Anybody else think this is getting out of control?

[Thai69]

1) Clearly Obama is more a divider than an uniter. Most of the vote he got were from the black voters and important black personalities.

Maybe the stupidest thing I have ever read on this board. Hey georges, have any idea what the total percentage of the population is in the United States that is black? But you have "been several times in the US" so you're an expert on American politics, did I get that right?

 

[robot_r0ck]

 

[PirateKing]

Never before has one used so many words to say so little.

But you understood what I was asking, right? So Mr. racism expert aka Mr. profound internet quote master, given your adept understanding what's your analysis on those comments?

 

[joilover]

But you understood what I was asking, right? So Mr. racism expert aka Mr. profound internet quote master, given your adept understanding what's your analysis on those comments?

My adept understanding is that you're out of your depth in an adult conversation. You most likely have a very sad, quiet life, and you compensate for this by being that "LOOK OUT! WE'VE GOT A BADASS HERE!" guy on the internet. If you want somebody to back up your flaming against other posters, look elsewhere. Just remember, the more you try to deflect to other people, the more you expose how insecure and weak you are.

 

[PirateKing]

My adept understanding is that you're out of your depth in an adult conversation. You most likely have a very sad, quiet life, and you compensate for this by being that "LOOK OUT! WE'VE GOT A BADASS HERE!" guy on the internet. If you want somebody to back up your flaming against other posters, look elsewhere. Just remember, the more you try to deflect to other people, the more you expose how insecure and weak you are.

That's all dandy, but what do you think of Sam and Georges' comments?

 

[smoknn]

when a 911 recording is altered to control the way people see things...we in a sad sad world people..one dead, ones life at stake....and a sorry no good sumamabitch playing with it like a yo yo......this leaves me without words

 

[joilover]

That's all dandy, but what do you think of Sam and Georges' comments?

I think they bring up good points about Sharpton, Farrakhan, Spike Lee, etc. Those guys are shit stirrers with only one particular group of people that they support. Tell me Farrakhan isn't a racist and an anti-Semite. Tell me Spike Lee didn't have to settle out of court with the family whose house he falsely outed as Zimmerman's. Tell me Al Sharpton ever even pretended to give a shit about anybody who wasn't black. Supporting one race over all others is racist. So Sam and Georges calling those guys racists isn't unreasonable. Sharpton's a shameless opportunist that just lurks waiting for a reason to manufacture outrage, and then get his own ignorant ass in front of a camera. Sam and Georges seeing the forest for the trees isn't racism, it's pragmatism.

 

[PirateKing]

I think they bring up good points about Sharpton, Farrakhan, Spike Lee, etc. Those guys are shit stirrers with only one particular group of people that they support. Tell me Farrakhan isn't a racist and an anti-Semite. Tell me Spike Lee didn't have to settle out of court with the family whose house he falsely outed as Zimmerman's. Tell me Al Sharpton ever even pretended to give a shit about anybody who wasn't black. Supporting one race over all others is racist. So Sam and Georges calling those guys racists isn't unreasonable. Sharpton's a shameless opportunist that just lurks waiting for a reason to manufacture outrage, and then get his own ignorant ass in front of a camera. Sam and Georges seeing the forest for the trees isn't racism, it's pragmatism.

I don't care about the likes of Farrakhan, Lee, ect. They're obvious. I want to know why there is a belief that Zimmerman is justified in killing Trayvon and all the outrage is just a form of black racism. People not swept up by grandstanders and hate advocates can still see the injustice of this situation, but Sam and Georges seem to assert that Zimmerman is simply an innocent victim of media distortion and a "black agenda". I also want to know why the president is lumped in with these guys when he has said very little about this controversy, none of which was incendiary. They're just as bad as the people mentioned above because they think the only problem is racism against whites and fail to see any racism involved on the opposite end. Why is it so easy for them take Zimmerman's word for it or the Sanford police's word for it then simply dismiss anything else indicating the contrary as "media propoganda"? Then they reference pictures of Martin looking like a "thug" or rumors of the reason for being suspended to justify that he probably is a criminal who probably was whaling on Zimmerman. It's sickening IMO.

 

[joilover]

I don't care about the likes of Farrakhan, Lee, ect. They're obvious. I want to know why there is a belief that Zimmerman is justified in killing Trayvon and all the outrage is just a form of black racism. People not swept up by grandstanders and hate advocates can still see the injustice of this situation, but Sam and Georges seem to assert that Zimmerman is simply an innocent victim of media distortion and a "black agenda". I also want to know why the president is lumped in with these guys when he has said very little about this controversy, none of which was incendiary. They're just as bad as the people mentioned above because they think the only problem is racism against whites and fail to see any racism involved on the opposite end. Why is it so easy for them take Zimmerman's word for it or the Sanford police's word for it then simply dismiss anything else indicating the contrary as "media propoganda"? Then they reference pictures of Martin looking like a "thug" to justify that he is a criminal who probably was whaling on Zimmerman. It's sickening IMO.

"If I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon"-Obama. What do you think he's implying? Also, what makes you think any of the information fed to us by the crooked, ratings hungry media is accurate or unbiased? Maybe there's something you don't know, that I can teach you with one statement; EVERYBODY IS RACIST. It doesn't matter what race you are, you're going to have certain prejudices that color your opinion of other people. Maybe Trayvon was a criminal. Maybe he was some kind of angel. Most likely he was somewhere in between, and the media is exploiting whatever image of him drums up the most sympathy, to hook more viewers.

