Mauled to Death or Die by Nuke?

[zdenka]

If you had to choose die which one? Things to consider:

Mauled to Death
Bad news: Slow and very painful death, as the animal gouges out your eyes, rips out your mouth, pulls off your big cock. That bastard.
Good news: your body is remains. Your DNA can be used in some future science to re-create you. Maybe even your memory can be re-created in the future.

Die by Nuke
Good news: Instant and painless death.
Bad news: Every atom of you will cease to exist. Scientist in the future can never re-create you again.

 

[Asspuncher]

No brainer, I'd prefer to die by nuke. But in the event I survive the nuclear blast, I'd rather be mauled by a rabid Tiger. Radiation sickness is some horrid shit, even worse than the pic you posted. You head swells up like a bowling ball, you bleed from your ears and every other orifice including your radiation burns while you vomit and shit yourself to death.

 

[Philbert]

No brainer, I'd prefer to die by nuke. But in the event I survive the nuclear blast, I'd rather be mauled by a rabid Tiger. Radiation sickness is some horrid shit, even worse than the pic you posted. You head swells up like a bowling ball, you bleed from your ears and every other orifice including your radiation burns while you vomit and shit yourself to death.

Sounds like you've been there...

A third option might be having to read all of zdenka's posts interspersed with Asspuncher's extensive library of witty postings...THAT would eclipse even being mauled to death by a pack of rabid Chihauhaus, Yorkies, and mini-Dauschunds...previously the worst slow death I could imagine.

:drama:

 

[Ace Bandage]

Even in a post about being mauled to death or dying by nuclear weapons, zdenka manages to work in a big dick reference.

You need help. You poor needle dick bastard.