FreeOnes blocked by Facebook

Facebook makes you sign a user agreement that basically states they own Facebook and all the content, you are only borrowing space and they can do whatever the heck they wont. including spy on you and sell information to advertisers.

some people get block for no reason, I'm a friend of harvey spencer and she post some pretty hot pics. Ive seen people ****** for less. But i've also seen pages repeatedly keep posting nudity. I even had a facebook friend finally get ******, every morning she actual posted porn clips. so it's kind of unfair but facebook does whatever they want.
 
acenionX said:
Facebook makes you sign a user agreement that basically states they own Facebook and all the content, you are only borrowing space and they can do whatever the heck they wont. including spy on you and sell information to advertisers.

some people get block for no reason, I'm a friend of harvey spencer and she post some pretty hot pics. Ive seen people ****** for less. But i've also seen pages repeatedly keep posting nudity. I even had a facebook friend finally get ******, every morning she actual posted porn clips. so it's kind of unfair but facebook does whatever they want.
Click to expand...

Yeah I'm kind of amazed sometimes with what they do and don't allow on Facebook. I think part of it is just what they do or don't notice. If someone happens to report your page, or the almighty Facebook Gods happen to come across your profile, they might peek around and decide to take issue, while everything else gets left alone. In other words, if it's under their radar, better watch out.

Yet of course like I said in a previous post, somehow SG manages to stick around, and they straight up post links to their website with their photos. Maybe it's just because they're such a big company? Or... Something else? Don't know.

And yeah, I've seen actual full nudity posted on Facebook before, usually because some guy decided to post it rather than the girl herself, and it's usually to an outside source, not of a girl who's actually on Facebook.
 
sorry i spelled your name wrong Harley Spencer but just this morning i had a facebook friend post a clip from xvideo straight porn. it will probably be removed soon but they will not get blocked. I tried to make a profile under my business name for interactive design and it go blocked for being an alias.
 
acenionX said:
Facebook makes you sign a user agreement that basically states they own Facebook and all the content, you are only borrowing space and they can do whatever the heck they wont. including spy on you and sell information to advertisers.

some people get block for no reason, I'm a friend of harvey spencer and she post some pretty hot pics. Ive seen people ****** for less. But i've also seen pages repeatedly keep posting nudity. I even had a facebook friend finally get ******, every morning she actual posted porn clips. so it's kind of unfair but facebook does whatever they want.
Click to expand...


Both good reasons to boycott Facebook.

Sites should not use Facebook only for their comment section.

It's time to make Facebook an obsolete site.



Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg buys 700 acres of Hawaiian island to use as a private*getaway

Premium Link Upgrade


:facepalm: Make him have to sell his island.
 
Harley Spencer said:
Hey now, I actually like Facebook. It's the only way I'm able to keep in touch with my ****** these days and see what they're up to. I **** talking on the phone, and I don't care to be texting anyone all the time, so Facebook it is.
Click to expand...

Looking at how many people in the industry do biz on it, of course, you gotta be there! All those conventions, summits etc, the organisation and the aftermath, it's all done there.

Oh, just sent you a friendship request. I am Claus ;)
 
Harley Spencer said:
Yet of course like I said in a previous post, somehow SG manages to stick around, and they straight up post links to their website with their photos. Maybe it's just because they're such a big company? Or... Something else? Don't know.
Click to expand...

I could be remembering wrong but I thought I heard years ago from several people that one of the people at SG "knows someone" on FB staff.. IDK.
GodsGirls Facebook was deleted repeatedly even though they kept it way more tame to follow rules.

It never makes sense.
I get that keeping track of everything on a gigantic site is nearly impossible, but obviously they have a **** load of resources and regularly use them to remove the wrong people.
It's kind of blatantly clear that they like to be choosy about when and who they re-enforce their rules against.
Like ok, I can't use my stage name.. does that mean Charlie Sheen would have to go by Carlos Estevez on Facebook? :P I fucking doubt it.
 
Ari Dee said:
I could be remembering wrong but I thought I heard years ago from several people that one of the people at SG "knows someone" on FB staff.. IDK.
GodsGirls Facebook was deleted repeatedly even though they kept it way more tame to follow rules.

It never makes sense.
I get that keeping track of everything on a gigantic site is nearly impossible, but obviously they have a **** load of resources and regularly use them to remove the wrong people.
It's kind of blatantly clear that they like to be choosy about when and who they re-enforce their rules against.
Like ok, I can't use my stage name.. does that mean Charlie Sheen would have to go by Carlos Estevez on Facebook? :P I fucking doubt it.
Click to expand...

Yep very true. I don't agree with it either, but... It is what it is. Hopefully I don't someday get the boot.
 
This is one of those topics I have a hard time handling.

On one hand (the obvious one), I can see why Facebook would block FreeOnes - it is porn-related which ******** their content policy. On the other hand, I call "bullshit." If Facebook is going to block FreeOnes it should be because of a ********* of said content policy, not just because it is porn-related. For instance, if FreeOnes opened an account and posted a picture of a dude's rock hard dick, I could see why Facebook would block it. But, to block the entire entity of FreeOnes before any content is posted??? - I call "bullshit."

