Worst films you have seen
- Thread starter SiliconeTits
- Start date
bibo said:Highlander 2
Reloaded
The Sequel of Silence of the lambs (Hannibal? can´t remember the title)
hm, seems like I don´t like Sequels then
Reloaded, blah, join the bandwagon of people who don't like the matrix sequels, because of you like them, you are not cool.
The thing that really gets to me is that its the same explanation over and over. It simply did not top the original. Well what more did you expect, there is no chance in hell you can ever top a film with the magnititude the first matrix movie did. The thing is this was planned as a trilogy from the very beginning. The second one moved the story along, and if you thought the third would end on a high note, we all know (at least anyone with a brain) it was gonna be about the war with the machines. All these sci-fi movies (star wars, Matrix, terminator , hell even Lord of the Rings) all tell the same story. The struggle for peace in the world.
Scorpion said:
I agree with Scorpion. MI 2 was a great action film. Yes, i was a bit cheesy in parts but it was far better than the first mission impossible.
My worst films would be:
1. Independance Day - Utter, utter cheese. Made me cringe. Totally OTT.
2. Until the end of the world - Wim Wenders is supposed to be some hip, cult film director, but this was totally confusing and a waste of 2 and a half hours of my life.:wtf:
3. John Carpenters Vampires - UTTER CRAP
4. Time Machine -
:helpme: :lame:
ROTLD said:
agree very much with your choices...but to 28days later...i think it was more a movie about survival rather then a 'horror' which is why i like it so much because of how it focuses on this and how humans react to it (army guys for one!!) i thought it was a great achivement
bishbash1 said:
total agreence...it was just one long l'orreal advert
mission impossible was clever and had fabulous direction (the scene in the restaurant is prolly my all time fave scene on cinema)
it was made exactly like how mission impossible was ment to be, only modonised!
I don´t care about being cool or not, dude. I think I`ve passed that phase some time ago.
I´ve seen Reloaded an I was dissapointed, that´s just my opinion, can´t help it.
Effects and everything was great, but the story....
They just didn´t manage to keep the atmosphere and tension of Matrix up and alive. To me, it appeared as if somebody has had a great idea for a story, started it and the just didn´t quite know what to make of his idea in the middle of the story. That´s the problem with sequels. They always have to top the first part, or they´re going down.
Violator79
Take a Hit, Spunker!
Any Jean Claude Van Damme movie. Well Bloodsport's a good movie cause it's a true story. Other than that, they all suck. Speed 2 was awful, I mean awful. Showgirls sucked, except for Gina Gershon naked in it.
Good call on Speed 2. I remember when the first movie became a success, then there was talk of a sequel - but reports were that Keanu didn't want to star in it. People wondered, "Why would he turn down such a surefire hit?!"
Then they made the movie with a different star, the movie sucked, and Mr. Reeves looked pretty smart.
Then they made the movie with a different star, the movie sucked, and Mr. Reeves looked pretty smart.
reeves didnt wanna do it...because he'd lost alot of musle and become a bit podgy apparently....and was not willing to beef up again
even tho speed to is a dog awful film...you cant really say that and not say that its prequal didnt have the best of all scripts...it was just a good idea
even tho speed to is a dog awful film...you cant really say that and not say that its prequal didnt have the best of all scripts...it was just a good idea
you seem to have good taste in films georges my friend im just reognasing my collection at the mo....i need more shelves!!!
im just reognasing my collection at the mo....i need more shelves!!!its a mixed collection of dvd's and vids.....cant see the point in wasting to much money on dvd's that dont have anything special or interesting on them when you can get vids for next to nothing
SiliconeTits said:
This is also how my wife feels. So we do in fact still purchase VHS, mainly because they are so cheap. Best Buy, et al. sell them at simetimes a third of the DVD cost.
However, I am an A/V junkie and while my wife will watch her chick flicks on VHS, I can stand watching VHS for any movie I might care about. Its such horrible contrast and graininess. Check this site out for comparison:
http://dvd.ign.com/news/15687.html?fromint=1
And don't get me started on pan-n-scan (or pan-n-fuck-up-the-movie as I call it) versus widescreen. My sister used to work at a blockbuster, and she couldn't believe the number of people that complained saying that their movie was "broken" -- it had "black bars cutting off the top and bottom of the screen". They just couldn't understand that it is the pan-n-scan format that crops the film, not the widescreen.
i know what you mean with picture aspects....i buy my absolute fave films on dvd....but i still stick to buying vids too.....call me weird cause i know i am but sometimes i think the picture on a dvd disc is almost to clear...weird huh!?...i dont know why but if its a cgi consisted movie then i'd prefer to watch it on video...because basically the grainess can hide somethings that a perfect picture cant!...lol..
i geuss its sort of like vinyl and cd...tho thats the stupidest thing i ever heard....hehehe
Similar threads
