Why doesn't the left appeal to excellence?

[sean miguel]

this is a thing with me. the whole "suck and ****" thing.

but seriously, why don't they?

"Excellence" is a bigoted construct according to them. Why they award participation trophies or don't keep score. They are all about envy, hatred, suck and ****. Except for their elites behind their walls of course. We see it in it's logical conclusion with the communist revolutions of the 20th century and the mass ****** and misery that ensued. Venezuela is the shining example today. They have literally eaten their *** *******.

Gawd, I **** the fucking left.

</rant>

 

[Johan]

Most artists, most scientists and 5 of the 4 wealthiest americans are democrats (Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Warren Buffet and Mark Zuckerberg)

I don't know what makes you think the Left doesn't appeal ot excellence but one thing's for sure : Excellence appeals to the Left

 

[sean miguel]

Most artists, most scientists and 5 of the 4 wealthiest americans are democrats (Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Warren Buffet and Mark Zuckerberg)

I don't know what makes you think the Left doesn't appeal ot excellence but one thing's for sure : Excellence appeals to the Left

Except for their elites behind their walls of course.

The late Hugo Chavez's ******** is the richest woman in Venezuela (worth $3.6 billion). Meanwhile, the average Venezuelan has lost 20+ lbs in body weight due to food shortages.

What is going on in France today and the concessions that Macron is making in order to avoid the guillotine?

#SuckAndShit

And you're confusing an "appeal to" vs. in practice. Hence the hypocrisy.


The whole ****** **** thing.

 

[Johan]

So, the Left doesn't appela to excellence except for the elites, right ?
But, aren't elites the epidemy of excellence, it's litteraly, the best of the best
The Left doesn' appeal to excellence, except of the elites, can't you see the balantant oxymoron here ?

 

[Jack Davenport]

Most artists, most scientists and 5 of the 4 wealthiest americans are democrats (Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Warren Buffet and Mark Zuckerberg)

I don't know what makes you think the Left doesn't appeal ot excellence but one thing's for sure : Excellence appeals to the Left

Excellence is not measured by wealth.

 

[sean miguel]

So, the Left doesn't appela to excellence except for the elites, right ?
But, aren't elites the epidemy of excellence, it's litteraly, the best of the best
The Left doesn' appeal to excellence, except of the elites, can't you see the balantant oxymoron here ?

No, the leftist elites appeal to envy and grievance to the masses while they guffaw in Davos. What they advocate for vs how they are actually living. We've been over this. They impose crippling gas taxes on those who make their living driving all the while flying around in their private jets.


Sorry, Johan, but you are a prime example of non-excellence.

 

[Johan]

Excellence is not measured by wealth.

Fair enough

Then would you qualify founding you own company and making it one of the most profitable in the world as excellence ? Because that's exactly what Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg did.

 

[Jack Davenport]

Fair enough

Then would you qualify founding you own company and making it one of the most profitable in the world as excellence ? Because that's exactly what Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg did.

They are innovators that were rewarded with wealth. Most all of their products are flawed. Which would be shy of excellence.

 

[Johan]

Speaking about the Left, you would agree that Finland is a Leftist country, right ?
Speaking about excellence, you would agree that a education is a big part of it, right ?

Because Finland is often considered to have the world's #1 educationnal system

And guess what, they have free college, just like socialist scum Bernie Sanders would like to have in the US

 

[sean miguel]

They are innovators that were rewarded with wealth. Most all of their products are flawed. Which would be shy of excellence.

or in Jeff Bezos' case, how they treat their own employees.

These are "progressive" and "enlightened" robber baron tycoons.

 

[Jack Davenport]

Speaking about the Left, you would agree that Finland is a Leftist country, right ?
Speaking about excellence, you would agree that a education is a big part of it, right ?

Because Finland is often considered to have the world's #1 educationnal system

And guess what, they have free college, just like socialist scum Bernie Sanders would like to have in the US

A college education makes someone more marketable than someone that does not have a college education. Once everyone gets a college education, it will reduce its value.
Scandinavian countries are moving away from socialism.

