bobjustbob

Proud member of FreeOnes Hall Of Fame. Retired to
The information is posted for those who are interested, and for those that may be sick or need help.

I'll help those poor sufferers of the internet disease called Morgellons.

Here is what Kaiser Permanente in Northern California found.
http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0029908


This is what the Mayo Clinic concluded after their 6 year study.
http://archderm.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1105158



As Paul Harvey always said, "And you know the rest of the story."
 

Ace Boobtoucher

Founder and Captain of the Douchepatrol
I apologize profusely Jagger, You should know I was just kidding. But, of course, that was inappropriate of me to say, even in jest. Atlhough I will say that it seems to me the same level of sensitivity regarding stereotypes is not universally applied to all races and ethnicities on FO. But, of course, that is no excuse for my actions. Sorry.

They have nothing better to do & it is and has been for some time a part of their hypocrisy as well as an attempt to maintain control over all faucets of FreeOnes Forums. Better than Sam or worse, I don't know, it's a tough call.

In any regard, if anyone did wish to have discussion on such a matter here they know better as the lambastment from the adolescent high school leaders here would attest. Ignore them as they continually post they would do as to you and others the douche-patrol don't find suitable for their clan.

BTW, I have no interest in this thread other than my statement.

You dickheads realize you're trying to proselytize on a porn forum, right? Anyone who takes your bullshit theories seriously is probably on a forum specifically dedicated to tinfoil hat wearing jagoffs.
 
What kind of a fucking idotic simpleton would tell a sick person that they were delusional just because of some bullshit Mayo clinic report…LOL Seriously, Tattoo Boy, you have hit a new all time low…LOL

I'm not even going to get into all of the procedural and substantive issues with those "Mayo Clinic" case studies because there are just to many, and it's not necessary because in the basic fucking case definition it states that their delusional disorder theory is only possibly applicable where there is no medical or microbiological evidence of the condition. So that theory is not applicable and you can go to the 3:00 mark of the ABC News Night-line Report in post #350 to realize this basic fact.

The delusional infestation theory was addressed and refuted by investigations done within the ABC news report which I posted indicating that fibers appearing in the patient lesions were found and extracted. Morgellons is a generic term for the growth of a new strain of bacterial-like filament organisms. These filaments have been cultivated and studied by independent researchers who have specifically studied this particular bacterial phenomenon for many years.

http://www.carnicominstitute.org

http://www.carnicom.com/morgobs10.htm

The filament has been cultivated and developed from environmental samples and submitted to the EPA who refuse to catalogue it, although they have knowledge of it's existence.

But, as I said, it doesn't really matter what you think. My focus is on providing information to those who may be suffering. And if you plan on telling someone with fibers coming out from under their skin that they aren't sick and in pain, then you are the one who is delusional, with absolute certainty.
http://www.rense.com/general72/weirdbug.htm

*Fortunately, I never personally needed anything like this, however, if anybody is suffering then I hope it helps you.



I'll help those poor sufferers of the internet disease called Morgellons.

Here is what Kaiser Permanente in Northern California found.
http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0029908


This is what the Mayo Clinic concluded after their 6 year study.
http://archderm.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1105158



As Paul Harvey always said, "And you know the rest of the story."
 

bobjustbob

Proud member of FreeOnes Hall Of Fame. Retired to
I'm not even going to get into all of the procedural and substantive issues with those "Mayo Clinic" case studies because there are just to many,

Go ahead big shot, post a few of those procedural issues. Don't just say it, back it up with facts.
 
Go ahead big shot, post a few of those procedural issues. Don't just say it, back it up with facts.

Well, Bob, first and foremost, the case study fails to include individuals in the study who actually have physical evidence, either within their skin, or filaments which they have extracted, of their infection.

This fact alone makes the study borderline fraudulent because anyone who has studied this issue knows that the medical profession refuses to examine the lesions on patients containing filaments, nor will they extract the suspect filaments, or analyze the filaments that patients have extracted themselves. Doctors refuse to do this to maintain, what they consider to be, plausible deniability of the phenomenon.

So to not start at this initial point in beginning the analysis, and compiling the test group, is either hugely negligent, or completely fraudulent.

Also the the case study acknowledges that some people (at least two) who complained of the symptoms, actually had the infection that they complained about. To not address this, and make this the focal point of their study, in conducting their analysis, is a huge procedural and substantive omission and, in my opinion, equally fraudulent.
 
