Does our site name ClubSeventeen bother you?

[ban-one]

The site name as it is very much puts the fear of government into anyone in their right mind over here if you go anywhere near it, though my taste tends to prefer girls atleast in the early 20s and more "young lady" than "girlish" anyway. So on the one hand the name is a red flag, but on the other, I wasn't likely to be interested anyway because I like my women older.

 

[luis1972]

It sounds ******* and could put you in trouble in an investigation about ******** pormography.
Change it, please.

 

[dakdak]

seems pretty conclusive that it bothers people at this point
its creepy

 

[badfella54]

Yeah club 17 makes it sound like you feature girls who are 17 years old. Whether you do or you don't, that's the message you're sending. That sort of thing is ******* in the United States, and that's going to scare off plenty of potential American customers from your site. Now you don't have to care if Americans want to buy your products, and you don't have to agree that the age of consent for this sort of thing should be 18, but that's not going to change the fact that there are millions of potential customers out there who are going to avoid your product because they think it's *******.

 

[Harpsman]

Some of the criticism is slightly ott. So many sites have "teen" in their name or title - doesn't mean they feature 13-17 year olds:dunno:
But to avoid controversy - maybe change it.

 

[Johan]

Yes, it bothers me but it's more than just the name and more than just this particular ClubSeventeen site.

I'm bothered by the whole "teenage trend" in the adult industry, all those girls wore are indeed over 18 but are dressed like schoolgirl/teenage girls. I'm bothered by companies using the "teenage fantasy" the some people have.
I know, it's better to have pedophiles masturbating on this kind of stuff than ****** real teenage girls but still, this kind of stuff makes me uncomfortable. Also, I kinda think that, in some way, pornstars dressed and acting as kinky teenage girls askinf for sex with full grown men are kinda luring some people into thinking that actual tenage girlx are that kinky and actually fantasize about having sex with full grown men, which is rarely the case.

But that's just my personal opinion....

 

[Ari Dee]

I personally think any site/ porn that stresses the whole barely legal, teen thing is gross anyway.
I started nude modeling at 18 and I still never, ever wanted to be marketed that way.

Just find the whole jailbait hook thing to be incredibly creepy and represents a much larger societal problem.

Sure, there are times I admit I've shot/ cammed in a school girl skirt. (Though I'm quick to tell photographers that I find it ridiculous since I'm 26 now. I'm sure I probably evoked plenty of the innocent young plaything act when I was a younger cam girl & model.. but alas, I've learned a lot and a skirt is just a skirt after all.)

It just skeeves me out.
And this is me saying that as a non-heterosexual woman who has watched her share of porn and has made plenty of solo stuff.
I've definitely had people assume I was much younger and then literally lose interest when they find out my real age.. that is creepy and stupid as fuck to me.

 

[RASQ]

Holland is full of these guys apparently!

Premium Link Upgrade

Premium Link Upgrade

 

[xfire]

It's a stupid brand name. That's like me naming a site 14yo Porn because all of the content was made 14 years ago.

bob deserves some rep for that.

Even if the target market isn't the U.S., where 17 isn't legal, there's still the blatant implication, intentional or not, that 17 year old girls will be featured. I'm a little surprised you would deny that, perhaps it wasn't intentional when it was launched but there's no doubt that it's been brought to the attention of the site owners over the years. Just to put it in perspective, I'm not a fan of crackwhoreconfessions dot com, either. If you don't mind being thought of in the same light as them, by all means continue to use the name.

 

[Mr_Stiffy]

I've definitely had people assume I was much younger and then literally lose interest when they find out my real age.. that is creepy and stupid as fuck to me.

You're not fucking wrong. Hot is fucking hot, age shouldn't come into it. At the "too old" end of the spectrum, anyway.

I understand the schoolgirl thing. The outfit triggers a psychosexual response where it hits subconsciously held memories of when we were at our peak of pent-up unfulfilled sexual desire and getting boners over girls at school. But it doesn't mean the girl literally has to be barely legal. I get "innocent looking" but there are guys who literally seem to lose interest at 20.... WTF.

 

[bobjustbob]

So what is in the trailer for this site? Girls licking lollypops, bouncing on beds, skipping rope. Bedrooms decorated with teddy bears and little pink hearts. Ribbons in their hair and having sack races in the back yard. I 've never run across any 18yo women doing these things. I guess they still want to keep their former mid-teen fantasy perverts renewing.

 

[Little Red Wagon Repairman]

It bothers me enough that I wouldn't send a dime in its direction. I would recommend others to keep their money in their wallet too if they feel the same way. When something starves it no longer exists.

What does Holland's age of consent have to do with anything if you're trying to peddle young girls in America? Learn and know your potential clientele so you don't alienate them and isolate yourself.