 

[sean miguel]

Speaking about the Left, you would agree that Finland is a Leftist country, right ?
Speaking about excellence, you would agree that a education is a big part of it, right ?

Because Finland is often considered to have the world's #1 educationnal system

And guess what, they have free college, just like socialist scum Bernie Sanders would like to have in the US

how would that be affordable in the U.S?

What is Finland's defense budget while it enjoys the umbrella of the U.S.'?

We really should cut you off and let you fend for yourselves against Putin. It would be no sweat off my sack and I could gloat about it as Russian tanks parade down Champs-Élysées.

 

[Johan]

how would that be affordable in the U.S?

Excellence has a cost.

What is Finland's defense budget while it enjoys the umbrella of the U.S.'?

How is finland benefitting from that umbrella ? And please, don't tell me it protects them from a russian invasion

We really should cut you off and let you fend for yourselves against Putin. It would be no sweat off my sack and I could gloat about it.

Go for it. the US military isn't protecting us from Putin because Putin's more subtle than that. He's a former KGB, he uses influence and against that, we certainly don't need "protection" from a country in which the President stated he trusts putin more than his country's intelligence.

A college education makes someone more marketable than someone that does not have a college education. Once everyone gets a college education, it will reduce its value.

Not everyone in Finland receives college education. But those who have the necessary skills get it. Those who don't have these skills find other ways to make good use of their own skills.

 

[sean miguel]

Excellence has a cost.

stupidity certainly does.

How is finland benefitting from that umbrella ? And please, don't tell me it protects them from a russian invasion

Go for it. the US military isn't protecting us from Putin because Putin's more subtle than that. He's a former KGB, he uses influence and against that, we certainly don't need "protection" from a country in which the President stated he trusts putin more than his country's intelligence.

If the U.S. were to pull out of NATO and give the green light to Putin to do what he wanted (as a former KBG officer) what do you think would happen? At the very least in Ukraine?

You stupid fucks in western europe and the UK owe your very freedom (to be stupid fucks) to the U.S.

 

[Johan]

You think the US are "protecting the world" out of good will
In case you don't know, the point of the Iraq war wasn't to free the country from Saddam, it was to seize control of the oil. The Us don't give a **** of foreign people, they just want to secure their assets or to seize new ones.
Not even mentionning that the "umbrella" is necessary to keep the military-industrial complex functionning.

 

[sean miguel]

You think the US are "protecting the world" out of good will
In case you don't know, the point of the Iraq war wasn't to free the country from Saddam, it was to seize control of the oil. The Us don't give a **** of foreign people, they just want to secure their assets or to seize new ones.
Not even mentionning that the "umbrella" is necessary to keep the military-industrial complex functionning.

what did I say that had anything to do with "good will"? That's a separate argument. Was it factual that the U.S. has and continues to protect western europe militarily?

excellence, Johan.

I wouldn't nor would I want any of my ****** to die for you. I'm pro Russia rolling over all of you.

 

[Johan]

what did I say that had anything to do with "good will"? That's a separate argument. Was it factual that the U.S. has and continues to protect western europe militarily?

Had : YES
Continues : NO

And what's factual is that without US, french, you would still be subjects to her Majesty the Queen of England

excellence, Jack. Get with it.

 

[sean miguel]

Had : YES
Continues : NO

And what's factual is that without US, french, you would still be subjects to her Majesty the Queen of England

No they wouldn't. As you pointed out in another thread (moron) - it's the natural course for empires to rise and fall. Would India still be under British rule without France?

lol STFU.

 

[Johan]

No they wouldn't. As you pointed out in another thread (moron) - it's the natural course for empires to rise and fall. Would India still be under British rule without France?

lol STFU.

Then you would agree that, even without americans we would have get rid f nazis, right ?
Don't even bother to answer, it's indeniable : even without americans, the nazis would have been defeated by russia.
We don't need your military "protection".

 

[sean miguel]

Then you would agree that, even without americans we would have get rid f nazis, right ?
Don't even bother to answer, it's indeniable : even without americans, the nazis would have been defeated by russia.

and the Soviets would've stopped at Germany (they kinda invaded Poland).

I have no doubt you would be waving the sickle and hammer regardless.