 

[PirateKing]

"If I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon"-Obama. What do you think he's implying? Also, what makes you think any of the information fed to us by the crooked, ratings hungry media is accurate or unbiased? Maybe there's something you don't know, that I can teach you with one statement; EVERYBODY IS RACIST. It doesn't matter what race you are, you're going to have certain prejudices that color your opinion of other people. Maybe Trayvon was a criminal. Maybe he was some kind of angel. Most likely he was somewhere in between, and the media is exploiting whatever image of him drums up the most sympathy, to hook more viewers.

The media can be biased but there are some things you can't distort.

1) Martin was unarmed
2) Zimmerman pursued him on a whim
3) Martin had no bruises on his hands to support that he was punching Zimmerman, as was claimed
4) Security footage shows Zimmerman to have no injury to himself, bandages or blood on his clothes (or it's so minimal that the quality doesn't pick up on it, despite Martin beating on him for a whole minute.)

One can distrust the media, but not the local police or a vigilante?

And what do YOU think Obama is implying with those words? If you want to talk about distorting, people somehow conjured the idea that he made a racial matter out of it. I just saw it as a way of saying that he could be anyone's kid and he was able to emphasize with the tragedy of losing one. I think people choosing to interpret that as something incendiary speak for themselves. There's always a group that seeks to twist things in a way to further their own agenda, no matter how low they have to sink.

 

[joilover]

The media can be biased but there are some things you can't distort.

1) Martin was unarmed
2) Zimmerman pursued him on a whim
3) Martin had no bruises on his hands to support that he was punching Zimmerman, as was claimed
4) Security footage shows Zimmerman to have no injury to himself, bandages or blood on his clothes (or it's so minimal that the quality doesn't pick up on it, despite Martin beating on him for a whole minute.)

One can distrust the media, but not the local police or a vigilante?

And what do YOU think Obama is implying with those words? If you want to talk about distorting, people somehow conjured the idea that he made a racial matter out of it. I just saw it as a way of saying that he could be anyone's kid and he was able to emphasize with the tragedy of losing one. I think people choosing to interpret that as something incendiary speak for themselves.

How do you know any of the things you claim to know?

 

[PirateKing]

How do you know any of the things you claim to know?

Which part? The footage? The fact that Martin didn't have a gun? The 911 audio? The ME's statements? Why can't I go by those? If you're trying to imply that those are fabricated by the media then I'm going to have to call bullshit and think that you really are a troll.

 

[xfire]

The most common way people try to deny their own racism is for them to accuse others of racism.

f you want somebody to back up your flaming against other posters, look elsewhere. Just remember, the more you try to deflect to other people, the more you expose how insecure and weak you are.

Replace "racism" with "trolling" and you've got this asshat joilover pegged. http://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?594064-The-Trolls-Of-Freeones-Talk << Accusing others and deflecting. Motherfucker started a whole thread about it. Serisouly, PK, you've got any doubt? :1orglaugh

 

[joilover]

Which part? The footage? The fact that Martin didn't have a gun? The 911 audio? The ME's statements? Why can't I go by those? If you're trying to imply that those are fabricated by the media then I'm going to have to call bullshit and think that you really are a troll.

Right. Because the media has never distorted or misrepresented anything. They've clearly told 100% of the story, and you have complete access to the total picture. You are gullible, therefore I am a troll? What kind of logic is that? Take the blinders off. You know what makes the world go around? Money. You know how news agencies get their money? Advertisers. You know how advertisers decide how much ad time is worth, therefore how much to pay the news agencies? Ratings. You know how news agencies get ratings? Sensationalism. Spin. Tell the viewer what they want to hear. Create controversy. Manufacture outrage. You don't know a single fact about this case. All you have is best guesses, a poor quality copy of a copy of a surveillance video, 3rd hand accounts from people who were on the phone. Fuzzy 911 recordings. Witnesses who change their stories. All of that amounts to zero credible facts available to the public. Don't they teach critical thinking in schools anymore?

 

[joilover]

Replace "racism" with "trolling" and you've got this asshat joilover pegged. http://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?594064-The-Trolls-Of-Freeones-Talk << Accusing others and deflecting. Motherfucker started a whole thread about it. Serisouly, PK, you've got any doubt? :1orglaugh

Keep on riding my nuts. I think you have a crush on me. Obsess much? Want me to send you some dick pics, sweety pie?

 

[xfire]

Keep on riding my nuts. I think you have a crush on me. Obsess much? Want me to send you some dick pics, sweety pie?

You're not cool gay. You're a fag, like John Edwards. Go suck Sam Fisher's cock, I'm not interested.

 

[joilover]

You're not cool gay. You're a fag, like John Edwards. Go suck Sam Fisher's cock, I'm not interested.

The lady doth protest too much, methinks. Are you a self loathing homophobe? Maybe confused and conflicted by the feeling you get when you see a big, throbbing veiny cock?

 

[xfire]

The lady doth protest too much, methinks. Are you a self loathing homophobe? Maybe confused and conflicted by the feeling you get when you see a big, throbbing veiny cock?

Deflecting and Accusing. Every time you post something like that we all know what you're thinking. :1orglaugh

 

[joilover]

Deflecting and Accusing. Every time you post something like that we all know what you're thinking. :1orglaugh

Other people know what I'm thinking, because they're intellectually capable of reading words and understanding them. You, on the other hand, are reading my posts, holding out hope that I'll ask you to the prom. Spoiler alter: I don't want to go to prom with you. I'm too busy fucking your sister that night while your dad video tapes and jacks off onto her waiting face.

 

[xfire]

Hey, that's high praise for everyone else, and I'm glad you hold them in such high regard because from what I've seen most people that post here can't stand you and think you're a troll.