http://www.imagebam.com/image/162182546210247 Now, that's a nice look, thadogg. Thanks for posting these.
Xo Gisele/ Got Gisele / Love Gisele / Love Giselle
- Thread starter Simon Jeremy
- Start date
http://www.imagebam.com/image/7feb18546210275 Servin' it up. :love-smi: 
I love the suggestion and don't need the toy work so much.
I love the suggestion and don't need the toy work so much.
http://www.imagebam.com/image/7feb18546210275 Servin' it up. :love-smi:
I love the suggestion and don't need the toy work so much.
I agree regarding toy/dildo addition. Don't care much for it.
I still think that she could lose a pound or two and, more importantly, improve (a lot) the quality of the photography. What we see right now is a far cry from what she used to place in her website. :2 cents:
But, of course, I'm not saying anything new. :horse:
spikent653
Banned
Okay, 17 posts deleted. If anyone wants to be a troll, go the the talk section and post all you want.
If I have to come in here again for this crap, someone is getting a vacation.
If I have to come in here again for this crap, someone is getting a vacation.
http://www.imagebam.com/image/7d7274547781301
Beautiful as always, but thick going on too much so.
Beautiful as always, but thick going on too much so.
Yes, slender looks better on her, IMO. Or maybe it's because we got used to see her like that for so long that her new look is harder to digest.
Not to mention her lack of willingness to mix it up a little more and change the scenery a bit: bathroom, bed, couch or pool...we've seen it all.
Not to mention her lack of willingness to mix it up a little more and change the scenery a bit: bathroom, bed, couch or pool...we've seen it all.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C_63KxDXoAE4cZW.jpg
Her latest twitter entry. I'd like this image were it not so grainy.
Her latest twitter entry. I'd like this image were it not so grainy.
I concur. Maybe thadogg or other current members could clarify the issue about photography quality. It was insinuated that her pics in Twitter were actually lower quality, promo like material of the actual full size photos in her site. I tend to disagree about this, because I remember that she always used to post either selfies or actual size photos as teasers in her social media.
Some of what that guy and I got into it over the other night (and the only thing he said that made sense to me) was that these images are screencaps from videos Gisele makes and not purposely taken still photos, hence the rough quality. WHY she's now doing things that way went unresolved.
My take is somewhat broader, that she's reduced both the quantity & quality of her production and tried to compensate for it by more graphic themes. For some of us that still works great, for others less so.
My take is somewhat broader, that she's reduced both the quantity & quality of her production and tried to compensate for it by more graphic themes. For some of us that still works great, for others less so.
HansMoleman
Chief Porn Collector
That means her camcorder is crap too, and she needs a better one. You can get great stills from a good video recorder.
Bottom line- less attention and care for detail whether it comes from crappy equipment or simple apathy.
She's still got the looks but doesn't present it with the same quality. That's hard to swallow after so many years of her being my personal favorite. Oh, well.
She's not going to college. I think she was going to a beauty school of sorts to do laser treatments or something like that. I don't know the title but I think it started with an E