My brother tells me NO ONE is above getting fucked in the ass LOL!
Have a lot of talks with your brother about buttsecks, do you?
My brother tells me NO ONE is above getting fucked in the ass LOL!
If you want to keep arguing that simple fact go ahead, I'm just going to block you for being an idiot. I don't care if you're an OCSM.
My brother tells me NO ONE is above getting fucked in the ass LOL!
Have a lot of talks with your brother about buttsecks, do you?
I'm finding all the prudes and closemindedness a huge turnoff. female"...because the person stimulating your prostate is also female...
Sorry, I just can't stand guys who are sexually repressed, and are judgemental of those who have a more open mind...not to mention guys who buy into the whole "gay is girly/weak" thing...
Stop it Ashleigh, you just want complete control of your man and you know it!
You want control in the bedroom and you want to control the terms of the break up... I know how coercion works, Ashleigh. I know the power of video! :tongue:
@ OP
I take it you're technically trying to find out if it's considered wrong or bad by a majority of people. To that I would answer yes.
Is it technically gay? No. Will people misnomer or mischaracterize it as such? Yes.
I don't think most men accept nor are interested in having their asses fucked by anything or anyone. I don't think most women are interested in men who are interested in that either.
It only stands to natural reasoning and logic. Most men (and women) fall on what's considered 'normal' by bell curve. As such, most men aren't in need or want of being dominated nor are most women hung up on being dominant.
I believe most men and women view sex as nature presumably intended, for cocks to go into something (namely a snatch) and do the fucking.
I mean, if there were ever a game that didn't need instructions for which you could merely look at and easily figure out, it would be what cocks and snatches were made for.
However, human psychology comes into play then we get a bunch of a-typical variations.
Characterizing the average individual who doesn't accept some of the variations as prudes or close-minded is pretty ignorant thinking IMO. As those characterizations suggest some deliberate thinking on it to arrive at a point of view. That's probably not the case as most people are just not 'wired' (psychologically equipped) to reconcile things like men having a desire to be penetrated, people who look like women but have penises, men who act like women, etc.
As far as the prude or close-minded characterizations;
Well, I once had a g/f who had one of the prettiest assholes I had ever laid eyes on. She utterly did not like having her asshole licked at all. Being a man who really appreciates doing that, it was pretty frustrating even though she personified literally a head to toe pick a part of things a man could like about her sexually.
I accepted pretty quick that this was not her thing and no amount of coaxing or coaching would change that. Even when she did allow it just because I wanted to it wasn't what I expected because I knew she didn't like it and was just doing it for me.
So from this I didn't take it that she was a prude or close-minded...nor that I had weird interests or that she was weird for not liking it. I know there are some women who love it and some who don't. There are some men who like doing it and some men who don't. Point is, it's not anything but the concept of someone for everyone and if you happen to be with someone who isn't into the shit you're into..there is someone else who is.
Hell yeah I do. I wear the pants in my relationships