Good. Hopefully you enjoyed the experience.
And what the hell are you rambling on about trying to explain to me about something Michele said? I said FDR was a socialist and many believe that he was.
Do you have an update on the price of tea in China today? Since that
also has nothing to do with Hoot-Smalley (or Smoot-Hawley), that would be just as applicable to the topic. Well, that's not exactly true. The socialist, Roosevelt, is the one who signed the bill which killed Smoot-Hawley.
We don't need a recap of your post from yesterday. And so my sweetie Pelosi is corrected about the 500,000,000 comment and she just buries her head and keeps bulldozing forward. What's the fucking difference?
I don't know. Seems like yet another recap might be needed. So your defense of Bachmann basically rests on the Democrats having a turd in the punch bowl which roughly compares to Michele? And what you're saying is that while Michele is admittedly far from being the brightest kid in class, she ain't the dumbest either. We're gonna grade her on the curve, huh? Hey, fine with me.
I know you like to position yourself as the consummate Libertarian around here and because you really don't have a vested interest in either party it is easy to come here and take pot shots toward the discussion and then move on until tomorrow. Which is basically all you do.
That is somewhat true: in the bifurcated world of U.S. and FreeOnes politics, I have no interest in playing for the Blue
or the Red team. I'm sincerely sorry that you *think* that you have a vested interest in either party. I feel sadness when I hear people on the left or the right take pride in their party loyalty. I just haven't seen any evidence whatsoever that
either party has the best interests of this republic at its core. It's all about advancing the party, not the nation. And as your posts show, it's also about covering up the incompetence and corruption of the ones on your side by pointing out the same on the other side. As long as everyone is guilty, I guess in your mind, that means your guy/gal is "not guilty"? :dunno:
And for the record, I'm not a Libertarian - that's just another party. There are elements of libertarianism, nationalism, conservatism and progressiveness in my overall economic and social beliefs. But anything that I am wouldn't be capitalized. What is so great about living in that box that you've created for yourself... which requires you to defend someone like Bachmann (or Pelosi or whomever)? IMO, the two main parties are living, breathing examples of what Washington said in his farewell address. The parties and their apologists can't solve
the problem... because they are
the problem.
Learn to think for yourself. Yeah, it does require more effort than doing the old Sammy Fisher copy & paste or being a Dittohead, but not having to follow a script (written by someone else) is better for the body & soul, I do believe. :hatsoff: