Cocks touching

I suppose if you are a latent homosexual or bisexual, you'd get turned on by this. As I'm neither my answer is: No, not for me.
 
If I'm just watching the scene, I don't mind two guys as long as they're working on opposite ends of the girl and they stagger their cumshots. I can tolerate some touching if they're aiming for her mouth at the same time. Simultaneous pussy and ass fuck just looks too crowded. If I'm in the scene and the other guy's cock touches mine, I'll bet the wood is gone in 3 seconds and it'll take a very long, slow blowjob for her to bring me back up...
 
you should check out this thread 'girl rubbing two cocks together'
http://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?p=2109895

Trying to get some adult groups going on yahoo groups where people can share these kinds of vids. I posted some of my clips to these.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/GirlsRubCocksTogether
girls rubbing two cocks together

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DoubleBarrelBlowjobs
girls giving blowjobs where the guys are laying scissored against eachother with their cocks pressed together into a 'double barrel' as she sucks them off
 
Can't say I mind it one bit. Just a bit of fun, innit?
 
There is only room for one penis in the room at a time. If another were to try to enter, then a battle to the death should ensue.
 
It's awesome how the world fits into your own personal little boxes, isn't it? I suppose if you label people who get turned on by heterosexual group sex acts as latent homosexuals, then you're probably harbouring some latent desires yourself. That's the psychological rule of thumb for anyone who says "that's gay", regardless of how they dress it up.

I believe that there are more latent homosexuals doing straight porn than is publicly recognised. That's perfectly fine by me. I have absolutely no problem with homosexuals at all.

I do feel that there are some who wish to place anti-gay rhetoric in statements made by others when no such anti-gay sentiments were offered.
 
I believe that there are more latent homosexuals doing straight porn than is publicly recognised. That's perfectly fine by me. I have absolutely no problem with homosexuals at all.
Then why make a big deal out of it? Why get all huffy on what constitutes "gayness" or not? Why make it so discrete "gay" or "straight" or even "bi"?

Hell, I get horny thinking about myself pounding my wife. I wish I had a clone so I could enjoy it with two (or more) cocks I already know. Does that make me a bi-sexual? Hell, does that make me tri-sexual (homo, hetro and ... tada, asexual)? ;)

I do feel that there are some who wish to place anti-gay rhetoric in statements made by others when no such anti-gay sentiments were offered.
They may or may not be homophobic, but they are most certainly narrow-minded, and possibly quite argumentative where there is really no need for any discussion.

In other words, your insistence on pointing this out, repeatedly, begs the question, "why?" Because of that, people will wonder if you are doing so because you are, indeed, homophobic.
 
I either fast-forward past that scene or just stop the porno entirely but "whatever floats your boat" or rather, in this case, "whatever tickles your pickle".
 
I don't wish to do that. "if you do this, you're gay, and that's fine, but i'm not, so I wouldn't, so please admit it" and so on and so forth. I promise you all that shit is extremely homophobic and at the very least you're imposing your rules on other people. It is what it is. It's not hard to infer the meaning behind comments. The comments wouldn't infer that if the author of the comments didn't think it.

Then why make a big deal out of it? Why get all huffy on what constitutes "gayness" or not? Why make it so discrete "gay" or "straight" or even "bi"?

Hell, I get horny thinking about myself pounding my wife. I wish I had a clone so I could enjoy it with two (or more) cocks I already know. Does that make me a bi-sexual? Hell, does that make me tri-sexual (homo, hetro and ... tada, asexual)? ;)

They may or may not be homophobic, but they are most certainly narrow-minded, and possibly quite argumentative where there is really no need for any discussion.

In other words, your insistence on pointing this out, repeatedly, begs the question, "why?" Because of that, people will wonder if you are doing so because you are, indeed, homophobic.
His comments weren't homophobic. I read no fear or hatred in his words. They were simply his opinions. You two's (especially the first guys') rather strong objections suggest he maybe more correct then either of you are prepared to admit; not that there's anything wrong with that. :D
 
There is something quite erotic about that for me, I'd try it once ;) but I wouldn't go out of my way to pursue it.
 
Top