I am loving your analysis Wallaby....where do you find the time to collate all your evidence (tell the truth....do you commit it to memory whilst you are having your daly w**k thus using positive reinforcement?
)
I am pleased at my progress so far but also baffled about your question of how many categories we all decided to enter ourselves in. I was never asked and always found it a little bit bemusing that I wasnt recognised as a camgirl candidate :dunno:
As for the big debate about whether girls should be penalised for non partcipation.....it is slightly frustrating that Sophie Dee et al have no problems getting through to the next round but then I guess it just goes to show how massively popular they are and if they dont need to campaign for votes then all power to them. I am sure all the girls in the competition work hard to sustain their fan base whether that be through interaction on message forums or just promoting themselves through their work. I am a teeny bit jealous but then I dont do this for the fame or recognition and prefer to keep a low profile so I cant really complain. I do agree that non particpators of Freeones should be disallowed from certain categories to make it a fairer compettion for the lesser known models though (e.g. Best OCSM)
Thanks for the votes Mr Wallaby.....much appreciated
Rebekah.xxx
Aha! So you want into the mind of the Wallaby? :1orglaugh Nah, I can't commit it to memory during my "daily exercise," besides, FreeOnes porn is usually a bit tame for me. WOOF!
Seriously though, I'm really glad that you like it- I hope everyone likes it- and I enjoy doing it.
Rebekah, they really didn't ask you? I was under the impression that it was the girls who decided in what categories they would be participating. How did you not get considered for that? (Also, thank you for inspiring today's open question!) :lovecoupl
I totally agree with you about the non-participation issue: no offense at all to Sophie Dee et al, but my opinion is that it is only logical that Best OCSM should, at its core, be about consistent actions and postings on and related to this board. Put simply, I think that people who are regulars here want OCSMs who are also regulars here, not just blips on the radar who are only here because of or for the duration of the contest. What are the odds that the 3 contestants whom I previously mentioned in the Best OCSM question would be in the top 10 is the voting was restricted to board members of record in early November (i.e. pre-contest)?
Tell me Rebekah, with Best OCSM in mind, do you think it would be better to restrict the contestants based on participation, or would it be better to restrict voting to board members only, since this is the only category that relates exclusively to the board and board activity?
It's always a pleasure to vote for you Rebekah, and thank you very much for both commenting and demonstrating your general awesomeness.
Don't remind me of that drop last year....that was really gut-wrenching. I'll cross mine too.
