bostero said:


Well if you like that one try the full set!
Lucy in the pool with her boyfriend (Grrrrrrr......lucky sod)
http://www.smithappens.com/forthefellas_lucypinder4.php
Lucy and Michelle Marsh at some awards do!
http://www.hollywoodtuna.com/?p=772
Big site of Lucy pictures
http://www.british-babes.co.uk/thumbnails.php?album=24

Now to have a moan!
I hate sites like this....
http://www.bastardly.com/archives/2...-mary-carey-a-bastardly-slutty-whore-matchup/
Not only is it insulting to the two ladies in question.But they come from totally different back grounds and profession's.Anybody posting replies to anything like these should be shot!
 
regarding that last link - one guy says big tits are a turn off?! i mean WTF! my finger is certainly not on the pulse of 'what people want' :p
 
poggy1 said:
Now to have a moan!
I hate sites like this....
http://www.bastardly.com/archives/2...-mary-carey-a-bastardly-slutty-whore-matchup/
Not only is it insulting to the two ladies in question.But they come from totally different back grounds and profession's.Anybody posting replies to anything like these should be shot!

Harmless enough, you've either got ugly women posting on there who hate good looking women or are anti-porn, or you've got men on there who haven't got a clue what they are on about - because as far as i'm concerned, tits like the ones Lucy Pinder has are one of gods greatest creations.

We all have different tastes and likes, but i defy any straight man to have their heads buried in her breasts and not start sucking away like there was no tomorrow.
 
bostero said:
Harmless enough, you've either got ugly women posting on there who hate good looking women or are anti-porn, or you've got men on there who haven't got a clue what they are on about - because as far as i'm concerned, tits like the ones lucy pinder has are one of gods greatest creations.

We all have different tastes and likes, but i defy any straight man to have their heads buried in her breasts and not start sucking away like there was no tomorrow.

I'm getting at the whole women vs women thing as well as the people posting on it.Why do these people have to set up some contest,that at the end of the day is all down to personal taste.
 
Like the first 2 pictures on that link Civickiller.But the others I've posted just above in the best qualty you can find on the net.

But still a nice find of my Lucy:thumbsup:
 
lol, rage1111 - i agree but dont start this again or one of the other dudes on here will go on about her being a glamour model and u dont want that lecture lol :D
 
The Freeman said:
lol, rage1111 - i agree but dont start this again or one of the other dudes on here will go on about her being a glamour model and u dont want that lecture lol :D
Lecture time! Nah, just kidding. I'm pretty much a fan of hers (especially when teamed up with Michelle), and the not showing everything has become part of that allure. Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see her naked, especially privately in person (as if that is ever going to happen), but the sort of suspense she's built up is far more appealing than just flashing them right from the beginning.
 
The Freeman said:
lol, rage1111 - i agree but dont start this again or one of the other dudes on here will go on about her being a glamour model and u dont want that lecture lol :D

And that would be me then!

Rage1111 said:
She really needs to get them out. It's getting boring!!

Again why do some men need to see a nipple ?
Why if a woman decides not to show her nipple is she boring ?(as quoted by you)
The difference between glamour model and topless model is the same as a lingerie model and a nude model.A lingerie model models as it states lingerie and nude model as it is described skin.Now Lucy is a glamour model and models for glamour are just that and nothing says she should have to show a nipple to do this.

Now if you think she's boring why did you click into the thread ?
Also why did you leave this comment in a thread dedicated to her ?
I think you left this quote because you wanted a reply or a reaction from another member.After all no one forced you into the thread,as it's easier to not click a thread than click on one.It is also easier to not type out a comment once your in that thread than it is not to leave one.

So please in future if you don't like the model just leave the thread without leaving a comment such as above.

Also in future please realise that a woman is a lot more than a nipple.(Oh for your information she has shown a nipple on 9 pictures to my knowledge.)
 
Last edited:
dansan said:
Lecture time! Nah, just kidding. I'm pretty much a fan of hers (especially when teamed up with Michelle), and the not showing everything has become part of that allure. Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see her naked, especially privately in person (as if that is ever going to happen), but the sort of suspense she's built up is far more appealing than just flashing them right from the beginning.

I agree mate, the suspense she has created is a good thing, but I’m metaphorically and literally at a busting point to see her no doubt divine boobs!! When she releases them it surely will be a spiritual moment. Birds will fly and sing, church bells will ring and we will finally have balance in the universe!!!!

As for Poggy1, easy now treacle! I’m entitled to have my say. I’m a great fan of Lucy’s, I just think she needs to take the next step and - POW – let’em out! Basically I’m hot blooded male and I want to see her tits!!
:D :D :D
 
Rage1111 said:
When she releases them it surely will be a spiritual moment. Birds will fly and sing, church bells will ring and we will finally have balance in the universe!!!!

As for Poggy1, easy now treacle!

LOL - classic Rage1111, classic - they would have to be doves a flying tho hahahahhaah :angels:

'treacle' - :hatsoff:
 
i recall the naked one where she is sitting on a stool, to the side, and u see A nipple...
and...
another one from her calender i think, white see thru top with arms behind her head...
and...
she shows a bit nip with red ribbon things around her...

apart from that.... :confused:
 
The Freeman said:
i recall the naked one where she is sitting on a stool, to the side, and u see A nipple...
and...
another one from her calender i think, white see thru top with arms behind her head...
and...
she shows a bit nip with red ribbon things around her...

apart from that.... :confused:

And 7 more wearing clearly see-through tops where you can quite clearly see them.Or even the one on this thread somewhere wearing red underwear the top slipped up to show her nipple.But then again you've most likely only seen the pictures on the web or a few in the paper.

As I say there's no next step,she's a glamour model,not a topless model so she's no need to let them out.It amuse's me how some men need a women to show everything or they start calling them a tease.Or calling them boring as this is all they think women are there for.

What most of the men forget is,most models are very well educated and don't really need to be doing this.This is the same for Lucy,she was at university when she was discovered and doing well by all accounts.So why should she have to 'get them out' just to please some men.After all it's her body,her life and her who has to live with the result if she ever does.
:2 cents:
 
Top