goldbergs streak vs undertakers streak

Which was better? I say goldbergs, 170 + wins in a row while the undertaker wins 19 matches.
 
Streaks really hold no merit when their victories are written before the match even starts. However, Undertakers streak is more impressive because it's a testament to his longevity and being popular enough to be in Wrestlemania 19 times, let alone come out victorious. How many wrestlers have come and gone while Undertaker was rocking out shows for the past 20 years? Hundreds. And Goldberg was 1 of them.

Undertaker > Goldberg.

[/thread]
 

Will E Worm

Conspiracy...
A script...:facepalm:

Which was better? I say goldbergs, 170 + wins in a row while the undertaker wins 19 matches.

Goldberg's streak was full of jobbers.
He was brought in and had no experience and had not paid his dues.
Like so many others who never get a push like he did.

The Undertaker was at least an established wrestler who had paid his dues.
 
I pretty much never respond to these wrestling threads outside of the Games section, but the fact that you put Goldberg's streak against the Undertaker's. Well, that just made me laugh.
 
I'd like to add Fedor Emelianenko and Anderson Silva to the list, nah just kidding. If you wanna talk about a wrestling streak why don't you mention Andre the Giant? He went like 14+ years without a loss, definitely the most impressive, in my opinion. It's something that will never happen again.
 

Ace Bandage

The one and only.
Streaks really hold no merit when their victories are written before the match even starts. However, Undertakers streak is more impressive because it's a testament to his longevity and being popular enough to be in Wrestlemania 19 times, let alone come out victorious. How many wrestlers have come and gone while Undertaker was rocking out shows for the past 20 years? Hundreds. And Goldberg was 1 of them.

Undertaker > Goldberg.

[/thread]

This.
 

biomech

Virtus Junxit Mors Non Separabit
Wrestling is scripted, but it definitely is NOT fake. These guys a real athletes and have real injuries.

It is fake, some of the injuries they endure are definately real. Most are in very good condition, that being said I have more admiration for Brock Lesnar because of his MMA career than his WWE career. In MMA you know you are going to get hurt.
 
Why is there still an argument over whether or not it's fake? It's fake and if you still believe it's real then you need to grow up and get over it, I've been a fan since I was like 2 years old and I knew it was fake since I was like 6, I still watched cause the attitude era entertained the hell outta me.

If you get injured in WWE, it's because you either a) fucked up and took the move wrong/ landed incorrectly. b) your opponent fucked up and made you land awkwardly. c) You took a really huge bump/fall Vic Grimes and New Jack style, which never happens in WWE to begin with cause apparently only Shane-o-Mac (and another person I can't remember) has the balls to take a fall that high.
 
Top