Jail Guard Fired For Posing Naked

[Vlad The Impaler]

Meh, we'll be seeing more of her around here if she gets fired. Which according to that article she has not been yet.

Is getting naked and showing the entire world the new drug of choice for women? I mean did she really think there would be no repercussions over this? Stupid bitch.

 

[Bonezstorm]

How the fuck am I the first one to post her naked pics? What are the rest of you doing? She can handcuff me anytime.

I only had one hand free

One thing to hate about the US. We Germans won't bother about it. There are a lot of German playmates who have a job, even in higher positions

 

[Lust]

I only had one hand free

:rofl::rofl::rofl:

over here nudity is bad bad bad, however violence is gratuitous! yeah i know, not a good trade off

 

[Shadowfax 10]

The jail guard is pretty but I don't think it wise to pose nude when you a prison guard.

 

[Petra]

It's sad to say, but when you take on a job as a civil servant you have to watch what you do always when you're in public. Fuck, if the juvenil jail ever got a whiff of what I was doing on my private time as far as BDSM and fetish stuff went I'd have been so fired.

However, from this article, it sounds like the nail in the coffin is the fact that she has a clause stating that she can not do any other work off duty without prior permission. I know that several law enforcement branches issue contracts with this clause...mostly to make sure their employees aren't over extending themselves (I know several sheriff deputies or police officers that do bouncer or security jobs for events off duty, they have to ask permission from the boss). So if she was paid for this photo set, then it is her current employer's business. Sucks, but that's what happens when you sign those type of contracts.

 

[Bonezstorm]

Will be hard for her to get a job, maybe she'll fully takes over to the model biz. Why not?

 

[Big Poppa Pump]

She is hot!

 

[ai-ni-ichi]

she'd get it

 

[Legzman]

I don't think its any employers right to tell someone what they can and can't do on their own time.

Thats my main argument agains random drug testing. But thats another argument altogether!

 

[greek3]

She has an interesting clitoris.

if by interesting you mean she has a huge vagina then yes.. it is interesting.

 

[~~whimsy~~]

Many jobs have a moral, decency standard they expect their employees to uphold. Sure what the employee will do behind closed doors and privately in their home is one thing. Once they pose naked for general public use it is no longer private and enters into a free use public usage. If it was in a contract or rule book she promised to uphold while working as a guard she broke whichever one it is and is now being held responsible for it.

Sad she made a mistake. However, like many women who pose naked, and do not think it will come back and haunt them. Well she is not the only one. She should of thought of the days after she gets naked in a magazine that everybody knows about.

 

[SpexyAshleigh]

This shit makes me sad. I mean I would understand if she started doing like, full on porn, or posing for a hardcore magazine but Playboy is highly respected for staying classy. If a male guard posed for Playgirl, you know he wouldn't lose his job for it, he may get made fun of, but he'd still be employed. So this girl likes modeling in her free time- it doesn't give anyone the right to take away her job. Sad.

 

[Big Poppa Pump]

She would have to have thick skin (no joke intended) to go back to her work though. Can you imagine some of the convicts jokes. "Don't give me any lip, officer." "is this a labia camp?"

...........I could go on.

 

[Vlad The Impaler]

This shit makes me sad. I mean I would understand if she started doing like, full on porn, or posing for a hardcore magazine but Playboy is highly respected for staying classy. If a male guard posed for Playgirl, you know he wouldn't lose his job for it, he may get made fun of, but he'd still be employed. So this girl likes modeling in her free time- it doesn't give anyone the right to take away her job. Sad.

A contract is a contract whether your male or female. If a male guard did this he'd face the same exact consequences. What's sad is people don't consider those consequences until its too late then blame the system for their misery.

 

[lurkingdirk]

A contract is a contract whether your male or female. If a male guard did this he'd face the same exact consequences. What's sad is people don't consider those consequences until its too late then blame the system for their misery.

Wait, there are consequences for my actions? :eek:

 

[SpexyAshleigh]

A contract is a contract whether your male or female. If a male guard did this he'd face the same exact consequences. What's sad is people don't consider those consequences until its too late then blame the system for their misery.

WAS there a contract stating that she couldn't pose nude?

 

[CurtJa]

I have a big problem with publicly funded institutions instituting off-the-job "morality clauses" in the first place, particularly when the offenses don't involve violence, threat to a minor, or imposition of will on another party. In essence (assuming I were in Arkansas) my tax payer dollars would be funding an institution with a particular viewpoint on morality, which I clearly would not have not signed off on.

I can sort of understand the playboy pictorial as liability with prisoners angle. Then again, if you don't think this woman would already have the libidos of guys who haven't gotten tail in months raging to a boil just by walking around, you're crazy.

 

[Vlad The Impaler]

Wait, there are consequences for my actions? :eek:

You are the exception to every rule.

WAS there a contract stating that she couldn't pose nude?

From what I gathered in the article that's what's being investigated. But I can almost guarantee as a civil servant there is one.

 

[lurkingdirk]

WAS there a contract stating that she couldn't pose nude?

I'm willing to bet that in the contract she signed there was a clause that said something like, "the employee will not participate in inappropriate behaviour." Now that is WIDE open to interpretation, but because she signed the contract, the employer is free to interpret that clause however the employer sees fit.

Not a good thing, but that's most likely, I'd say. People should read their contracts very carefully, and they should protest things of this sort BEFORE they sign.

:2 cents:

 

[SpexyAshleigh]

I'm willing to bet that in the contract she signed there was a clause that said something like, "the employee will not participate in inappropriate behaviour." Now that is WIDE open to interpretation, but because she signed the contract, the employer is free to interpret that clause however the employer sees fit.

Not a good thing, but that's most likely, I'd say. People should read their contracts very carefully, and they should protest things of this sort BEFORE they sign.

:2 cents:

Well, I would imagine that an "innappropriate behaviour clause" in any contract would be referring to behaviour done at the workplace and not in the employees private life. What if modeling is her hobby and a part of her life? So WHAT if she made it to Playboy...good for her! Its not affecting her job performance, so wtf is the big deal?