I didn't necessarily read his post that way, but I can see how you might have considering how often the bogus (imo) "biological imperative" argument is used in an attempt to justify double standards.
I have always HATED that.
One of my biggest pet peeves is when people use the argument of "men/women are
born that way" when they try to explain why they do certain things.
I had a talk with one of my female friends about this once and she got pretty defensive. She tried to make the argument that women like shopping and dressing sexy because that's how they are
born. So, I said to her, "Really? When you're
born, do you know what a sale at Macy's is?" She obviously got pretty pissy with me, but I believe I made my point.
Society will "teach" you these things as you grow up. It has absolutely nothing to do with your genetics, but it does have everything to do with your personality and how it develops as you're being raised. It just pisses me off when people use their genetics to justify their actions and how they live their life. Men and women alike.
So you're saying it is better if the men just cheat, right? Since men are the ones (by far) who cheat. They don't seem to mind an "open relationship" for themselves, but not their women. Double standard, much?
First of all, it depends on what your defintion of cheating is. Some people consider it cheating only if you have sex with someone else, some people consider it cheating if you kiss someone else and some people consider it cheating if you're emotionally involved with someone else.
Personally, I know more women than men who have cheated. The only reason people say that men cheat more is because that's what society will have you believe.
"Men are pigs". "Men just want one thing". "Men want to have sex with as many women as possible". That's society talking...not reality.