Cocks touching

[Fresno]

Not on your life.

 

[senob44]

I believe that there are more latent homosexuals doing straight porn than is publicly recognised. That's perfectly fine by me. I have absolutely no problem with homosexuals at all.

I do feel that there are some who wish to place anti-gay rhetoric in statements made by others when no such anti-gay sentiments were offered.

Why even mention it when you "say" you don't have a problem with it. People are people. Stop trying to classify everything.

 

[Member2019]

His comments weren't homophobic.

Apparently you can't read ...

They may or may not be homophobic, but they are most certainly narrow-minded, and possibly quite argumentative where there is really no need for any discussion.
In other words, your insistence on pointing this out, repeatedly, begs the question, "why?" Because of that, people will wonder if you are doing so because you are, indeed, homophobic.

I was explaining why some people may think he is homophobic.

I read no fear or hatred in his words.

Please stop reading other people's words as mine. Please! This is how this non-sense starts, and people ass-u-me what my views are -- not by what I actually say, but how others respond to me.

They were simply his opinions. You two's (especially the first guys') rather strong objections suggest he maybe more correct then either of you are prepared to admit; not that there's anything wrong with that.

See, you're part of the same "problem."

Why can't we leave people be to their own likes, without having to categorize them as "possibly gay"? Seriously!

No one needs to go, "oh, he is, but there's nothing wrong with that." It's far more narrowminded than you realize.

 

[Nomad 800]

Apparently you can't read ...

And apparently you do not know what homophobic means.
From dictionary.com; homophobia:

unreasoning fear of or antipathy toward homosexuals and homosexuality.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/homophobic

I saw absolutely no fear or antipathy in Bigoldowls comments. Thusly, they were not homophobic.

I was explaining why some people may think he is homophobic.

Please stop reading other people's words as mine. Please! This is how this non-sense starts, and people ass-u-me what my views are -- not by what I actually say, but how others respond to me.

Above you appeared to indicate, indirectly, that his comments were homophobic. So my inclusion of your post in my earlier one was, in my opinion, justified. If it turns out I was wrong, I apologize.

See, you're part of the same "problem."

Why can't we leave people be to their own likes, without having to categorize them as "possibly gay"? Seriously!

No one needs to go, "oh, he is, but there's nothing wrong with that." It's far more narrowminded than you realize.

Freedom of speech. That is one right I embrace and exercise whenever possible. Like here.
Just as you have the right to make a public statement on something. Others have the right to pass judgement on that statement. I respectfully suggest if you do not wish to have people comment negatively on your thoughts, that you not make them in a public forum.

 

[Member2019]

Above you appeared to indicate, indirectly, that his comments were homophobic. So my inclusion of your post in my earlier one was, in my opinion, justified. If it turns out I was wrong, I apologize.
Freedom of speech.

And with "freedom of speech" comes the responsibility of neither mis-quoting someone else, nor re-stating what they said. There is a legal term called "libel" (if written), "slander" (if verbal), that is offered zero protection by the First Amendment here in the US.

I have said it before, and I will said it again -- bluntly -- I called no one homophobic!

Now will you accept that at face value? Or will you continue to tell me what I said, especially not going back to read what I actually said? Again, I think you mistake my comments for someone else's, including quoting my statement with someone else who said something completely different.

That is one right I embrace and exercise whenever possible. Like here. Just as you have the right to make a public statement on something. Others have the right to pass judgement on that statement.

But you are not passing judgment on what I actually said.

You are passing judgment on what you think I said. I cannot seem to re-quote myself or flat-out state exactly what I meant to the point where you can just admit you are wholly incorrect.

And that started with your quoting my statements with Fox's, and they were not the same at all. I think that's part of your issue, and one that is quickly 'cleared up' by actually reading my past posts. I tried to re-quote them for you, so you could see the clear difference between my statements, and Fox's.

In fact, in both threads, I stated I disagreed with him that the poster could be called homophobic.

I respectfully suggest if you do not wish to have people comment negatively on your thoughts, that you not make them in a public forum.

I have no problem with people commenting negatively on my thoughts. I only have a real problem of people changing my thoughts so they can disagree.

If you will not re-read my words, then please take my direct statements as the full, real explanation of what they are. If not, then I have nothing else to say to you, and you can continue to tell others what I meant.

People are so blinded by the concept of homophobia in this thread that they care little about the obviousness of the truth. No, it's actually worse than that. People just want to talk about others being gay or not, what defines it or not, what their views are on it or not, and they just don't want to do anything else.

Ironically, I'm the only schmuck that hasn't passed judgment, other than asking people to read my posts and not confuse them with others, or not tell me what they "indirectly mean" when I flat out and directly state they are not. "Freedom of speech" is a defense against neither innuendo nor libel.

