TheOrangeCat
AFK..being taken to the vet to get neutered.
Great. Another vile bigot being let totally lose on the airwaves. 
Al Sharpton on MSNBC?
- Thread starter Juliuscaesar
- Start date
Fate smacked both Cochrane and Bailey down for their misdeeds with the OJ trial.
Fuhrman does a fantastic job with his insight on murder investigations.
oh yeah, cockrain had nothing to do with it, he never said it, especially in the closing arguments.
interesting, jason simpson wearing the same exact hat, before the murders
http://www.victimsofthestate.org/Docs/CA/JasonSimpson.jpg
Again...Furhman's OWN words ID'ed him as a racist and perjurer under cross examination by F. Lee Bailey.
Case closed.
This isn't about closing arguments or knit caps...Faux employs a person exposed and fired (or quit) as a racist perjurer. Of all the so called cop Fauxperts they could dig up..they dig up a racist perp. But MSNBC should be ashamed for who they pay....
meesterperfect
Hiliary 2020
you base a lot on one word, just like that jury did.
i guess youre more the chris mathews type anyway.
i guess youre more the chris mathews type anyway.
Again, you would do yourself a huge favor if you follow reputable news sources like most normal people.
It wasn't one word that got Furhman sacked and had him copping 5ths like a drunk on his first night off the wagon.
Of course Bailey tied that around his neck but the subsequent recordings of Furhman himself saying much much more is was sunk his dumbass....
The ends justify means imbecile sat there with his face as straight as an arrow claiming he didn't say .....as if Bailey was making shit up. Then came the tapes of the fool dropping N bombs all over the place ...next thing you know he's pleading the 5th over and over...
All I remember is Martia(sp?) Clark glaring at the fool like she was going to pistol whip his doofus ass as soon as got off the witness stand...
meh..
one more racist over the airways aint gonna hurt nothin
i am atleast glad to see a little diversity tho
one more racist over the airways aint gonna hurt nothin
i am atleast glad to see a little diversity tho
meesterperfect
Hiliary 2020
Again, you would do yourself a huge favor if you follow reputable news sources like most normal people.
It wasn't one word that got Furhman sacked and had him copping 5ths like a drunk on his first night off the wagon.
Of course Bailey tied that around his neck but the subsequent recordings of Furhman himself saying much much more is was sunk his dumbass....
The ends justify means imbecile sat there with his face as straight as an arrow claiming he didn't say .....as if Bailey was making shit up. Then came the tapes of the fool dropping N bombs all over the place ...next thing you know he's pleading the 5th over and over...
All I remember is Martia(sp?) Clark glaring at the fool like she was going to pistol whip his doofus ass as soon as got off the witness stand...
yes years before he said the word ******.
that means he can not be a good crime analyst.
look i did too: ******.
that means that from this point on i am a racist and nothing i do or say can be trusted.
not like sharptongue, a guy who has made a living off of lies, accusations of racism, demands, and basically trying to cause black/white race problems for the past 25 years........he desreves a job at some liberal news station.
TheOrangeCat
AFK..being taken to the vet to get neutered.
Uhm, no ......
It's called - CONTEXT
'I am outraged at the use of the word '******''
vs
'You are a ******'
very, very different
meesterperfect
Hiliary 2020
Oh, youre right.
Its amazing how much power that word has, in the usa.
Thanks for educating me because although they tried to teach me how to think in school I didnt conform to it, you know about what white people can and can't say........but with your help here I now see how those six letters put in a certain order mean so much.
Don't waste your time. I tried this game a million times a million different ways with m/p. Meester doesn't see the "value" (understand?) of context in a statement.
He apparently sees no difference between a statement like, "I going to kill you" from a person waving a gun at another from the statement, "I'm going to kill you' coming from a mother to a kid who's tracked mud on her carpet.
They're just words....
TheOrangeCat
AFK..being taken to the vet to get neutered.
You are quite welcome :hatsoff:
Next, if you like, I can show you how to use sarcasm properly
You cracker
meesterperfect
Hiliary 2020
Don't waste your time. I tried this game a million times a million different ways with m/p. Meester doesn't see the "value" (understand?) of context in a statement.
He apparently sees no difference between a statement like, "I going to kill you" from a person waving a gun at another from the statement, "I'm going to kill you' coming from a mother to a kid who's tracked mud on her carpet.
They're just words....
sure I do, and i've been listening to the value of shartoons words for years, all of them screaming " I hate white people".
So I do value statements.
and basically to me the word ****** is just another insulting word, equal to any other insulting word.
I place no more or no less value on it than any other........unlike most who have been literally trained to respond to it in a certain way depending on who has said it.
Americans are obsessed with the word.
And insulting words exist for a reason, and sometimes they are apt.
Again, for the millionth time. It wasn't just Furhman abstractly uttering a word. It was the context of his statements in what he would do to ******s because they were ******s, etc.
Like I said before, Bailey just hung that word around his neck just for show...as Furhman's statements were racist and bigoted on their own even if he never uttered that particular word in making the statements.
Getting through yet or are you going to continue to see what you want to see?
I'm sure you'll be his number one (and ONLY) fan. :thumbsup:
I rarely watch MSNBC and the only show I tended to watch with any consistency was Olbermann.
I typically find myself turn to MSNBC or CNN just to see if the world ended while I was sleeping then maybe to Faux to see what they're spinning then I'm off to doing something else.
These network/shows are only interesting when they're something happening...when you can see what kind of red meat is being tossed around.
Beyond that...
Faux is the only one of the 3 that finds a way to keep their audience entertained even if for the sake of ill-informing, demagoging or misleading...
You can't make any statement without your biased showing. :throwup:
No worries. You are one of the bright ones on here (I didn't say wise).
If you're views are skewed, just don't expect to be taken seriously.
Meh...opinions vary. I personally would rather engage seriously a person who I perceive to be skewed, bias or whatever (you think) than wasting time with a person incapable of remaining intellectually honest in a discussion that doesn't float their way or suit their perspective.:2 cents:
If you believe bias is refuting other bias numbskullery....then, yea...I'm bias...:yesyes::wave:
Ironically in your desperate effort to come off unbias...you prove over and over to be one of the most bias people here.
Every time you insult me, you send up a white flag of surrender. It is a sign of weakness.
I keep trying to get your to be intellectually honest. That is why I point out your consistent bias. If you think it is ok to be blinded by dogma, that is your right. Just don't ask me to stop pointing it out.
Good example above-I took a shot at the left and right biased "news" channels. You had to heap more insults on one side. There was no need for it.
Insult all you want. I try to be positive.
Best off watching CNN. :2 cents:
Not sure what you take as insults but your skin must be as thin as membrane...
I may make my points in frank terms but I haven't insulted you...but..believe what you will...
You're getting more and more like 'dents 1 everyday in that you freely allow facts to roll off of you like water off a duck's back. Now...comparing you to the 'dent might be considered bashing or insulting ..but knowing you...you'd perceive it as a compliment....enjoy either way...
You seem stuck in the rut of the belief challenging a supposition or refuting a claim that happens to be from the other side is inherently and disparagingly bias. Well, of course virtually any challenge to overt bias is going to come off as bias to someone who merely disagrees....but are you positive you're not just a negative?