 

[BusterLoads]

Yeah. I won't even click on any of the links or go to the site for fear of a SWAT team kicking down my door.

I'm not necessarily afraid of SWAT but I also won't click any of the links or the site because it just kinda weirds me out... speaking personally of course. Then again, I'm 33 and just assume that this site isn't geared towards me. Probably for the younger 20's crowd.

 

[Ari Dee]

You're not fucking wrong. Hot is fucking hot, age shouldn't come into it. At the "too old" end of the spectrum, anyway.

I understand the schoolgirl thing. The outfit triggers a psychosexual response where it hits subconsciously held memories of when we were at our peak of pent-up unfulfilled sexual desire and getting boners over girls at school. But it doesn't mean the girl literally has to be barely legal. I get "innocent looking" but there are guys who literally seem to lose interest at 20.... WTF.

I get what you're saying and totally agree.
I understand the appeal of being reminded of a time when sex had a certain "newness" and excitement to it.
Just so creepy when that crosses over into "omg her body looks like she's just finished puberty" territory. If someone is consciously seeking the barely legal look, I just find it so gross. Especially considering a lot of the people who are into it probably have girls in their lives that ARE that age or younger.

I like some bush, hips, scars etc on a sexy woman, myself.

There's not a damn thing wrong with thinking an 18 year old woman happens to be super attractive, but when people ONLY find super young women attractive, there is probably an issue at-hand larger than just chalking it up to preference.
Just makes me think of the same men who catcalled me in the streets from the age of 9+
*skin crawls away*

This is porn, not ********* magazine, there's no mistaking who it is marketed for.

 

[Ari Dee]

Probably for the younger 20's crowd.

I'd love to see the actual data on consumer demographics because I HIGHLY doubt that, sadly.

 

[sean miguel]

Not dramatically because I know there isn't really content of ******** models.

Although obviously 17 where I am is only kind-of ********. Oh, what? I can fuck the 17-year-old girl, that's fine, but ****! I better not take a naked pic of her and then look at it, because then I'm breaking the law! :nono:

Better stick to the fucking.

Yes, in Britain the age of consent is 16. But a girl has to be 18 before she can even pose topless, never mind full nude. I don't get it. I don't really care, but I don't get it.

Yeah, I don't get it either. The age of consent in Canada is 16 and in the U.S. it actually varies state to state from 16-18. I understand the legal aspect of it, but the moral indignation at the difference between 17 and 18? Like the OP said, the name was conceived when 16 was the age of consent in Holland and it's been around for years ... like the Redskins.

And if people insist on making this a moral issue, full disclosure: I'm muslim. The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) took a ***** bride and consummated that marriage while she was still a *****. And the Holy Prophet (may the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) was the most moral man who ever lived. You're not saying he was a ********* are you?

 

[Ari Dee]

If you fuck ********, you're a *********.
You don't get a magical pass because someone has named you a prophet.

I should probably just avoid this thread now, but I will say it was quite refreshing to see so many people on FO be against the whole "teen" thing.

 

[Aaliyah Love]

Yes but there are people here from all over the world, not just the US. I am not asking this question just to you or just to US people

yes, but you DID ask us. And that's my reply. Sorry if you don't like it. Why ask me my opinion then tell me I'm wrong about it? LOL You can feign surprise at everyone's response here, but come on..

 

[Ace Boobtoucher]

Yeah, I don't get it either. The age of consent in Canada is 16 and in the U.S. it actually varies state to state from 16-18. I understand the legal aspect of it, but the moral indignation at the difference between 17 and 18? Like the OP said, the name was conceived when 16 was the age of consent in Holland and it's been around for years ... like the Redskins.

And if people insist on making this a moral issue, full disclosure: I'm muslim. The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) took a ***** bride and consummated that marriage while she was still a *****. And the Holy Prophet (may the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) was the most moral man who ever lived. You're not saying he was a ********* are you?

So Mohammed was a *********. Got it. Spread the word. I'll get some t-shirts made. (I'm kidding. If there are any Moon Jews reading, please don't **** me.)

 

[D-rock]

On one hand I think the overwhelming majority of people know that you don't have ******** girls on your site. Still I bet there are at least a few casual porn viewer weirdos that do go to the site because of that. Lets also be honest with ourselves. Way back when the name was created that was probably a factor in deciding to choose the name in order to get those people to come, wasn't it?

On the other hand I have to admit that it does seem to be going to the lowest common denominator for the sake of marketing. I have a feeling you are kind of stuck because you don't want to give up name recognition, but you might also really want to change the name. Still I think taking the high road and doing the right thing would be to change it.