 

[GONQ]

Not biting on the homophobic argument brewing, I'll say that it depends on the situation. I find that the more people get turned on, the less "rules" they follow, myself included. If everyone's all excited by the situation, contact in that regard certainly wouldn't be a turn off. As far as watching it in porn, again I default to the situation. If I believe that everyone involved is really into the scene and it just "happens," all well and good. If it's planned and artificial, not so much.

 

[Nomad 800]

I have said it before, and I will said it again -- bluntly -- I called no one homophobic!

I think if you read my posts, I never said you did. But just to be clear, I believe you when you say that you directly called no one a homophobic.

I have no problem with people commenting negatively on my thoughts. I only have a real problem of people changing my thoughts so they can disagree.

Oh, I DEFINITELY agree with you there. That can be most frustrating.

Now, I think this thread should get back to the subject at hand.

 

[Member2019]

Arugmentative to the last ...

I think if you read my posts, I never said you did.

Need I quote ...

Above you appeared to indicate, indirectly, that his comments were homophobic.

Again, re-read my posts. Also take my direct statement that I have never -- directly, indirectly, implied or otherwise -- stated anyone was homophobic. You cannot answer for me, despite your insistence to do so.

But just to be clear, I believe you when you say that you directly called no one a homophobic.

Argumentative to the last ... sigh. That was "smart," showing just how much you are willing to continue to argue. Face it, that statement right there was purposely to try to piss me off further, yet it only exposes what you actually do to members.

Respect what actual members of this board state, and do not keep trying to re-state for them no matter how many times they try to clarify things. You've just shown everyone you will play games. You don't care what they actually stated, directly or indirectly, even after repeat clarifications. Great job and a great start for a new member ... Not!

BTW, I also especially loved this one to my comment that you didn't read my post ...

And apparently you do not know what homophobic means.

Again ... sigh. You just want to argue. That's why you're now on my ignore list. You're arguing with things I never stated or said.

Now, I think this thread should get back to the subject at hand.

Beyond the fact that this is clearly a lie, based on your own posts -- even if that was even remotely true, it's still after you've had the last word, obviously. Go ahead ... I won't be listening (and won't respond again ).

You've "won." You have clearly shown you don't care what people say, but only what you want to re-iterate they've said. Bye.

 

[BurstsNBalls]

Well if a girl touches two guys' cocks together, even if they LET her do it, thats okay.

but if the two guys do it themselves... thats very different

 

[DocPorn]

Not for me but I do not mind watching a hot chick getting double ass fucked.

 

[Smallville417]

Enjoy watching it, as does my girlfriend. A lot of things in porn turn me on, doesn't mean I necessarily have any desire to do it though. One of the things I enjoy about porn is seeing different things than the norm.

 

[jayaprak]

Is there anything better then having two cocks touch while a beautiful girl blowing both of them. It's so hot when the girl rubs them together and I love it when the girl kisses the guy after both of the dicks were in her mouth. Does this turn anyone else on.

A gorgeous girl can satisfy as many as 5 cocks at the same time (two hands, one mouth, one ass and another one heavenly pussy). that should be very great and that kind of girl is outstanding, she should be a goddess.

 

[mrtrebus]

I'm getting confused with all these people quoting other people & sub-quoting the last but one post or part of a sentence etc. Who said what about what & to who?!?
Oh & stop touching my cock with yours you nawty men!

 

[Manrodd]

I find it very erotic.
The idea of a girl pushing the blokes boundaries has always been a turn on for me.
not so far as being out right bi.
nothing makes me flaccid faster than bi porn.
but i love cozy mmfs were the guys are comfortable enough to let the girl lead them just out of their comfort zones.
Like rubbing their cocks together.

I saw a clip once where two guys were laying side by side, legs touching.
Both hand cuffed to the bed.
They were leaning inwards towards the girl and each other.
As the girl went from one to the other she would rest one guys cock on the other guys leg leaving wet patches were contact was made which she would eventually wipe off.

I like to see girls deliberately mix guys juices, making "rope bridges between their cocks.
I like watching a girl use one hand on one guy, then the same hand on the other.
Kissing one after sucking the other.
Giving one guy a handy, then getting the other to lick her hand before she starts on him.
That kind of thing.

But as soon as the guys touch each others cocks with their hands.
Or kiss each other.
I'm limp as a soggy biscuit..
weird eh?


If someone wants to post clips of this nature.
Feel very free to do so

 

[cut]

its hot i love it !

 

[TnA_Addiction]

Enjoy watching it, as does my girlfriend. A lot of things in porn turn me on, doesn't mean I necessarily have any desire to do it though. One of the things I enjoy about porn is seeing different things than the norm.

agreed:thumbsup:

 

[matchmaker123]

cock sword fighting is cool

 

[doctorfew]

We need more of it!

 

[bob_smith404]

sorry, not for me. i am more of FFM man.

 

[PirateKing]