Double penetration - anyone else HATE it?
- Thread starter United
- Start date
ninetysixcavy said:
Hmm, you have a link do ya? Do you have anything that you could shove directly up your ass and choke on? Or is this pile of idiocy thinly veiled in biblical rhetoric poorly disguised as racial hatred all you got to chew on?
As Jack Nicholson once said, go sell crazy somewhere else, we're all stocked up here. :thefinger
Last edited by a moderator:
I accept the reasons you’ve put as your own opinion, but I can hardly agree with you on them in general – at least, although I dislike DP too, my reasons are completely different. I don’t like watching naked men (that’s why I prefer lesbian movies) and can tolerate them only if a girl having hetero-sexual intercourse is extraordinarily beautiful and a scene must be very aesthetical. As a result it’s a natural conclusion: the fewer are men in a movie, the better is my pleasure. Therefore it’s clear I cannot like scenes with more men than women. Furthermore – it’s my opinion and I don’t want to insult anybody – the double or even multiple penetration seems to be offensive to woman’s dignity to me – it’s too dirty for my taste. My disliking is so strong that I cannot watch such scenes even if they are with my favourite stars. What more, I think the anal penetration must be very painful and causing pain disgusts me, especially when having sex. Well, I’ve described only my private point of view and fully respect different opinions of others in this thread. I’ve only felt suitable to reply to this post that seems too moralistic and bringing something like racial motivation into the thread.ninetysixcavy said:
Last edited:
:1orglaugh Ha ha ha
ninetysixcavy said:
I don't usually even bother to respond to posts like that, but your use of the word "fagotry" is just completely uncalled for and really identifies the quality of your character. The fact that you would even gather knowledge or facts from a white pride web site tells me that you're not really an open-minded individual.
The thing that opens the door to homosexuality is... being attracted to males when you are one. Having sex with a female, in any way, hardly leads one to become a homosexual unless you have such a bad experience with sex involving a female that it turns you off to them. In that case, I would think there were some latent tendencies anyway.
But not to slither too far off topic, I've done several DPs, and I haven't even had the *slightest* urge to try man-on-man sex. I like women, and that's that. You obviously don't like anal sex- no problem, but you managed to insult both those of us that do, and homosexuals with one quick sentence.
Happy Monday!
H
********** said:
Thanks fox. I think pesonally every woman should be this way. Most man wouldn't jump the fence to go see if the grass his greener on the other side.Most woman loose their man to unfedility because they don't take care of business in the bed room. A man who's please 100% in the sack with some great dirty fucking won't even think about fucking anyone else then his little whore. Man are animals when it comes to sex and a woman who lets her man run her like a nasty whore in bed will stay put. I don't blame the guy's for running off with there cocks hanging between their legs and running and fucking other woman because they don't get it at home. Woman have this tendency of ( once i got my man i'm home free ) . Well news flash, NOT.
My black lover isn't going anywere because he gets want he wants all the time. In the shower,,,beach,,hotel rooms,,,jaccuzi,,,bed,,builfing rooftop,,,and the most important,,He can fuck me in my pussy,,,between my tits and in my ass anytime. I'm a real nasty slut when i'm being pounded and he craves more and more for it. Girls,,,if any here,,,read this and open up your heart,,your legs,,your pussy,,,and your ass and you'll never have to worry about loosing your man to another woman. I think fox will agree
I think that you show a lot of experience and interesting views regarding sex, but I simply cannot agree with what you just wrote. Men who cheat because their wife/girlfriend won't have anal sex or DPs or whatever, aren't free of blame. They are free to end the relationsship, but I don't think that it's justified to cheat because you don't get anal sex at home.michelle_lopez said:
Also I don't think that a woman should do sex that's beyond her likes, just to keep her man at home. She shouldn't feel pressured to do anything that she doesn't want to do. I think that there's a tendency today that many young women think that they have do all kinds of nasty stuff like they see in porn. They really shouldn't feel like that. I think that it's wrong to start telling people that they should do extreme sex for their relationsship to last.
I'm not over keen on DP but this style of porn was an early indicator to how porn was going a few years back, these days porn has lost something in a race to get more explicit and shocking maybe even pushing the boundaries of what is considered taboo.
