For the most part, I find tattoos to be a BIG turnoff.
Small, tasteful ones are okay . . . flower/butterfly on the hip or inner thigh . . . around the ankle . . . something that is personal and private, and can be covered up with basic undergarments.
You know what's really ugly? That "tramp stamp" on the lower back, just above the posterior. Not classy at all. Same goes for any tattoo anywhere that is more than a couple of inches long or wide. I see these elaborate sanskrit/ancient lettering tattoos, and I suppose they think that's sophisticated . . . but it's the exact opposite. Very trashy.
A woman with clean, clear, healthy skin is very sexy. As for these women who keep marking themselves up, you have to wonder if they have some sort of psychological problem.
Small, tasteful ones are okay . . . flower/butterfly on the hip or inner thigh . . . around the ankle . . . something that is personal and private, and can be covered up with basic undergarments.
You know what's really ugly? That "tramp stamp" on the lower back, just above the posterior. Not classy at all. Same goes for any tattoo anywhere that is more than a couple of inches long or wide. I see these elaborate sanskrit/ancient lettering tattoos, and I suppose they think that's sophisticated . . . but it's the exact opposite. Very trashy.
A woman with clean, clear, healthy skin is very sexy. As for these women who keep marking themselves up, you have to wonder if they have some sort of psychological problem.
Big P13 said:Ok I see the thread reguarding best tatoo designs on pornstars, so we already know that there are plenty of guys who like tats on gilrs, but I'm wondering if there is anyone else out there, like me, who doesn't like tatoos on women at all. To me it's not a deal breaker, but it is a turn off. In my mind, if you've got a hot body, don't mark it up.
Just curious.