Sexier?


  • Total voters
    2,676
Whatsup with the blurring of body parts on these preview pics?

The "uncensored" photo's don't show her vag.

Adding that little star, or that blur implies that you are censoring her vagina but if you join you can see it. When in reality, the vagina isn't displayed even when you buy a membership

I'd prefer if things we're more honest with the new webmaster
 

Phad

Approved Content Owner
Approved Content Owner
Whatsup with the blurring of body parts on these preview pics?

The "uncensored" photo's don't show her vag.

Adding that little star, or that blur implies that you are censoring her vagina but if you join you can see it. When in reality, the vagina isn't displayed even when you buy a membership

I'd prefer if things we're more honest with the new webmaster

Here's the good news: all that guessing is incorrect! They ARE real slips.

I'm glad you prefer honesty, because that's what you're getting. It's blurred because it's promo. There are three significant slips I found in the remastered set.
 
Here's the good news: all that guessing is incorrect! They ARE real slips.

I'm glad you prefer honesty, because that's what you're getting. It's blurred because it's promo. There are three significant slips I found in the remastered set.

Do I have your permission to post a censored versus uncensored comparison? Because there's hardly anything to see without a magnifying glass
 

Phad

Approved Content Owner
Approved Content Owner
Whatsup with the blurring of body parts on these preview pics?
Adding that little star, or that blur implies that you are censoring her vagina but if you join you can see it. When in reality, the vagina isn't displayed even when you buy a membership

Even in the censored preview pic with the star, you can see the "bank slot" slip underneath. I did that on purpose to alleviate concerns that there was "nothing" underneath.

I can't make a slip more extreme than it was, I can only include, or not include, what I find in the raw photos. I included it. If you think a vagina is too small, that's a matter of taste, the size of your screen, or a misunderstanding of anatomy.

The bottom line is, there are 61 extra photos that weren't in the initial 57 pic release. There are now part of it, and the set has 118 photos.
 

Phad

Approved Content Owner
Approved Content Owner
If you haven't read the earlier post about the changes at KariSweets, check it out.

Since this is the first Ultimate Collection update, I want to keep things transparent about how I work, and what you can expect from the updates I add.

This update is a remastering of a set called “Red Hearts”. The original set was released by the photographer with 57 total pictures, with the dimensions of 1600x1067 pixels.

Whatdidntmakeit.jpg


Here is a folder view of the entire raw set, which contained 130 pics, numbered from 1452-1581. Out of those 130, I kept 118. You can see a red “X” over those pics that were scrapped. The few I cut were test shots or bloopers or blurry. I did not cut any pictures for being too revealing.

130 total pics, 118 made the cut.

This Ultimate Collection release has twice the pictures as the gallery did the first time around, and the pictures are 3000 pixels wide on the longest side.

So enough talk about the stats. What did we find?

UCRedHeartsHot-Freeones.jpg

HOT!
 
Dude, I'm happy you are releasing uncensored content, but I think the stars and blurs are misleading. The truth of the matter is, yes there is never before seen content, yes they sometimes contain tiny slips, but the stars/blurs imply that there is more to be seen that what it actually is. I'm a member, I've seen both versions and it's misleading. It's not a lack of understanding of the anatomy, and if you posted both pictures side by side, I think everyone would agree with me.

I don't care man, it's just some model with 2% of her vagina showing, it doesn't matter... Maybe I'll pay for that 2% vagina, maybe I won't, but let's be transparent and upfront about what people are paying for
 

Phad

Approved Content Owner
Approved Content Owner
Okay Dale, look - I understand many of your other complaints over the years in this thread. Felix has driven you crazy, the lack of updates over the years were confusing, the status of the site has been mysterious. All of that sucks from a fan perspective.

Now look at it from my perspective. I've remastered the content, and found slips. These were cut from the first release, so it's noteworthy that they are included now. And when you run a site, how do you let people know there is something new? With a preview on the tour, and a teaser gallery.

There are slips in these photos. She pulls her panties forward and you see her pussy, so I have to censor it for promo. I HAVE to.

I mean nothing misleading by censoring it - it's a necessity, or it can't even be part of the promo.
 