I liked porn better when there was fantasy involved with beautiful natural women (and i don't mean the women in the How would you rate her? threads).
i think the only place to make that kind of quality porn now is Europe:2 cents: :thumbsup:
I liked porn better when there was fantasy involved with beautiful natural women (and i don't mean the women in the How would you rate her? threads).
i think the only place to make that kind of quality porn now is Europe:2 cents: :thumbsup:
sweetie69 said:Could Michelle be any hotter guys? She makes me wanna go out and take on 2 guys right now
I agree...except, of course, for the "going out and taking on 2 guys right now" part.
Pheww, that could've sounded bad!:ban:
I agree with you. I think both of the couple can give to each other whatever they like - it's up to their shared preferencies. Hating some kind of sex doesn't give the partner any right to cheat - otherways there is a shadow of either violence or extortion, which is to destroy the quality of the relationship - better to put an end thereto in this case.Aegis said:
Last edited:
********** said:Michelle,
I hate to disagree with you because I really want you, more than you could possibly know.
But I don't think sex should ever be about keeping your man satisfied. I don't think it should be about giving him so much that he doesn't run around. You don't realize it but you're giving men WAY too much credit Michelle.
Let me explain. When a man cheats on a woman IT IS HIS FAULT. No matter what she has done, no matter how many years she has denied him sex, no matter how prudish, IT IS HIS FAULT. If you're not getting the sex you want, talk to your partner about it. If you can't work it out, and you aren't willing to live with her, LEAVE HER. No need to cheat. Cheating is bullshit. I've done it, and I hated it. For me, I NEED other women. I have one of the wildest freaks you'll ever meet (she's a lot like you and Brittany sexually) and I STILL need other women. I love so many women I could never just fuck one.
So from the moment I met Julie I was straight up with her about who I was. And she accepted me for that, and she loves it when I fuck other women. I've been with other girls who accepted that about me too. And it works both ways. I can fuck other girls, my woman can fuck other men (or women) too. If they're better than me (haha) that would turn me on. If they're not, it makes me feel good. Either way it's just hot.
Anyway, enough about me. In general, no-one has the right to cheat on anyone else no matter how bad the sex life is. It's a lie, it's a betrayal. I don't hate people that cheat... but I always, always and ONLY blame the one that is DOING THE CHEATING. It's not the other woman's fault, it's not the wife's fault, it's the MAN (or the woman, if she's the one cheating). If your partner is not freaky enough, simple: show them how to be freaky. Tell them what you want. Even tell them you wanna go fuck whores and freaky goddesses and see what they say... maybe they'll let you. Probably not. But if you're not open about EVERYTHING... then there's something wrong.
I don't think "all men" are the way you described them and I don't think "all men" want a nasty animal in bed. Lots do, some don't.
And finally, girls should NEVER open their hearts, legs, souls, asses, tits, etc... to ANY man... unless... and this is crucial... unless they want to. And you should never give a man "everything he wants" unless he gives you everything you want in return. Unless giving is what gets you off.
Girls should be a whole lot less worried about pleasing their man, and whole lot more worried about the relationship in general: how he treats her, how she treats him, whether they are both equals in the relationship, whether he gives her what she wants sexually and not, and whether she does the same for him. It's not all about pleasing your man. It never was, it never will be. That would mean that men are to be pleased and women are the pleasers. That's not how it should be. We're all equal, and no two men or women are exactly the same. BOTH partners need to be pleased. And cheating is never okay unless it's open cheating. If you want to sleep around and she/he wouldn't want you to... LEAVE THE RELATIONSHIP and don't get back in one until (a) you are ready to settle down or (b) you find someone who wants you the way you are - philandering and all.
Sorry Michelle
I still wanna fuck your brains out
And if you're not upset that we disagree
We still can someday
Even if you are... we can still do it
Fox
Well, I think I migth of expressed myself badly or it didn't come out rigth.
