Condoms not the 'Majic bullet' for HIV

Will E Worm

Conspiracy...
Odd, don't recall saying they were the ONLY ways of getting cancer? Just an example where one could draw the conclusion that getting the disease was a result of ones own actions.
But is there 'good' cancer & 'bad' cancer then? If its proven that, for example, you got it from smoking then tough, accept the consequences but if not well, "we're here to help!!" :dunno:

It doesn't matter how cancer is formed. It should have been cured a long time ago. With all the money cancer charities have taken in and all the cancer hospitals, there isn't a good enough reason for cancer to be so prevalent today.

Are you also against safety railings or emergency brakes on elevators?

No. :hatsoff:
 
Why not? If one method of protection (condoms) against undesired consequences (STDs) is a way to escape responsibility for your actions (having sex), why is another (brakes - death/injury - riding an elevator) not?
 

Will E Worm

Conspiracy...
Why not? If one method of protection (condoms) against undesired consequences (STDs) is a way to escape responsibility for your actions (having sex), why is another (brakes - death/injury - riding an elevator) not?

Brakes are mandatory on a vehicle.
As they should be.

Condoms are not mandatory.
They are there for people to use if they choose to.

Even in porn they don't use them all the time.
Sex is not a mandatory activity.
 
There nothing 100% effective to prevent HIV. Don't forget you can get HIV/ AIDS by drug use, having blood transfered (that's what happened to that bloke who played the Predator in the predator films), accidently steeping on a stray needle with the virus on and so on. Eventually there will a cure and a vaccine or both for HIV if there is more research goes into it.


I would not be surprised if there is a religious agenda behind this research & much of Norman Hearst’s research crops up on religious websites. Bishops in the developing world are notoriously anti - condom & promote an unrealistic & moralistic view of normal human sexual conduct. A few years ago the Catholic Church promoted the idea that condoms have tiny holes in them through which HIV can pass!!! To suggest that condoms are not effective is extremely dangerous, just as dangerous as saying, although no one does, that simply using condoms means you can go around & be as promiscuous as you want.

That is a good point, for example the catholic church said that the birth control pill causes infertillity and early death and here in the UK a christian fundamentalist group were trying to spread lies about a vaccine for most forms of cervical cancer claiming that it cause infertility. Why do these guys want people to die rather then having things that can prolong their life?
 

Will E Worm

Conspiracy...
spread lies about a vaccine for most forms of cervical cancer claiming that it cause infertility.

Gardasil? It's worse than they thougt it would be.

It's killing people and nothing is being done as of yet.


Death toll linked to Gardasil vaccine rises



8 more deaths connected to HPV vaccine


Deaths linked to Gardasil


A 20-year-old woman with no medical history reported, who was vaccinated April 1, 2008, with Gardasil and died four days later, seeking medical attention. An autopsy was performed which ruled out suicide or anything suspicious. The cause of death is currently unknown. [VAERS ID 310262-1 (D)]

A 12-year-old girl with no reported medical problems, who died in her sleep of known causes on Oct. 6, 2007, three weeks after receiving a Gardasil shot. [VAERS ID: 297528-1 (D)]

An 11-year-old girl, vaccinated in May 2007 with a first dose of Gardasil, who died three days later after going to an emergency room. A physician at the hospital said “death was due to an anaphylactic [severe allergic] reaction to Gardasil.”[VAERS ID 280163-1 (D)]

There's much more. Look it up.

It's time to take this killer drug off the market.
 
Brakes are mandatory on a vehicle.
As they should be.

Condoms are not mandatory.
They are there for people to use if they choose to.

Even in porn they don't use them all the time.
Sex is not a mandatory activity.

Yeah, but seat belts are mandatory in a car but you seem to be against that. That just doesn't make any sense to me. Are you against airbags too?:confused:
 
Brakes are mandatory on a vehicle.
As they should be.

Why? Shouldn't people accept the consequences of using an elevator in case something goes wrong?

Condoms are not mandatory.
They are there for people to use if they choose to.

So if condoms were made mandatory, everything would be just dandy?

Sex is not a mandatory activity.

Neither is using a car or elevator. If anything, sex is far more mandatory than either of those two. Along with food, it's one of the base directives of any organism that reproduces sexually.
 

