.
The problem BlueBalls' suggestion that is that while "Roe v. Wade" and Common Law in the US protects the rights of a woman to abort a child against the wishes of the state ...
It doesn't protect the rights of a man against the wishes of the woman who didn't abort the child and uses the state against the man.![]()
Ahem . . .
I see my ironic statement was lost on thee my dear professor. No matter. Maybe it wasn't and I'm just in irony overload, or something.
Anyway, I can't be bothered to get political tonight or debate in anyway shape or form. But I'm sure there's someone else around here who will, there always is. So not all is lost.
Happy trails . . .