Dead Pornstars, Pornstars with Babies, etc. --- Do you still watch them?
- Thread starter silentfall
- Start date
Re: Dead Performers
i definitely don't think its wrong at all. i personally don't follow the life and tiimes of any model, or celeb for that matter, and don't know who's past or not. it happens to all of us anyway. what could be wrong with continuing to enjoy a performance/entertainment bit after somebody dies. i guess if you were real religious or had some reason to have a moral standpoint like that, it'd pose a problem. but i don't think there's anything wrong with it
i definitely don't think its wrong at all. i personally don't follow the life and tiimes of any model, or celeb for that matter, and don't know who's past or not. it happens to all of us anyway. what could be wrong with continuing to enjoy a performance/entertainment bit after somebody dies. i guess if you were real religious or had some reason to have a moral standpoint like that, it'd pose a problem. but i don't think there's anything wrong with it
mattercatch
Banned
Re: Dead Performers
all pornstar girls are evil, may they all burn in hell.
all pornstar girls are evil, may they all burn in hell.
Re: Dead Performers
Personally, I think that they would appreciate that you still use their videos for that purpose. I don't think that it's wrong...the videos have and were made for a certain purpose. They allow you to visualize/experience a fantasy with a beautiful woman, regardless of status (living or dead): it's just like looking into your old high school yearbook and reminiscing about that really hot cheerleader that you wanted to nail.
Personally, I think that they would appreciate that you still use their videos for that purpose. I don't think that it's wrong...the videos have and were made for a certain purpose. They allow you to visualize/experience a fantasy with a beautiful woman, regardless of status (living or dead): it's just like looking into your old high school yearbook and reminiscing about that really hot cheerleader that you wanted to nail.
I have been downloading a few clips in the past month. I went to check up the name of the chick and come to find out she died in a car crash, apparently cut in half. Her name was Anna Malle. Good looking girl IMHO. However, the fact that she died became a total turn off for me. Anyone in the same boat here or you could care less?
Same with preggys. Have no clue why they would want to have kids after being in this business.
Same with preggys. Have no clue why they would want to have kids after being in this business.
Concerning the stars with children, I have no problems to watch their stuff. On the other hand, I cannot feel really comfortable when watching scenes with dead pornstars, although I like a lot of them (with Anna Malle, Chloe Jones...). I don't avoid them, but a shade of some strange feelings always disturbs me...
However, I don't think anything wrong is in watching them - if it were, one should avoid anything created and/or performed by dead people - movies, books, music, etc. I think there is no reason to separate porn from other kinds of art (yes, I seriously consider porn as a branch of art)
However, I don't think anything wrong is in watching them - if it were, one should avoid anything created and/or performed by dead people - movies, books, music, etc. I think there is no reason to separate porn from other kinds of art (yes, I seriously consider porn as a branch of art)
Last edited:
********** said:They would want to have kids because a lot of people want to have kids. Do you think that porn is such a thing to be ashamed of that you would never have a family afterwards? There's nothing wrong with porn, we're all selling something. Someday it won't even be a tigma. A lot more of the girls you watch in porn (probably more than a quarter) have had babies, and there's no way of you knowing, so get over it
No seriously, Anna Malle is a beautiful goddess and always will be. It's so horrible that she died. Same with Julie Robbins, Chloe Jones, Leslie Glass... there have been so many porn deaths... it doesn't bother me at all, they still get me off, no different from watching movies with dead actors for me... but it does make me a bit sad cause I always hope they'll have happy lives and that someday I'll meet them and tell them how incredible they are, and so when these goddesses die young it is very sad for me, perhaps more so than a regular death of someone I don't know, because these girls mean a lot to me and I think they're incredible.
Anna Malle was also a lovely and wild person too, it's so sad. Where did you hear she was cut in half? I thought she just died of head trauma?
Fox
Just like there was no way of me knowing Anna died until I find out. I don't think that there is anything wrong with porn, but in terms of respect for the child themselves, IMHO don't think they should have them. I doubt any kid (especially a boy) would want a mother that did porn or prostituted herself back in the day. I just think that they should think of the childs interest. Like Savannah Samson, she still down and dirty and nothings changed in her life. She DPs, etc. in her own personal life too. I sure wouldn't want that going on with my mother.
