Sam Fisher
Banned
The 911 Audio Tape
Let's see..........they deliberately used pictures of the dead kid from five years ago to subconsciously influence the masses into believing he was more harmless than he was. Then they doctored his image to make him seem less black. That kind of manipulation is the antithesis of good journalism. That's why.
So you wish the media would make Trayvon look more threatening, justifying Zimmerman's profiling? Gotcha.
Or just not doctor the pictures. Maybe?
Really don't understand why people are making a big deal about the pictures the media are showing.
Let's see..........they deliberately used pictures of the dead kid from five years ago to subconsciously influence the masses into believing he was more harmless than he was. Then they doctored his image to make him seem less black. That kind of manipulation is the antithesis of good journalism. That's why.
Did someone say every picture was doctored? smh
Why change it at all? Why is that ok?
So you wish the media would make Trayvon look more threatening, justifying Zimmerman's profiling? Gotcha.
Did someone say every picture was doctored? smh
Why change it at all? Why is that ok?
There was only one picture I saw that was doctored. But maybe it was doctored because of the shading, or darkness from the hoodie. Isn't this done all the time?
You guys are suggesting that they're trying to make him look "less black", but he looks pretty black in the other photos.
Where are you getting that? Oh, you're reading between the lines because I've clearly and cleverly inserted subliminal messages into my posts. Busted. You got me. I have an axe to grind and I'm going to derail the legal process by posting on a porn forum. You must be Sherlock Fucking Jones or something because my four sentence post was definitely a racially charged, pro-vigilante, hoodie hating diatribe against a fair and balanced media who have nothing to gain from sensationalizing a news story beyond it's rightful status as a tragic event and not because a guy with a white name used really bad judgement when dealing with an idiotic black teenager.
You want to read between the lines? Okay
(Go)
I understand your feelings are very
(fuck)
strong about this incident
(yourself)
and I sincerely hope there is an
(twice)
amicable resolution.
You were implying that they were trying to make him look less harmless.
So, you want the media to make him look more harmful? Correct?
No, you blithering idiot! I want them to portray the incident and its implications accurately and truthfully. Does releasing an un-photoshopped picture make him less tragic or vilify him? No. But bombarding the media with five year old pictures from his prepubescent years and shopping a recent picture to make his appearance more palatable to viewers and make the shooter more unlikeable is not really journalism. At best it's tabloid sensationalism designed to incite the public. If I wanted to say I wish they would portray that idiot as a thug I would have written that. But not all the facts are in and there are idiots like you who will jump to defend or demean someone before the whole story has been told.
There was only one picture I saw that was doctored. But maybe it was doctored because of the shading, or darkness from the hoodie. Isn't this done all the time?
Seeing as Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and The Black Panthers seem to be self appointed leaders for the black community will they come forward and apologise to the families of these 2 guys?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...UILTY-killing-2-British-tourists-Florida.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...rists-told-friend-shot-men-pleaded-lives.html