Why are girls entering puberty at such a young age?

Facetious

Moderated
Oh damn right it's Monsanto! One of the most Freaking evil corporations on the planet!
I concur.
If I find out a product I've bought is from them, I immediately stop using it and return it and avoid them like the plague.
They're very difficult to evade these days . . .


ORGANIC GROWERS FIX GAZE ON LANDMARK SUIT AGAINST MONSANTO
Farmers assert the giant biotech was trying to corner and “own” world food production through patents on seeds
April 07, 2011


(MONROE, WA) --- If you’re an organic farmer here in the Sky Valley or elsewhere in Washington State, you are no doubt paying serious attention – as are your colleagues around the world – to the recent landmark lawsuit against Monsanto, the world’s largest seed and biotechnology company.

A landmark lawsuit filed on March 29 in US federal court seeks to invalidate Monsanto’s patents on “genetically modified” (GM) seeds and to prohibit the company from suing those whose crops become genetically contaminated by the Monsanto seeds.

The Public Patent Foundation (PUBPAT) filed suit on behalf of 270,000 people from sixty organic and sustainable businesses and trade associations, including thousands of certified-organic farmers.

In Organic Seed Growers and Trade Association, et al. v. Monsanto, et al. (U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, Case No. 11 CIV 2163), PUBPAT details the invalidity of any patent that “poisons people” and the environment, and that is not useful to society, two hallmarks of US patent law.

“This case asks whether Monsanto has the right to sue organic farmers for patent infringement if Monsanto’s transgenic seed or pollen should land on their property,” said Dan Ravicher, PUBPAT’s Executive Director. “It seems quite perverse that an organic farmer contaminated by transgenic seed could be accused of patent infringement, but Monsanto has made such accusations before and is notorious for having sued hundreds of farmers for patent infringement, so we had to act to protect the interests of our clients.”
It goes on . . .

We're all Monsanto's guinea pigs :ak47:
 

Mr. Daystar

In a bell tower, watching you through cross hairs.
The movie "Food INC." was pretty informative I found. Large piece on Monsanto and its' horrible practices...also meat plants and their labor practices etc...

They not only kill you on the inside they also undermine the economy. It's all pretty awesome. :/
 
I actually had this idea of happening back in like junior high or early high school. I believe it happens because they see a lot of sexuality everywhere (beauty mags, tv, etc.) and when they know guys react to that, they want that and I think their brains send a message to release hormones at an earlier age
 
I actually had this idea of happening back in like junior high or early high school. I believe it happens because they see a lot of sexuality everywhere (beauty mags, tv, etc.) and when they know guys react to that, they want that and I think their brains send a message to release hormones at an earlier age

Sexual images can perhaps influence behavior like experimentation or body image/self-esteem.

But not your genes. Puberty is regulated by genes which trigger after a period of maturation. Typically the sex organs will release the chemicals for further sexual maturation at the appropriate time; unless this is interrupted by outside factors like perhaps the chemicals in the food we eat. Much of this is determined in the womb.

Seeing images wont' change that. Before puberty sex is typically a curiosity and not a driving force. After puberty begins this obviously can change. However the desire (in heterosexuals) is typically to view images of the opposite sex. Your hypothesis would require women to be viewing pictures of other women and having a sexual reaction to them. Which would be homosexuality in some sense. Unless you're thinking it's like how women can "cycle" together; but that's again, based on hormones and proximity rather than viewing a woman who is cycling at the time.

The idea of images bringing on physical change like sexual puberty would be summed up as: "Correlation is not causality".

Not only in this case but it would apply to everything visual. For instance; movies, books and video games and violence.
 

meesterperfect

Hiliary 2020
I actually had this idea of happening back in like junior high or early high school. I believe it happens because they see a lot of sexuality everywhere (beauty mags, tv, etc.) and when they know guys react to that, they want that and I think their brains send a message to release hormones at an earlier age

now that's fucking interesting man.
so you're saying its psychosomatic?
interesting, I wonder if thats been studied or looked into because I believe it may have some merit.

Either way, girls bodies are maturing faster and their brains slower.........sounds like a recipe for disaster if you ask me.