I think there,s a little bit of truth in want we both said. My english isn't good so. I just meant that i've seen to many woman being naugthy with a guy when they meet and everything for a while seems perfect. What i'm saying is that most guy's wont change their animal thinking when the relationship moves along but girls do. I've seen to many woman being hot,,dessing sexy and provacotavite for their man and after some years that goes to having joggings suit and then no more skirts and for them the attraction isn't has important then before. Guy,s need a woman who wont let up after a while because they've been together for a long time and the routine gets in. You see it all the time. The first few months,,,the girls are short skirts,,,high hells dressed real fine and perfumed all the time and after a couple of years the guy wonders were that fine attractive female has dessapeared too. So what i'm saying is this. The two are responsible in the fact that, Girls don't keep the attraction on because the routine sets in and they have their man along side them and on the other side, man should voice there mindset to their woman to keep the flame alive. I agree do, that if a guy isn't getting what he needs anymore that he should pack up and leave. Of course talk to your mate before and try to work it out. But if the flame is gone and can,T be revived, then pack-up and find someone who's more into your thinking.
1- Guy,s who cheat ( it's wrong anyway you fucking slice it )no excuses.
2- Girls also have a responsibility to a man because if your willing to dress sexy to attract your stud at the beginning, be ready to continue that thrend once you've hooked him. It's hypocrite on a womans part to bring a man in with sexy looks and horny passionate sex at the beginning only to let it go after a while because you have him. You have to be yourself when you meet someone and if dressing sexy and provacotive isn't your way then don't do it because i'll expect it all the time. If your a girl who loved jeans or jogging pants then meet a guy waring those and He'll know that's who you really are.
Most relationship crash at the beginning because of perseption of one another and even do the intentions are to please, not being yourself just in the way you might dress or speak, is a definate crash and burn down the line.
Hope i made myself clearer this time. Cant beleive who mutch my english sucks. loll
********** said:
Yeah, I really want rep points on this site. Do you actually think for one fucking minute that I give a shit about one fucking rep point on here?
To everyone who responded (at least one of you did so in a respectible fashion), to all of those on here that feel so badly for homosexuals, what are you doing on this site? Obviously you're hetro if you're here, so, I don't think it matters. My idea of sex is what it is; if you're gay and like doing it than knock yourself out; if you're hetro than the same. I just stated that my girl said it was the most painful thing she ever experienced in her area, so that's my conclusion. And the quote I posted should be kept in mind of all the men here. You guys know what that quote stands for. So lighten up, you know it's true.
Well,,,this thread is sure getting off topic real fast.
It,s an awsome thread about dp's guy's so express your opinions but don't stage a war
Everyone make up now and lets get some opinions out about double penetration and if you like it or not.
Fox knows I love it and crave for it.
It,s an awsome thread about dp's guy's so express your opinions but don't stage a war
Everyone make up now and lets get some opinions out about double penetration and if you like it or not.
Fox knows I love it and crave for it.
Aces&Jacks
Retired Mod
To everyone,
If this bullshit continues, all of those time consuming diatribes that do not have anything to do with the subject of this thread (Double Penetrations - anyone else hate it?) will be deleted.....as a start.
Stay on topic and stop hijacking these threads with all of your philosophical, moral and social arguments and flaming that always digress from the topic of the thread.
If this bullshit continues, all of those time consuming diatribes that do not have anything to do with the subject of this thread (Double Penetrations - anyone else hate it?) will be deleted.....as a start.
Stay on topic and stop hijacking these threads with all of your philosophical, moral and social arguments and flaming that always digress from the topic of the thread.
Last edited:
********** said:
Your dillusions of grandeur have you by the balls. Maybe you should take a 100 level course of history of world civ to realize where you're at? It took me a while but I finally realized...history never stopped. You'll see the pieces of the puzzle fit quite nicely. Just keep in mind, if and when al quaeda (or whatever the fuck their name is) drops a nuke on time square, somewhere in between the time you are pleasuring yourself for the fifth or sixth time that day, frivilous bullshit like this won't mean a damn thing to you. And when shrub signs the bill to draft you into Iran, your spankin monkey days are over.
Now that I've diverted this thread far enough from the shitty topic, I'm done with it. I'll let you people get back to what you do. Have fun in your sand-box. Oh, I mean, shit box...
