Is it peadophilia to suck a baby's penis if it is part of your religion?

Is it peadophilia to suck a baby's penis even if it is your religion?

  • God trumps man's law, and God's chosen trump all

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • It should be against the law, the people who engage in this are criminals

    Votes: 17 81.0%
  • I want to have a religion where I can herp a diddely derp

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • derp

    Votes: 4 19.0%

  • Total voters
    21
  • Poll closed .

PlasmaTwa2

The Second-Hottest Man in my Mother's Basement
Do you smell that, everyone? That's the smell of Plasma doing his job.

And also farts.
 

Legzman

what the fuck you lookin at?
:clap: to the op! You sir have succesfully started a thread on a very clearly banned topic that is now 3 pages in length! :hatsoff:
 

Ace Boobtoucher

Founder and Captain of the Douchepatrol
Yeah but only 1/4 of the posts were about the OP. The rest were attacks on his lack of character.
 
:wtf:

Is this post for real? Turning a religious practice into a sex crime.

What is wrong with you!!!!
 
OK. I see what you mean. As long as they do it in whatever backwards, shithole country they live in, that's their business. But as soon as they arrive on our shores, they must follow OUR laws.

And another thing... we need to stop dancing around these little fringe religions... giving them special preferences. I dated a girl several years ago who had a school age kid. I asked him about his Christmas vacation once. He told me that they didn't call it "Christmas vacation" any longer. It was "Winter break" or some such silliness now. I live in a pretty conservative area. But even here, you can't talk about Christmas in public school. But if we had one of these orthodox weirdos come to town, it sounds like they'd be allowed to mutilate a baby and suck the blood off his penis???!!! And anybody who called his sick ass out on it would be called a "Hitler lover" or a "Jew hater"? :facepalm:

This ignorant shit has gotten WAY put of hand, IMO. Waaaaay out of hand!

You don't see what I mean at all Rey, but just forget it, I agree with everything else you said. We live in "the pick a minority's ass and kiss it bloody raw" century.
 

Legzman

what the fuck you lookin at?
Yeah but only 1/4 of the posts were about the OP. The rest were attacks on his lack of character.

Regardless. This thread is still alive and kickin for 2 days now!
 

PlasmaTwa2

The Second-Hottest Man in my Mother's Basement
:clap: to the op! You sir have succesfully started a thread on a very clearly banned topic that is now 3 pages in length! :hatsoff:

Just to clarify for everyone, this thread is not against the rules. If Jenkum pulled this out of his ass at random it would be, but if you'll look at his original post he links to an article on the subject by a credible news source. If you want to have a discussion about one of the topics banned on FreeOnes (beastiality, incest, snuff, rape, etc.) and include a source for it, then we don't mind if you post it so long as you stay within the rules and do not make any statements that violate the rule.

Basically, because this is a discussion of an actual news item, it's allowed under the rules.
 
Just to clarify for everyone, this thread is not against the rules. If Jenkum pulled this out of his ass at random it would be, but if you'll look at his original post he links to an article on the subject by a credible news source. If you want to have a discussion about one of the topics banned on FreeOnes (beastiality, incest, snuff, rape, etc.) and include a source for it, then we don't mind if you post it so long as you stay within the rules and do not make any statements that violate the rule.

Basically, because this is a discussion of an actual news item, it's allowed under the rules.

Also, the mods have no balls.

It's not their fault, they were born that way. Check this out:

http://www.steadyhealth.com/no_testicles_since_birth___anyone_like_me_surrort_exchange__t113376.html


See? It's easy. Find a link to support your case.
 

PlasmaTwa2

The Second-Hottest Man in my Mother's Basement

Rey C.

Racing is life... anything else is just waiting.
You don't see what I mean at all Rey, but just forget it, I agree with everything else you said. We live in "the pick a minority's ass and kiss it bloody raw" century.

Or... maybe I don't. Please expand on your point, if you care to.

IMO, a person should be free to worship a rock or a tree, if he wants to. I really couldn't care less. But as soon as he involves minor children (especially babies) in whatever perverse sickness he's pursuing, that's where I call bullshit. You simply cannot have a fully functioning society if the law allows for special rules for special people. One rule of law... which applies to ALL. It cannot be like in Animal Farm: "All animals are equal (but some animals are more equal than others)."
 

John_8581

FreeOnes Lifetime Member
:wtf: More sick logic from the troll Jenkum :wtf: bringing with it another pointless thread. Congratulations :clap: in wasting my time once again.

Learn to spell properly.. Slowly P-E-D-O-P-H-I-L-E. Got it? Good.

Using your logic here Jenkum, I guess your medical doctor is a perv too. When he asks you to *cough* when he's holding your nut sack - as when you have a hernia. *cough:

Oh and by the way, this same doctor is also present in accompanying the rabbi on this Jewish religious procedure called a mohel. So I guess he's a pedophile as well.