As far as the Anna Malle story, I forgot where I read it, not sure if it was lukeisback but it was a reputable site if I remember. Heres one site that I just found. Just did a quick glance, it's a few paragraphs down: http://zartan2004.blogspot.com/2006/01/anna-malle-rip.html
JCMSVOBODA said:
Ya, I remember some site was posting a set on Chloe Jones as if she were still alive. I think she worked for Vivid or was it Wicked? Either way, last time I checked, her profile was still up there.
**********,
Like I said, I don't agree with pornstars having kids. I would reply, but then you might take offense to it, as you already brought up a comparison of this and beating up parents which had nothing to do with this in the first place. I have no problem with your opinion at all, but I don't want you to think that I am waging war or anything like that
yup she was! Apparently some guys don't think so but so what. The milf idea is cool for me, but not the realistic milf. I'm not actually focusing on them being a MILF at all actually, but just how sexy they are. For example, Mrs. Starr.
Like I said, I don't agree with pornstars having kids. I would reply, but then you might take offense to it, as you already brought up a comparison of this and beating up parents which had nothing to do with this in the first place. I have no problem with your opinion at all, but I don't want you to think that I am waging war or anything like that
legzman said:
yup she was! Apparently some guys don't think so but so what. The milf idea is cool for me, but not the realistic milf. I'm not actually focusing on them being a MILF at all actually, but just how sexy they are. For example, Mrs. Starr.
I still look at Chloe Jones pics from time to time.R.I.P
cheers05 said:
Which I think is probably indicative of your own conflicted feelings towards porn. If porn is such a horrible occupation that those that participate should be discouraged from having a complete, normal life outside of the business, then why do you watch porn? Aren't you adding to the degridation and misery of these poor actors lives by encouraging their continued careers? In other words, aren't you just the sort of person whose attitude would cause a child's trauma? It's not like the things that pornstars do on camera is the only time & place those activities take place - there are plenty of people outside of porn who daily indulge in the extreme sexual antics that are shown in porn films - the only difference? You, my friend (and me & all of us on the board). The only difference is the audience. If porn is bad, then sex is bad, I guess you're saying, or is just watching it bad? And why, exactly, would it be traumatic for a child to have to face the fact that a parent has ever *gasp*shock*horror* had SEX or even had a life prior to becoming a parent? Surely part of everyone's coming of age was the realization that their parents are/were people - yes, special to the child and always held with a particular reverence by them - but still, just people with flaws and dreams and lives of their own.
cheers05 said:
Actually, it was a very salient point - I believe fox's idea (if I may be so bold as to comment) was that there are plenty of people out there who are demonstrably bad parents, no matter what their occupation or place in life, and we don't summarily ban them from continuing to reproduce, so why should we take something like a job in the sex industry as a reason to prevent someone from having kids? Just because someone has a job involving sex does not mean that they are a bad person or that they will poorly raise their children - they might, sure, but ANYONE might be a bad parent, not just sex workers.
And, if your idea was that pornstars shouldn't have kids because they might be traumatized by the way society treats porn and anyone associated with it - well, that's just a crap excuse because you can't chart your life around the way that a bunch of narrow-minded bigots might perceive you or your family. If someone decides to have kids or not have kids, it should be for their own reasons, not influenced by the fear of having a prejudiced society treat them poorly.
It's an opinion, and like I said I respect his. But I don't want this thread to turn into a flame or an argument, just a discussion on the subject itself. I don't think a psychoanalysis of myself is what I intended this subject to be about, because of that was the case, then all of us would be wackos for watching porn in the first place.
All the question is is do you watch porn with or without them. Now it's ok to have your opinion stated, but don't come down on someone else because they see it different, which is why I neglected to completely respond to Foxs response, since he or anyone else might take my response in that light.
All the question is is do you watch porn with or without them. Now it's ok to have your opinion stated, but don't come down on someone else because they see it different, which is why I neglected to completely respond to Foxs response, since he or anyone else might take my response in that light.