The delusional infestation theory was addressed and refuted by investigations done within the ABC news report which I posted indicating that fibers appearing in the patient lesions were found and extracted. Morgellons is a generic term for the growth of a new strain of bacterial-like filament organisms. These filaments have been cultivated and studied by independent researchers who have specifically studied this particular bacterial phenomenon for many years.

The filament has been cultivated and developed from environmental samples and submitted to the EPA who refuse to catalogue it, although they have knowledge of it's existence.
If Morgellons is a term for an infectious organism, wouldn't that fall under the purview of the CDC rather than the EPA?
 
If Morgellons is a term for an infectious organism, wouldn't that fall under the purview of the CDC rather than the EPA?

It would fall under the CDC's auspice if it were classified, by them, as an infectious organism, however, as I just stated, the medical profession refuses to diagnosis, classify, and treat morgellons as a disease.

It would instead be classified as a completely new strain of bacterial-like filament organism, and fall under the purview of the EPA, because, as a derivative of aerosol chemtrail spraying, it consequently can now be found throughout our natural surface topography, sampled from various environmental terrains, and can then be cultivated, and grown, in an experimental research environment, thus providing conclusive evidence of its existence.
 

JaanaRuutu

Official Checked Star Member
Since all you seemto do is post Youtube videos, i found one, too! And this one doesn't have a title in ALL CAPS WITH LOTS OF PUNCTUATION???????!!! .
 
:wtf: Ummm who put that video together pika pika, your little brother. I have referenced Aviation Scientists, NASA Heliophysicists, Public Health Officials, Political Leaders, Environmental Scientists, .etc. from around the world providing direct testimony substantiating the chemtrail/geoengineering phenomenon. This anonymous little citation-less video you posted is nothing compared to that, and lacks any credibility whatsoever !

Also, for future reference,"debunked" is really not a scientific word of any sophistication.

Since all you seemto do is post Youtube videos, i found one, too! And this one doesn't have a title in ALL CAPS WITH LOTS OF PUNCTUATION???????!!! .
 

bobjustbob

Proud member of FreeOnes Hall Of Fame. Retired to
Well, Bob, first and foremost, the case study fails to include individuals in the study who actually have physical evidence, either within their skin, or filaments which they have extracted, of their infection.

This fact alone makes the study borderline fraudulent because anyone who has studied this issue knows that the medical profession refuses to examine the lesions on patients containing filaments, nor will they extract the suspect filaments, or analyze the filaments that patients have extracted themselves. Doctors refuse to do this to maintain, what they consider to be, plausible deniability of the phenomenon.

So to not start at this initial point in beginning the analysis, and compiling the test group, is either hugely negligent, or completely fraudulent.

Also the the case study acknowledges that some people (at least two) who complained of the symptoms, actually had the infection that they complained about. To not address this, and make this the focal point of their study, in conducting their analysis, is a huge procedural and substantive omission and, in my opinion, equally fraudulent.

I posted links to the full report and you never read them. If you had, you would have seen in both, biopsies samples were done. Samples supplied from patients were also examined and tested.
 

Red XXX

Official Checked Star Member
OMG eric2136 was right I have gotten, and promulgated, this information so as you can all see with your very own eyes ...... it's all true!

 
[B][URL="https://www.freeones.com/red-xxx said:
Red XXX[/URL][/B], post: 8187972, member: 55251"]OMG eric2136 was right I have gotten, and promulgated, this information so as you can all see with your very own eyes ...... it's all true!


No way was this chemtrails, just a bad case of narcolepsy.
 

Philbert

Banned
OMG eric2136 was right I have gotten, and promulgated, this information so as you can all see with your very own eyes ...... it's all true!

Insidious...and to even suggest Eric is right...:facepalm:...go to your room and DON"T play with any toys!
 

Ace Boobtoucher

Founder and Captain of the Douchepatrol
I fucking knew it was Goldfinger and Pussy Galore all along.
 

Jagger69

Three lullabies in an ancient tongue
Better than Sam or worse, I don't know, it's a tough call.

I find it interesting that someone who has been a member here for a little over a month with 69 posts to his/her credit would have such insights on someone who was banned from this site well before he/she became a member. Longtime compulsive lurker who just recently decided to get involved?? I think not. :suspicious:
 

Red XXX

Official Checked Star Member
I find it interesting that someone who has been a member here for a little over a month with 69 posts to his/her credit would have such insights on someone who was banned from this site well before he/she became a member. Longtime compulsive lurker who just recently decided to get involved?? I think not. :suspicious:
:doa82:
 
Top