Whatever happened to the five links per post rule? The fuck is going on here?
Sorry, I have read the rules, but I forgot that.
Women in military
- Thread starter assari
- Start date
Sorry, I have read the rules, but I forgot that.
True, but information technology is Greek to me.
I have tried to link the images in such a way that they appear in the message, but I failed.
FreeOnes_Anders
Closed Account
Och dessa har man i familjen... Perkele...
L3ggy
Special Operations FOX-HOUND
bahodeme
Closed Account
That part is in response to your statement
As in the rest of my post, who is capable of combat should be on an individual basis. I thought that is was mandatory for Finnish men to serve in the military. Therefore you should have seen for yourself some men you would not want to go in combat with. I don't know if it is mandatory for women or if they are allowed in combat positions. Perhap you can expound on this.
GodsEmbryo
Closed Account
Oh I see, I think what you are trying to say is that you consider women to be this part of humanity that represents beauty, respect, care, love and so on as opposed to the brutality, anger, etc that man can show. And since war is considered a playground for this brutality (or playground of men) you find it a shame that women are actually part of the army. You don't want to see women to be part of this brutality.
Is this what you mean? Correct me if I'm wrong.
I remember seeing these articles. As I said women have performed well in Iraq and Afghanistan.
http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/women-to-attend-marine-infantry-school/
http://www.armytimes.com/news/2012/05/ap-army-leaders-mull-sending-women-ranger-school-051612/
I have no problem with women serving in the US military 'cause I'm not serving. I'm not donning the uniform. Don't care if North Korea and Iran are secretly teaming up to go to war with the good ol' US of A. I ain't fighting. I ain't fighting nobody. I got vision problems in my right eye and I got a bum leg. I'm too smart to be drafted. You can't draft me! If feminists want to serve in the military and take my place during times of war then I'm more than happy to let them do it. Be my guest. Be MY guest!!
Hard to belive that a small country like North Korea would be a threat to the United States.
I thought that the women in military service would be a fashion phenomenon.
Feminism is therefore the real reason.:hatsoff:
bahodeme
Closed Account
If you look at U.S. history, small countries seem to give us an issue. Look at the Vietnam, Korea Wars, even Japan in WW2. North Korea in and of itself is not really a problem if the U. S. decides to use the "by any means necessary" approach. We still have the dubious honor of being the only country to use atomic weapons in warfare.
It would be interesting to hear their war experiences.
The war against terrorists must be unnerving, because anyone can be a suicide bomber.
It is often said that the United States and the Soviet Union went to war against each other in a small country terrain.
Use of the atomic bomb may have saved lives.
The Japanese were just as bad as the nazis, so without a proper attack they had not come to their senses.
bahodeme
Closed Account
All three points are correct. During the cold war era if you said you were for or against communism is where you would be able to arms shop. It was a way for each country to be able to test and perfect their armament without nuclear destruction.
Not only because of the count of soldiers and civilians that would have been lost, but also there has been no global war since; that would be a pro to your argument.
In your third point I think it was the leaders not necessarily the people that came to their senses. I think after the fire bombings there was some "attitude adjustment" with the civilians.