Will E Worm

Conspiracy...
Yeah, but seat belts are mandatory in a car but you seem to be against that. That just doesn't make any sense to me. Are you against airbags too?:confused:

I said seatbelt laws are only to pick people's pockets.
It should be the person's choice whether or not to use one.

Brakes are mandatory and it's the owner of the vehicle to maintain them.
Not being able to stop your vehicle can affect another person.

Not wearing your seatbelt can kill you and that is your choice.
I've been in two accidents without a seatbelt and I'm still here. :hatsoff:
 

Will E Worm

Conspiracy...
Why? Shouldn't people accept the consequences of using an elevator in case something goes wrong?

If someone uses an elevator and it hasn't been properly maintained.
How is that their fault?

If they survive they can sue. If they don't their relatives can sue.

So if condoms were made mandatory, everything would be just dandy?

No, and they shouldn't be made mandatory.
Sex is a choice someone makes.

Neither is using a car or elevator. If anything, sex is far more mandatory than either of those two. Along with food, it's one of the base directives of any organism that reproduces sexually.

Well, if you want to drive it is.

Transportation is not available every where.
 
Gardasil? It's worse than they thougt it would be.

It's killing people and nothing is being done as of yet.


Death toll linked to Gardasil vaccine rises



8 more deaths connected to HPV vaccine


Deaths linked to Gardasil


A 20-year-old woman with no medical history reported, who was vaccinated April 1, 2008, with Gardasil and died four days later, seeking medical attention. An autopsy was performed which ruled out suicide or anything suspicious. The cause of death is currently unknown. [VAERS ID 310262-1 (D)]

A 12-year-old girl with no reported medical problems, who died in her sleep of known causes on Oct. 6, 2007, three weeks after receiving a Gardasil shot. [VAERS ID: 297528-1 (D)]

An 11-year-old girl, vaccinated in May 2007 with a first dose of Gardasil, who died three days later after going to an emergency room. A physician at the hospital said “death was due to an anaphylactic [severe allergic] reaction to Gardasil.”[VAERS ID 280163-1 (D)]

There's much more. Look it up.

It's time to take this killer drug off the market.

Worldnetdaily is a reactionary website run by right-wing nuts that regularly posts stories of questionable validity. You trust it more than the WHO???
 
Ah screw it. Either I'm missing some critical part of your argument, or this is just about the dumbest discussion I've had since the last time someone tried to convince me that ID is superior to natural selection.
 

Will E Worm

Conspiracy...
Worldnetdaily is a reactionary website run by right-wing nuts that regularly posts stories of questionable validity. You trust it more than the WHO???

There are many articles about deaths from Gardisil every where.

I just posted a few articles from Google's web search.

No one can deny the deaths from this drug.
It needs to be pulled from the market.
 

Will E Worm

Conspiracy...
Ah screw it. Either I'm missing some critical part of your argument, or this is just about the dumbest discussion I've had since the last time someone tried to convince me that ID is superior to natural selection.

“ If there are no transitional forms found in the fossil record then my theory is false” – Charles Darwin

“What is missing are the many intermediate forms hypothesized by Darwin”
- Robert Carroll (Paleontologist and Professor of Zoology McGill University)

“There is no fossil of the stages through which the remarkable change from reptile to bird was achieved”
- A. J. Marshall (PHD Anthropology Harvard University)

:tongue:
 
“ If there are no transitional forms found in the fossil record then my theory is false” – Charles Darwin

“What is missing are the many intermediate forms hypothesized by Darwin”
- Robert Carroll (Paleontologist and Professor of Zoology McGill University)

“There is no fossil of the stages through which the remarkable change from reptile to bird was achieved”
- A. J. Marshall (PHD Anthropology Harvard University)

:tongue:
Well, this is going off topic isn't it but I'll say one word Archaeopteryx, a transitional fossil.
 
Well, this is going off topic isn't it but I'll say one word Archaeopteryx, a transitional fossil.

Hoatzin's (bird that lives in the amazon) have claws at the end of their wings that allows them to climb trees :dunno: If that isnt a sign of a reptillian past then I dont know what is.


But I'm sure Will has another excuse for that aswell.
 
Top