrodite," and will be located in Las Vegas, Nevada -- which has illegal prostitution, but does NOT ban laws against conscensual "party sex" or orgies (a disclaimer will be provided for each partygoer to sign on), so I'm thinking its creation won't break any laws.

Due to the theme, before people even enter the park, they'd be required to undergo tests for HIV, siphillis, and related diseases; which will be provided by the park after a partygoer buys a ticket (online or face-to-face), so it'd be best to buy in advance. And, to keep the park's theme, partygoers will have to remove all articles of clothing (except lingirie) before they enter the park via dressing rooms, however, if $20 were added to the initial price, the female partygoer can wear a bikini, while the male partygoer can wear shorts--this is a small penalty for breaking the theme.

Finally, my main audience for the theme park is young adults/college students, but is generally open to the public, so it'd be a mixture between a nightclub/themepark.

Feel free to provide me with either a /serious/ question, comment and/or suggestion.

And, here are some commonly asked questions:

There's no point in testing, really. Let's say I get tested because I want to buy a ticket. Between the test and visiting your park, I go have a one-nighter or my partner cheats on me and I get an STI. The test I've shown you now means nothing.

And then you have incurable diseases like HSV and HPV to contend with. Men aren't even tested for HPV now, and you can't determine whether or not someone has HSV on their genitals unless they're symptomatic. You can get both from skin-to-skin or skin-to-toy/surface contact.

So your best bet is to do what most other clubs do: encourage regular testing, provide safer sex supplies and use proper disinfectants on surfaces. This also helps you avoid a lot of legal pitfalls because it puts the responsibility for safety back on the guest, rather than implying everyone who enters your club is healthy.

I'll actually strongly encourage safe sex and provide testing materials for partygoers who visit the park, it feels much more safer for myself and guests who decide to buy a ticket into the park. I mean, to be honest, many people are rather ignorant of a disease they may have, so I put this mandatory test in place to remove infectees from the park who may infect others -- plus, if someone WAS infected by another partygoer, I'd have a lawsuit on my hands. Or, maybe not due to a contract that can be signed, I'm not entirely sure how that would work.


What about people who like to have sex clothed or wear some sort of fetishwear? What about women (or even men) who feel most comfortable and sexy in lingerie?

I haven't entirely thought about it, but such clothing will be allowed into the park premise.

Good luck with that. A lot of people who frequent sex venues are actually older. Older people also have the money to travel and buy extras, like adult theme park tickets (which, from your suggested clothing penalty, sound quite expensive).

I'll be sure to note that, and due to your help, I'll probably add an age critera for the park (probably 50). Also, advertising would be primarily aimed toward colleges, nightclubs, adult enterprises such as Brazzers, etc in an attempt to reach a younger generation of park attendees.


How are you going to ensure a gender balance?

Funny you mentioned that, I actually thought about that a day ago. Gender balance will be determined by counting the sex of the guest via computer registration or by sight. My aim is to have a 50/50 or even 55/45 (dominant on the male side, I'm assuming) for the park. And, since this park will certainly attract the male sex, it's why I choose to hire more female entertainers than male.

What if the only people buying tickets are guys looking for easy sex?

Due to the literal environment and patrons who enter the park. There's no known way to stop it.

How are you going to make sure you create an environment that's female-friendly?

Spas, massage therapy, female sex toys will be provided by the park. I hope that answers your question.

Have you already checked out the competition (other adult sex clubs/parties) in Vegas?

I have, there's quite a bit. But to beat the competition, there must be something special about my park. And there will be. Sexualized rides (and not so sexualized), national scale advertising, gloryholes, invitation to pornographic stars/starlets and organizations such as Girls Gone Wild, etc will have to do in winning the audience against the competition.

Do you have a business plan?

It may sound a bit wacky, but I'm currently attending college to become a PA (Physician's Assitant), which offers a good payroll for the occupation. My plan is to finish college and strike a deal with the adult entertainment industry to help build this park. They'd be given 20-40% of the funds at the end of the year after payroll, management and other neccessities have been well taken care of.

Know the laws? How will you make sure it's not going to become a venue for prostitution?

I've thoroughly studied the laws, but with security cameras guarding the park, prostitution will be fought off.

If it's a nightclub-type thing, are you going to allow alcohol? If so, have you considered all of the implications of doing so.

I have, alcohol will actually be a big thing for the park.
 
how come hugh hefner didnt think of this one ? good luck with your dream , call me when its up.
 

Supafly

Retired Mod
Bronze Member
Due to the theme, before people even enter the park, they'd be required to undergo tests for HIV, siphillis, and related diseases; which will be provided by the park after a partygoer buys a ticket (online or face-to-face), so it'd be best to buy in advance.

Sorry, after this line, you lost me. Do you actually think anybody will consider having fun but before get this procedure?

Good thing we got this new smiley lately:

:facepalm:
 
Sorry, after this line, you lost me. Do you actually think anybody will consider having fun but before get this procedure?

Good thing we got this new smiley lately:

:facepalm:

Actually, these tests can be taken all at one time, and can take as little as 20 minutes!

((PS: Nice avatar, love the Marx Bros!))
 
u mention female entertainers whom you will hire..what do u mean
i dont know the legal implications but i think legally they cant do more than watch...am i right??

and be careful of underage ..kids....
 
Good idea but can't see it happening, try and open up with a swingers club and if that takes off then expand!

Actually, if you think about it, the idea itself is like a huge expansion of a 'Swingers Club,' but open to the general public rather than older individuals.
 
u mention female entertainers whom you will hire..what do u mean
i dont know the legal implications but i think legally they cant do more than watch...am i right??

You're right, however, I'm certain there are loopholes out of that. Such as making them "partygoers" instead of employees.

and be careful of underage ..kids....

Picture I.D. verification will already be used to halt adolescents from entering the park's premise.
 

L3ggy

Special Operations FOX-HOUND
Do you even have the right amount of cash?
 

PirateKing

█▀█▀█ █ &#9608
If you utilize STD screening then you still shouldn't guarantee safety from infection. Sometimes people contract STD's in the period between the time they get tested and the time they have sex again. You would be better off making the testing optional while also strongly recommending it. Each person may demand that the partner provide proof that he/she is clean and also that he/she wear protection, or they may choose not to (if they're stupid). Also some people who contract HIV don't test positive until a few months after. The spread of infection is inevitable and ultimately the responsibility has to lie with the individual.
 

Supafly

Retired Mod
Bronze Member
Exactly. I have been taking free tests for HIV etc at the local health authority for some years, and they tell you this:

You get the results for something like what is the situation like, three months back.

So really, this concept of screening is not so much of a great idea.
 
In USA prostitution is only legal in Nevada, and it's strictly mandated(supposedly anyway)... so check up on your local laws and definitely keep a lawyer around.

It sounds like somewhere I'd have gone in college... wait, I did... It was called a FRATERNITY!!!
 
If you utilize STD screening then you still shouldn't guarantee safety from infection. Sometimes people contract STD's in the period between the time they get tested and the time they have sex again. You would be better off making the testing optional while also strongly recommending it. Each person may demand that the partner provide proof that he/she is clean and also that he/she wear protection, or they may choose not to (if they're stupid). Also some people who contract HIV don't test positive until a few months after. The spread of infection is inevitable and ultimately the responsibility has to lie with the individual.

It just feels much more safer if I have mandatory testings, because people are usually ignorant of their diseases when it comes to sexual desire -- I mean, they could use condoms, but I just see much lawsuits coming into mind.

If it's really in demand, I might make testing optional. But hey, at least it's money saving if tests were optional.
 
Top