cometcomma
Banned
I am beginning to think there is a Russian-Trump embarrassing connection that needs cover and Flynn is the fall guy and Flynn is connected also probably. It will take time for it to come out.
A whole lot of exuse making going on here. Oh the humanity.
"Minister of truth"BC has become a human pretzel. There's no way he won't twist or contort himself in servitude to his idiot messiah. The kind of idiot that will sit in a room full of sheriffs and tell them that the murder rate is the highest it's been in 47 years when that's easily disprovable, or tweet that god stopped the rain on his inauguration day after it literally rained on his inauguration day. But a couple of liberal senators referencing a fake twitter account is the real failure.
What do you say about drumpf's lie to protect flynn, pretzel boy? He claimed he had no knowledge of any of this on Feb 10, the his minister of truth said he'd been briefed on it late January. I'm sure you have some more lies to add to the pile.
This administration is defined by lies, disasters, and failures, and it hasn't even been a month yet!
" A couple of liberal Senators"
Sad lonely people.I do hope this comes back and bites them in the ass in a major way. Then maybe the fact that they are a conquered party will finally sink in. I doubt it. They are in full resist mode. Fucking idiots.
I do enjoy hearing the lamentations of their so-called women though.
#conquered
Flynn's 4th amendment rights have been violated.
He is military he doesn't have any right to privacy.How so? As Russia's lead envoy in Washington Kislyak's communications were routinely monitored by the FBI. As a veteran intelligence officer one would think Flynn would have to have been aware of this.
Flynn's 4th amendment rights have been violated.
How so? As Russia's lead envoy in Washington Kislyak's communications were routinely monitored by the FBI. As a veteran intelligence officer one would think Flynn would have to have been aware of this.
You don't know what you are talking about.Nope. You are aware that calls involving certain Russian diplomats are routinely monitored as a matter of routine? Flynn was not the the target of the taps and the fact that his identity was revealed is totally legal under FISA. It makes me feel better to know that the intel community is doing their job
So let me get this straight. The man who came into office declaring "drain the swamp" and at war with the intelligence agencies is now whining that Washington is out to get him? What the fuck did you think they were going to do? Three words: Washington. Always. Wins. You find a way to work with the press and get them on your side or else you get demolished. And when it comes to the intelligences agencies, good luck with that. No president has ever taken on the CIA and come out the winner. Take on the CIA at your own peril because they almost always will have dirt on you. Trump is king of the snowflakes. Can dish it out, but can't take it
Poor Sally Yates..her little plan backfired..
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-...s-against-cooperative-and-truthful-mike-flynn
As I said when Flynn resigned. He's an intelligence officer, he knew his call was probably being intercepted, he never promised anything or discussed anything other than a future review.
Roll up your sleeves libs.
You gotta do better than this to get Trump.
It is time for Mike Pompeo to start polygraphs of the departments.
CIA operatives don't like going to jail. This shit was ordered by the Obama adminstration and likely Lynch's office.
People eventually will talk.
Obama planned on running his shadow presidency with the aid of loyal apparatchiks within the intelligence community.
Pompeo is going to blow the lid off of them.
The deep state is in deep shit.
Moreover, when U.S. citizens are involved in communications with foreign nationals every effort is made to keep their identities private. Identities are only revealed if charges are brought forth or indictments are handed down or their identity is relevant to the case or they are a witness or expert witness.
Nope. You're talking about minimization procedures, which the intel services operate under FISA. The sharing of Flynn's name is allowed under the existing minimization rules. The name of a U.S person can be used when it's necessary to understand the foreign intel in a report. No serous argument can be made that Flynn's ID was not necessary to understand the intel significance of his call with the Russian. His call with the ambassador was foreign intel info mainly because it involved Flynn
1-meets the statutory definition of “foreign intelligence,” 2-is necessary to understand foreign intelligence, or 3-is evidence of a crime. US person information that falls into one of these does not have to be masked
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/1801
Democracy Now! had an interesting interview with Glenn Greenwald on this today.
https://www.democracynow.org/shows/2017/2/16