In the last few months, one of the Bangbus videos has been removed, entitled "Spring Break Hottie" and starring Yanni B (Ep. 4222, March 12, 2008).
Coincidentally, I have discovered that an older one of their videos has also been removed, entitled "Burn That Baby Fat," starring Kelly (Ep. 837, February 9, 2005).
Out of curiosity, I checked their first page; assuming they were posting new episodes every week at that time, at least when they were entusiastically starting out of the gate, there are a lot of gaps, presumably adding up to more videos that have been removed.
Now it has been clearly established that the site is phony, as much as some of us would love to believe it is all on the level. This means the women are hired performers, and have all signed releases.
So what possible reason could there be for the removal of these videos?
There was an exposé on the site in a Florida newspaper article, detailing that the site was a fake (I believe a female reporter posed as a spy) and how one desperate lass had agreed to perform. After she had second thoughts, and asked for the removal of her video, she was reportedly informed that it would cost her $50,000 because (and this is from memory) that is how much money the video was raking in or had raked in (in other words, the video was too much of a cash cow for the site owners to remove simply as a favor).
If this is true, then we may conclude the site owners are not simply going to remove videos just because the performer no longer wishes to have it circulate.
So, again, why would the aforementioned videos have been removed?
Another thing that is curious is that few of the women who have appeared on the Bangbus site have gone on to do other porno. If we figure in the curiosity-seekers who have "been there, done that" and have happily moved on, logic would suggest that there would be a sizeable number interested in trying at least a few other porn experiences before cashing it in.
So if we also figure in the desperate ones who need to make money in a hurry, as the woman featured in the newspaper article, why do you suppose most of the women on Bangbus are one trick ponies?
I'm not making an argument that the site is for real; it's clearly not. But it doesn't make sense for (if we may stereotype) ruthless porn producers to remove so many videos out of the goodness of their hearts. (Because legally, they own these videos -- assuming the hired help have signed releases.)
Yet knowing that it's phony, there are a good number of scenes in these videos where the situations and the performances would be so difficult to fake. Let's bear in mind the usual porn where the actresses are required to act, and many simply cannot sustain the reality; most porn actresses quickly give themselves away.
In addition, a good number of the Bangbus women are average-looking, and classically very unpornographic -- if that makes sense.
Does anyone have theories? Is it possible, for example, that at least some of the women are definitely for real, and then are somehow misled?
To close, there was a comment on a YouTube page (where anyone can write anything, and I am not saying this would serve as a substitute for an actual fact) from someone who claimed to have gotten some lowdown about "Sanchez," the original Bangbus trickster: the story went that Sanchez got arrested for offering money to a woman to have sex in the van, in the usual Bangbus manner, and got thrown in the slammer. This is why he quit the Bangbus business.
.
Coincidentally, I have discovered that an older one of their videos has also been removed, entitled "Burn That Baby Fat," starring Kelly (Ep. 837, February 9, 2005).
Out of curiosity, I checked their first page; assuming they were posting new episodes every week at that time, at least when they were entusiastically starting out of the gate, there are a lot of gaps, presumably adding up to more videos that have been removed.
Now it has been clearly established that the site is phony, as much as some of us would love to believe it is all on the level. This means the women are hired performers, and have all signed releases.
So what possible reason could there be for the removal of these videos?
There was an exposé on the site in a Florida newspaper article, detailing that the site was a fake (I believe a female reporter posed as a spy) and how one desperate lass had agreed to perform. After she had second thoughts, and asked for the removal of her video, she was reportedly informed that it would cost her $50,000 because (and this is from memory) that is how much money the video was raking in or had raked in (in other words, the video was too much of a cash cow for the site owners to remove simply as a favor).
If this is true, then we may conclude the site owners are not simply going to remove videos just because the performer no longer wishes to have it circulate.
So, again, why would the aforementioned videos have been removed?
Another thing that is curious is that few of the women who have appeared on the Bangbus site have gone on to do other porno. If we figure in the curiosity-seekers who have "been there, done that" and have happily moved on, logic would suggest that there would be a sizeable number interested in trying at least a few other porn experiences before cashing it in.
So if we also figure in the desperate ones who need to make money in a hurry, as the woman featured in the newspaper article, why do you suppose most of the women on Bangbus are one trick ponies?
I'm not making an argument that the site is for real; it's clearly not. But it doesn't make sense for (if we may stereotype) ruthless porn producers to remove so many videos out of the goodness of their hearts. (Because legally, they own these videos -- assuming the hired help have signed releases.)
Yet knowing that it's phony, there are a good number of scenes in these videos where the situations and the performances would be so difficult to fake. Let's bear in mind the usual porn where the actresses are required to act, and many simply cannot sustain the reality; most porn actresses quickly give themselves away.
In addition, a good number of the Bangbus women are average-looking, and classically very unpornographic -- if that makes sense.
Does anyone have theories? Is it possible, for example, that at least some of the women are definitely for real, and then are somehow misled?
To close, there was a comment on a YouTube page (where anyone can write anything, and I am not saying this would serve as a substitute for an actual fact) from someone who claimed to have gotten some lowdown about "Sanchez," the original Bangbus trickster: the story went that Sanchez got arrested for offering money to a woman to have sex in the van, in the usual Bangbus manner, and got thrown in the slammer. This is why he quit the Bangbus business.
.
