• Hey, guys! FreeOnes Tube is up and running - see for yourself!
  • FreeOnes Now Listing Male and Trans Performers! More info here!

do you believe 911 was an inside job

TheOrangeCat

AFK..being taken to the vet to get neutered.
Best and most succinct answer I have seen yet to the increasingly lunatic claims of the the 'truthers'.

Shyam Sunder, lead investigator from NIST. (When asked about the claims of the 'truthers' & the Architects et al ....)

"I am really not a psychologist. Our job was to come up with the best science."
 
1. This is from 2008 and a draft report and has been superseded by at least 2 other reports
2. No they don't
3. No it isn't

What they actually say (in both 2008 and 2010 update) is:

''In the draft WTC 7 report (released Aug. 21, 2008; available at http://wtc.nist.gov/media/NIST_NCSTAR_1A_for_public_comment.pdf), NIST stated that the north face of the building descended 18 stories (the portion of the collapse visible in the video) in 5.4 seconds, based on video analysis of the building collapse. This time period is 40 percent longer than the 3.9 seconds this process would have taken if the north face of the building had descended solely under free fall conditions.''

Keep the lies coming though. They make me laugh.

No lies. But for someone who is just a regular Joe supposedly, you sure get into the information spin a lot. You can't just be a casual freeones poster. To know sort of this detail means you must do this a lot.
 
No lies. But for someone who is just a regular Joe supposedly, you sure get into the information spin a lot. You can't just be a casual freeones poster. To know sort of this detail means you must do this a lot.

Lots of posts to respond to. You're behind. Or you're just not responding to legitimate questions. But that's pretty much what's expected from you when your youtube video collection on any given topic is cashed out.

It's about time for you to repeat a link you've already posted in this thread. Youtube videos you've already posted here or elsewhere are welcome too.

Please respond to my earlier questions.

The NIST report has admitted free fall collapse which is impossible without explosives. Bottom line. There is nothing that supersedes this.

False.
 

Ace Boobtoucher

Founder and Captain of the Douchepatrol
Buildings will fall at a constant rate, you idiot. Objects fall at the rate of 9.8 meters/second squared. Freefall is the rate at which anything accelerates due to gravity. They WILL NOT FALL FASTER BECAUSE OF ANY INFLUENCE FROM AN OUTSIDE FORCE. There is nothing that supersedes that, idiot.
 

TheOrangeCat

AFK..being taken to the vet to get neutered.
No lies. But for someone who is just a regular Joe supposedly, you sure get into the information spin a lot. You can't just be a casual freeones poster. To know sort of this detail means you must do this a lot.

This is a great observation.

OR ....

I did this:

Google - 'NIST World Trade Building 7 Free Fall' - clicked on any one of the first five results - find 'free'

That's just how easy it is to refute everything and anything you post as ' the truth'

You are a proven liar, and once again (here and in your surrounding responses), you just lie and lie and lie.
 
This is a great observation.

OR ....

I did this:

Google - 'NIST World Trade Building 7 Free Fall' - clicked on any one of the first five results - find 'free'

That's just how easy it is to refute everything and anything you post as ' the truth'

You are a proven liar, and once again (here and in your surrounding responses), you just lie and lie and lie.

But does he lie?
 
Buildings will fall at a constant rate, you idiot. Objects fall at the rate of 9.8 meters/second squared. Freefall is the rate at which anything accelerates due to gravity. They WILL NOT FALL FASTER BECAUSE OF ANY INFLUENCE FROM AN OUTSIDE FORCE. There is nothing that supersedes that, idiot.

The one who starts name calling is always wrong and does this because they have no substance to their arguments. Buildings don't fall at freefall. That is impossible unless all supports are removed, only possible with explosives.
 

Ace Boobtoucher

Founder and Captain of the Douchepatrol
NO. Gravity is a constant. You cannot slow down or accelerate a building's collapse. It's Newtonian physics and I learned that shit twenty five years ago. And it's not name calling if someone is demonstrably idiotic. See now, you've got morons, cretins and idiots. These were all categories for people with low intelligence before the PC Nazis took over. I've gotten into arguments with cretins(They have better arguments than you), and since I'm a moron and I've never seen you at the meetings I'd just have to say you're an idiot.
 
The one who starts name calling is always wrong and does this because they have no substance to their arguments. Buildings don't fall at freefall. That is impossible unless all supports are removed, only possible with explosives.

NO. Gravity is a constant. You cannot slow down or accelerate a building's collapse. It's Newtonian physics and I learned that shit twenty five years ago. And it's not name calling if someone is demonstrably idiotic. See now, you've got morons, cretins and idiots. These were all categories for people with low intelligence before the PC Nazis took over. I've gotten into arguments with cretins(They have better arguments than you), and since I'm a moron and I've never seen you at the meetings I'd just have to say you're an idiot.

1. shut up with the name calling bit. And stop reporting posts in this thread. You're getting backed into a corner and you're responding badly

b. gravity is pretty constant, so if a building starts to fall, gravity is the rule. Physics has something to say about your theories.

III. Are you deliberately ignoring the questions you don't like, pretending they don't exist, or just hoping people won't press you on the points you won't answer?
 
Please let this thread die.
 
Top