All good man... I want the site to be a success, I want to see more of kari. I'm not trying to work against you. It's just my opinion that the stars and blurs are misleading. Do whatever is going to help you keep new content flowing, but just be aware that people might feel ripped off when they look behind the star to see razorbumps and no vag.
 

Phad

Approved Content Owner
Approved Content Owner
Let's change the conversation from pussy-size debate to something constructive. What set or video should I remaster next?

I'm wide open to suggestions. There's tons of content, I don't know what we'll find it each video or set, and I think the hunt is fun
 
Phad not to be rude but I used to be a paying subscriber to kari's site, and all this remastered stuff is content that I as a previous paying member I should have already had YEARS ago. I've spent my hundreds of dollars on Kari by being a paying member in the past and all I've ever gotten is nothing but disappointment and I used to be convinced she didn't have tits or a vagina because they were never shown, and I've even bought some of the previous zipsets (like the st. paddys day one) to only once again be utterly disappointed because of no T&A and made to feel like I wasted my money. This remastered content of hers is great and all but let's be honest. The content is almost 10 years old now, amiright? Now tell me. Why should I waste more of my money if I'm not going to see any full on pussy or tit shots? Because that's what I want. Felix screwed us all over, then the owner before you led us on and screwed us over. How are you any different? Most of us aren't going to fall for this crap anymore.
 
Okay Dale, look - I understand many of your other complaints over the years in this thread. Felix has driven you crazy, the lack of updates over the years were confusing, the status of the site has been mysterious. All of that sucks from a fan perspective.

Now look at it from my perspective. I've remastered the content, and found slips. These were cut from the first release, so it's noteworthy that they are included now. And when you run a site, how do you let people know there is something new? With a preview on the tour, and a teaser gallery.

There are slips in these photos. She pulls her panties forward and you see her pussy, so I have to censor it for promo. I HAVE to.

I mean nothing misleading by censoring it - it's a necessity, or it can't even be part of the promo.

I see plenty of models promo's that have full on nudity. The blurs and stars just tell me there is really nothing to show so they hide something that isn't there to begin with. I've been duped before but no more.
 
Here is the best idea I have to offer that would honestly make most of us previous Kari fans giddy and happy. Go through all of Kari's sets. Find all of the slips. Re-master all of the slips, then release all of the slips as a grand finale slips zipset. I'll spend money on it. Then go find a brand spanking new 18-19 yr old model, produce brand new content, start a brand new page for her (like kriskarson.com for example), and then I might sign up for that site. Just make sure you release more than 1 set per week. You need 2-3 updates per week to keep us previous subscribers happy and renewing our subscriptions.
 

Phad

Approved Content Owner
Approved Content Owner
Phad not to be rude but I used to be a paying subscriber to kari's site, and all this remastered stuff is content that I as a previous paying member I should have already had YEARS ago. I've spent my hundreds of dollars on Kari by being a paying member in the past and all I've ever gotten is nothing but disappointment and I used to be convinced she didn't have tits or a vagina because they were never shown, and I've even bought some of the previous zipsets (like the st. paddys day one) to only once again be utterly disappointed because of no T&A and made to feel like I wasted my money. This remastered content of hers is great and all but let's be honest. The content is almost 10 years old now, amiright? Now tell me. Why should I waste more of my money if I'm not going to see any full on pussy or tit shots? Because that's what I want. Felix screwed us all over, then the owner before you led us on and screwed us over. How are you any different? Most of us aren't going to fall for this crap anymore.

First of all, I think the most important point is that Kari Sweets is a non-nude site. It was shot with that intention, and that's why the slips I'm discovering - like in this set - and in the two zips - truly are "slips" and not heart-attack inducing totally sexualized nudity.

I followed Kari Sweets career too, and I wondered and joked about Kari not having a vagina or nipples like everyone else did. I mean, there wasn't even the slightest proof that she was anatomically complete. It was remarkable discipline in that regard. Was that part of the site's success, or something that held it back? People will argue both sides of that. Everything that came out was very strictly sanitized and edited. But on the outside looking in, I could only speculate and wonder how much.