:ban: :ban2: :troll: :ban2: :ban:
 
Learn to spell properly.. Slowly P-E-D-O-P-H-I-L-E. Got it? Good.

The only misspelling he was guilty of was putting the e before the a. He should have put the a before the e at the start of the word. Other than that he was correct. It's spelled Paedophile here in the UK. In the US the a is dropped from the start of the word. Got it? Good.

And no I am not supporting him or his actions of putting threads up with the content that is in them. I was merely pointing out a cocky slightly incorrect response that was put across as the sole fact of the matter which was directed as a certain someone who seems to be hated on here is all this post is. Nothing more.
 

Rattrap

Doesn't feed trolls and would appreciate it if you
IMO, a person should be free to worship a rock or a tree, if he wants to. I really couldn't care less. But as soon as he involves minor children (especially babies) in whatever perverse sickness he's pursuing, that's where I call bullshit. You simply cannot have a fully functioning society if the law allows for special rules for special people. One rule of law... which applies to ALL. It cannot be like in Animal Farm: "All animals are equal (but some animals are more equal than others)."
I fully agree. I only disagree with one bit that you made in a previous post, which I'm not even sure you really meant (my emphasis added):
And another thing... we need to stop dancing around these little fringe religions... giving them special preferences.
I vote we stop giving any special preferences.
 
the jewish ritual of circumcision is done by a rabbi, after the baby's foreskin is chopped off, the ritual calls for the rabbi to suck the blood from the baby's bleeding penis.

Recently a 2 week old baby was given herpes by the rabbi who sucked the baby's penis, the baby died because of complications from the herpes he contracted.

My question is should this be against the law?

Is peadophilia ok when it is condoned by a religion?

Also, if peadophilia is ok in your religion, is it stil ok if the child dies as a result of said peadophilia?

Here is the article,

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york...ospital-linked-circumcision-article-1.1032432




read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york...-circumcision-article-1.1032432#ixzz1o7gab6np

ps, just so some grammar nazi doesnt bitch, i know i spelled peadophilia wrong, i dont give a shit how it is spelled

you should poast this at www.*****************
 

Rey C.

Racing is life... anything else is just waiting.
I fully agree. I only disagree with one bit that you made in a previous post, which I'm not even sure you really meant (my emphasis added):

Yes, you're correct; I should have been more specific. This ultra orthodox sect is a fringe within the Jewish religion. AFAIK, this particular practice is not embraced by mainstream Judaism. Not much different (IMO) from the nutter sects within the Christian religion, the Muslim religion or other religions, which believe in practices that are not embraced by the broader, more mainstream parent religions.

Infant genital mutilation became a hot topic a few years ago. But when the discussion broadened to include boys and non-Muslims, I did notice that there was a push back. San Francisco recently proposed a ban on male circumcision for children under a certain age. And one of the first charges (push back), after the measure was proposed, was anti-Semitism. Yet, when various Western countries moved to ban female circumcision (which in some cases would have made certain adult female genital plastic surgeries illegal), there was little to no push back. The assumption was this was because only fringe sects of Islam would have been affected - and currently, that's the one religion that it's safe to attack these days. But let's be honest, Muslims can make the same cultural and religious arguments that Jews and Christians make regarding male circumcision.

I can't call myself a Mormon, join a fringe sect and marry multiple women. That would be illegal - even though all involved parties would be adults of consenting age. I can't become an Evangelical Christian and join a church that has snake/serpent handling as part of its services. That practice is illegal (every place that I know of). I can't deny my child medical treatment, just because my religion says that faith healing is the ONLY accepted method of healing. A judge will take my child and send me to jail. I'm a Romaphile. But I can't embrace Mithraism and (legally) partake in the practice of live animal sacrifice in the United States. Yet Mithraism is just as old as Christianity. I charge anti-Mithraism! Americans are anti-Mithraists! ( I wonder if that's even a real word?) I demand my rights. I demand my religious freedom! :facepalm:

I'm perfectly fine if someone wants to join (or start) a religion where they worship that rock that I mentioned earlier. I'm perfectly fine if they want to smack themselves in the face with said holy rock as part of their worship services. But when they bash a baby in the face with the holy rock, I don't care if they can produce a 2000 year old document written by Julius Caesar himself, which says that this is the only way to become one with Jupiter and Mars, that practice should not be allowed (in a civilized society).

I don't know Jenkum. I don't know exactly what other threads he may have started while here. I don't know what issues he may have had with other members here. I don't know what his religious beliefs may be. All I know is the First Amendment allows the free exercise of religion. But it does not give religions free reign to do anything and everything that they want, when it comes to another person's physical well being (particularly children below the age of consent).
 
Top