You would have been so at home in the Soviet Union.
:rofl2:
.......and still Meg has yet to offer condolences for the 31 dead. Quite telling.
You would have been so at home in the Soviet Union.
Er I am not a freak as you put it. My argument was that in war people die that's the point else it wouldn't be war & my full post made reference to previous wars & the huge numbers of deaths incurred which would have made for alarming news reports. The issue is if we are going to report every time someone looses their life in conflict it becomes ridiculous. The issue is this, since the Vietnam debacle America wants to be able to win a war without any casualties in its ranks. A stupid notion but a few years ago there was an attempt to hide the reality of military deaths in conflict from the press, now its gone the other way!!31 of anybody dying in an instant on the face of this earth is a news story ... freak.
.......and still Meg has yet to offer condolences for the 31 dead. Quite telling.
:rofl2:
.......and still Meg has yet to offer condolences for the 31 dead. Quite telling.
Indeed, it's telling in that it shows the depths you'll sink to in order to prove that you're a bigger patriot than someone else, in this case it's using the deaths of 31 people. Classy :hatsoff:
I wonder who the families of all the soldiers who have died in that place believe are being more respectful towards the dead- those who want to end the war or those who stick their little heads up on internet forums and type RIP while insisting the conflict continue.
:rofl2:
.......and still Meg has yet to offer condolences for the 31 dead. Quite telling.
Meanwhile...you're still bumping and debating this...(posting :rofl 2: and shit like there's a joke somewhere in this other than in your profile...not sure what at all could prompt that in a thread like this...'telling'. But knock yourself out.)
So? Its not mandatory to offer condolences. . .we'd be doing it all the bloody time the way this 'war' is going!!It's customary for military vets to give condolences for their fellow fallen.
Interesting how you haven't done so considering you're supposed to be in your words, "a former member of Frank Carlucci's armed forces".:o
For example the website below has former and currently serving armed forces members offering condolences.
http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?202114-37-US-SOF-ANA-KIA-in-helo-crash-in-wardak-afgh-RIP-COMMENTS-ONLY!
It's customary for military vets to give condolences for their fellow fallen.
Interesting how you haven't done so considering you're supposed to be in your words, "a former member of Frank Carlucci's armed forces".:o
For example the website below has former and currently serving armed forces members offering condolences.
http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?202114-37-US-SOF-ANA-KIA-in-helo-crash-in-wardak-afgh-RIP-COMMENTS-ONLY!
So? Its not mandatory to offer condolences. . .we'd be doing it all the bloody time the way this 'war' is going!!
Naaaah, it isn't, but I think if you're going to jaw about it that much, it is just a decent thing to do.
Yes it does. & your comments speak volumes about you, what an amazing person you are for saying RIP & stuff on a internet messageboard. You are just simply like so wonderful. . .Well it's a bit late for Meg to do so. His inaction spoke volumes and revealed who/what he isn't.
Yes it does. & your comments speak volumes about you, what an amazing person you are for saying RIP & stuff on a internet messageboard. You are just simply like so wonderful. . .
Yes it does. & your comments speak volumes about you, what an amazing person you are for saying RIP & stuff on a internet messageboard. You are just simply like so wonderful. . .
Wow! What a guy! So selfless! You are truly a remarkable human!This isn't about me.
So, 31 Seals from the same unit that gunned down an unarmed Osama, and also shot his unarmed wife, get shot down themselves. At least they were armed when that rocket-propelled grenade came in. 'Brave' soldiers? give me a break.
I also lose all sympathy for that campaign in general when I read reports such as this:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jul/11/cia-fake-vaccinations-osama-bin-ladens-dna
How many kids died because their parents believed they were inoculated against Hepatitis, when it was all a con by the CIA? Does the CIA or the US care?