Atar good post but if chemicals can stimulate genes why can't emotions which do cause chemical reactions in the body stimulate them as well?
You're probably right but maybe DJ is on to something.........or maybe just on something , I don't know.
 

SpexyAshleigh

Official Checked Star Member
Hormones in food - they inject our produce and animals with hormones to make them grow at an alarming rate for quick slaughtering and production - what makes you think that those very same hormones aren't making our children grow at alarming rates as well?
 

Rey C.

Racing is life... anything else is just waiting.
Exactly. In our time girls were mostly slim. None at my middle school or highschool were fat or chubby. Today the majority are fatty.

I've noticed that too. I took a friend to pick up her kid from elementary school a couple of years ago. I noticed that there was a huge number of chubby kids leaving the school - both boys and girls. I don't know much of anything about physiology. But my guess is the obesity problem is related to diet and lack of exercise and the early onset of puberty is more diet/chemical related.

When my dad raised beef cattle (up to the early 80's), growth hormones were almost unheard of. Now pigs, chickens and beef are full of that crap. I don't know, but it just seems logical to think that if you eat pork, chicken or beef, and the animal has been given something to dramatically accelerate its rate of maturity, it's probably going to affect the person eating it. :dunno:
 
Whoa, hold on about the milk, the dairy industry has been basically removing rBST from the supply for about the last 5-7 years. For many reasons:

1. It has a bad image, which hurts customer confidence.
2. We have too much milk in this country as is, and smaller dairy farmers are being forced out of business, to the benefit of mega dairies. Producing milk without rBST gets smaller farmers a premium price on their milk.
3. Farmers hate Monsanto

When you go to the store, check the labels on your milk, most of the containers at this point will carry a label that says something along the lines of "This milk was produced without supplemental Hormones".

Other animal products are following suit, as a way to make more money. Consumers want products produced without added hormones.

I have heard other theories that the crazy level of vegetable oil used in modern diets contributes to this a whole lot. Vegetable oil raises estrogen levels, which can start the progress toward puberty.

Also as a higher percentage of the population is overweight or obese, the appropriate body mass for the trigger of puberty is reached earlier. Fat stores in the body do crazy stuff.
 
I remember reading an article several years ago that said girs don't enter puberty until their body stores up enough fat to support a fetus, which is why extremly skinny girls (like professional gymnasts) don't enter puberty until much later, some being almost 20.
 
This is mostly due to higher fat diets, as girls puberty is affected by body fat levels amongst other factors.

http://www.everydiet.org/2027/obesity-early-puberty-girls

http://www.female-puberty.com/EarlyPubertyInGirls.html

This is the correct answer. I am not going to flat out say that growth hormones given to animals has nothing to do with this phenomenon, but science does not support that conclusion, at least YET. Higher fat diets, and children with more fat on their bones, is supported by science.
 

Arden Adamz

Official Checked Star Member
I've always been under the impression that it has to do with consumption of hormones, experimental techniques for farming, pesticides, and other chemicals we ingest one way or another... There is such an overwhelming population at this point... the demand for food has in turn created the demand for new processes. It's difficult to find food in the supermarket that hasn't been altered in some way for packaging, shipping, growth, appearance, or storage...
 

Arden Adamz

Official Checked Star Member
I've watched a few eye-opening documentaries, and read a bit about Monsanto... There's quite a lot of damning knowledge out there. It's certainly not every day that I think of my food as being political but I've started to put a lot more thought into how & what I consume since learning about the bull shit going on with our agriculture and food industries.
 
I've watched a few eye-opening documentaries, and read a bit about Monsanto... There's quite a lot of damning knowledge out there. It's certainly not every day that I think of my food as being political but I've started to put a lot more thought into how & what I consume since learning about the bull shit going on with our agriculture and food industries.

Gotta watch the sources of information you get that stuff from. There are ecocrazies out there that want to scare the shit out of you. As I said before the amount of hormones in animal products have been rolled back big time over the last 5-7 years. Not because of some scientific information that that says they aren't safe, but because consumers don't want them. Farmers hate Monsanto, and when given the option will use whatever product Monsanto isn't involved with.

As I said before look up estrogen puberty and vegetable oil on the internet. That stuff isn't sponsored by animal rights activists looking to scare you out of eating meat, with false information.
 
Top