On a side note, I respect user-end content regulations on websites (I believe the host of any site has the right to tell me what I can and can't do on their webpage), but I have a HUGE problem with Facebook singling out certain accounts and/or posts and blocking them, especially when their decisions are completely inconsistent. One of my friends on Facebook cooooonstantly shares pictures of nearly naked women (some of which are actually naked, just 'covered up' with their hands or whatever), all of which are shared from another Facebook page that is dedicated to those types of pictures, but Facebook has never blocked any of that content. Yet, they'll block FreeOnes before they even post anything? Makes no sense.

And, I'm fairly certain I'm in the majority with this - I'm more offended by pictures of dead ******* than nudity. How Facebook allows people to post pictures and videos of hunting ***** is beyond me.
 
ChefChiTown said:
This is one of those topics I have a hard time handling.

On one hand (the obvious one), I can see why Facebook would block FreeOnes - it is porn-related which ******** their content policy. On the other hand, I call "bullshit." If Facebook is going to block FreeOnes it should be because of a ********* of said content policy, not just because it is porn-related. For instance, if FreeOnes opened an account and posted a picture of a dude's rock hard dick, I could see why Facebook would block it. But, to block the entire entity of FreeOnes before any content is posted??? - I call "bullshit."

On a side note, I respect user-end content regulations on websites (I believe the host of any site has the right to tell me what I can and can't do on their webpage), but I have a HUGE problem with Facebook singling out certain accounts and/or posts and blocking them, especially when their decisions are completely inconsistent. One of my friends on Facebook cooooonstantly shares pictures of nearly naked women (some of which are actually naked, just 'covered up' with their hands or whatever), all of which are shared from another Facebook page that is dedicated to those types of pictures, but Facebook has never blocked any of that content. Yet, they'll block FreeOnes before they even post anything? Makes no sense.

And, I'm fairly certain I'm in the majority with this - I'm more offended by pictures of dead ******* than nudity. How Facebook allows people to post pictures and videos of hunting ***** is beyond me.
Click to expand...

Oh, Facebook didn't just block FreeOnes because it was a porn site out of the blue. I think it was Miss FreeOnes 2012 or 2013 that got the page and domain entirely blocked when all the models were spamming their vote for me posts. The worst thing is, the actual FO page wasn't any worse than a Victoria Secret catalog. I made sure it only had girls in our tshirts and OCSM/Miss FO fansigns.

Bastards.
 
Petra said:
Oh, Facebook didn't just block FreeOnes because it was a porn site out of the blue. I think it was Miss FreeOnes 2012 or 2013 that got the page and domain entirely blocked when all the models were spamming their vote for me posts. The worst thing is, the actual FO page wasn't any worse than a Victoria Secret catalog. I made sure it only had girls in our tshirts and OCSM/Miss FO fansigns.

Bastards.
Click to expand...

Yeah. Bastards.
 
Petra said:
Oh, Facebook didn't just block FreeOnes because it was a porn site out of the blue. I think it was Miss FreeOnes 2012 or 2013 that got the page and domain entirely blocked when all the models were spamming their vote for me posts. The worst thing is, the actual FO page wasn't any worse than a Victoria Secret catalog. I made sure it only had girls in our tshirts and OCSM/Miss FO fansigns.

Bastards.
Click to expand...

Haha, yeah I think I contributed to the URL being blocked. I think it was the 2012 contest.
 
I myself neverever was a member of facebook, + neverever will be a member of facebook since I know that kinda * Zuckerberg * has stolen this idea from someone else . In interviews he´s getting veeerryy sweaty if there´s any question about it ...
There are lots of other sites you can be a member to, twitter.com for example ...
And that * ELLIE * ...may she RIP .. lool . :)
 
I'm all about hunting and ******* *******. In fact, I had chicken for dinner last night. Now I didn't **** the chicken myself cause modern times allow me to pay someone else to **** it for me, but basically the same.

Anyway, back to my thought. We normally **** prey for food, and sometimes we **** predators to minimize competition, (i.e. coyotes ******* cattle will often be put down). ******* for "fun" is a grotesque manifestation of natural behavior, not unlike ***** porn for example. Sex with other humans is quite normal yet sex with ******** is abhorrent.

These people who **** for sport suffer from a psychological disorder that somehow allows them to see their behavior as acceptable. I think outlawing trophy hunting is not a complete answer. After all these hunters have shown that skirting the law to fulfill their fetish is not out of the question.

I think that until we have a better understanding of these types of psychological disorders and possibly some sort of treatment, the best we can do is publicly shame the people involved. So, pile the fuck on...! :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

BeatMan
The Death Of Liberalism
2
Replies
20
Views
5K
sean miguel
sean miguel
DrakeM
  • Locked
Custom User Title List (the usually silly words under your username)
2 3 4 5
Replies
96
Views
37K
Steve-FreeOnes
Steve-FreeOnes
J
Two best mates and a girl sharing cum
Replies
2
Views
23K
Torre82
Torre82
Rey C.
Porn Star Megan Jones Arrested On ****** Cruelty Charges - Are Fetish Videos Going Too Far?
2
Replies
31
Views
10K
hoochimama
H
24 Grams
Pornography and it's relationship to perceptual biases
Replies
6
Views
2K
xfire
xfire
Back
Top