When I saw the first few sets that Felix suddenly remastered where you could see a glimpse - finally - some proof... I was completely shocked that it was being released. I never expected in a million years that would happen. I thought it was fucking great.

Non-nude/tease sites are a niche, and it's a strange niche to explain. When you get into the psychology of it, it makes perfect sense. But it's not something everyone enjoys. Some people can't wait to read the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit issue every year, and flip through looking for the mesh shots and body paint shots and sheer shots, and the moments where a model who is highly unlikely to pose for Hustler is pushing the envelope a bit. Those people who can enjoy that are possible non-nude model fans, whether they realize it or not. The people who don't even bother with bikini pics because they like harder stuff, they're only ever going to yawn at NN sites and ridicule them. I would just encourage people to support what they like, and ignore what they don't.
 
First of all, I think the most important point is that Kari Sweets is a non-nude site. It was shot with that intention, and that's why the slips I'm discovering - like in this set - and in the two zips - truly are "slips" and not heart-attack inducing totally sexualized nudity.

I followed Kari Sweets career too, and I wondered and joked about Kari not having a vagina or nipples like everyone else did. I mean, there wasn't even the slightest proof that she was anatomically complete. It was remarkable discipline in that regard. Was that part of the site's success, or something that held it back? People will argue both sides of that. Everything that came out was very strictly sanitized and edited. But on the outside looking in, I could only speculate and wonder how much.

When I saw the first few sets that Felix suddenly remastered where you could see a glimpse - finally - some proof... I was completely shocked that it was being released. I never expected in a million years that would happen. I thought it was fucking great.

Non-nude/tease sites are a niche, and it's a strange niche to explain. When you get into the psychology of it, it makes perfect sense. But it's not something everyone enjoys. Some people can't wait to read the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit issue every year, and flip through looking for the mesh shots and body paint shots and sheer shots, and the moments where a model who is highly unlikely to pose for Hustler is pushing the envelope a bit. Those people who can enjoy that are possible non-nude model fans, whether they realize it or not. The people who don't even bother with bikini pics because they like harder stuff, they're only ever going to yawn at NN sites and ridicule them. I would just encourage people to support what they like, and ignore what they don't.

I appreciate you taking the time to reply to me. Her "slips" that I have seen thus far and to date (not including ones you surely have) aren't even close to being as much of a tease as say Cute Kylie or Cute Summer, they remained non nude while being extreme tease unlike Kari which was more akin to a bikini model. For example, pulling their panties up between their pussy lips and not showing their gash but letting some of the outer lips hang out a bit. Or wearing something slightly see through but not too see through, it was still non nude even if you could make out a nipple etc. I was enthusiastic with Kylie from cutekylie.com, chatted with her on occasion, even sent her an outfit that she wore for one of her sets and many of the cute summer models have worn for their photo sets. The marketshare for Kari simply isn't there anymore. We've moved on. Kari is so 5-6 years ago. She had her chance and Felix blew it for her. Every time someone comes around wanting to re-market Kari to us I yawn. I'm sorry to say but you've potentially made a very bad investment buying Kari's content. I'm not sure how much you spent but if it was more than 10 grand good luck getting an ROI. Even my former friend Ashley from AshleysCandy.com finally went nude before she tragically died in Vancouver B.C. from being hit by a truck while she was crossing the street. Ashley used to send me valentines day and christmas cards, we shared many laughs. There's a girl I really miss.

When I see promo's for Kari's content I can't help but ask the question of how much longer folks are going to beat on this dead horse (Kari) trying to sign up more suckers as members? The best way for you to get an ROI on your investment on kari's content in my professional opinion is to create a zipset of all of Kari's slips, re-master them and sell it for $59.95 or whatever you want per person who you grant access to said zipset. I work in Advertising and I spend 6 figures a month running a multi-million dollar company and to be honest I just don't see where you figure your ROI is going to come from when Kari fans have been burned so many times and have been pissed off like no other time after time. Perhaps PM me some of your business plan and it might make more sense to me.

If I was in your shoes I'd be investing my time and money into a new model not one that stopped modeling 5-6 years ago.
 
Top