Why All The Anal Stuff???

[neighborboy]

My girlfriend hates porn and she requested anal after we had been dating for about a year, so I doubt that interest in anal sex has anything to do with a porn industry "agenda." We continue to include it in our sex life and it gets her rocks off like you wouldn't believe. I'm in total agreement though that far too much of the anal sex in porn depicts rapid deep thrusting that is totally unrealistic and harmful if people come away from it thinking that's how it's supposed to be done.

 

[Blink]

I'm back. I decided last year that I wouldn't continue this effort, but here I am again. However, I will no longer maintain a web site with a collection of links to and quotes from medical sources ("The medical aspects of anal sex"). So, if anyone would like that to be updated one last time and uploaded somewhere, let me know via PM. I'll put that back into my signature, if FreeOnes allows linking to the upload site (RS is right out).


It seems that the mainstream media is finally reporting on the rise in the popularity of anal sex: "Study Reports Anal Sex on Rise Among Teens" (ABCNews, Dec. 10, 2008).

Recently, researchers at the Bradley Hasbro Children's Research Center in Rhode Island suggested that anal sex is on the rise among teens and young adults, particularly those who have unprotected vaginal sex.
...
[Megan] Carpentier said the dismantling of comprehensive sex education programs in the public schools is to blame for teen ignorance about the hazards of anal sex. And it is unrealistic to expect doctors to talk to teens about this touchy topic.
...
According to the Journal of Adolescent Health, rising rates of anal sex among teens is reflected in the general adult population where anal sex rates have doubled since 1995.

Unfortunately, the reliance on advice from people with no medical backgrounds continues...

"It really is shocking how many myths young people have about anal sex," said Judy Kuriansky, a Columbia University professor and author of "Sexuality Education: Past Present and Future."
...
Columbia's Kuriansky, author of "Generation Sex," has been hearing questions about anal sex from her college students for at least a decade...

Here's her biography @ SexualTherapy.com. It brings to mind the background of another non-medical "authority" on anal sex, Jack Morin (biography @ HarperCollins.com), who wrote a book about it and is still quoted in Wikipedia's article about it regarding incontinence: `[Dr. Morin] had never personally observed "loosening" in any of his patients.' (Why would a psychotherapist observe that in his patients? Did they go to him for their proctological exams? )

And, of course, there's Tristan Taormino, another "authority" with ... wait for it ... no medical background (Shocking, eh? Her biography at IMDB):

One speaker on the college circuit -- Tristan Taormino, author of "The Ultimate Guide to Anal Sex for Women" -- is gaining new ground with young women.

 

[Ceska]

Is this an undertone to a sort of homosexual agenda?

A conspiracy perhaps....

Furthermore, isn't it kind of similar to fucking a guy? I know, I know, a guy and a girl are different like night and day, but seriously, what you're fucking - an asshole - is essentially the same thing on a guy or a girl. I mean, it's a shithole.

Totally man! Like, that's exactly why I can't stand blowjobs. I mean guys have lips, and girls have lips - exact same thing. Ewwwww

Oh and handjobs from a girl. Yuck! Guys have hands and girls have hands. It's "essentially the same thing." Ewwwww

Further, what is it with you dudes that come on here and fuck girls in the asshole, watch that shit, engage in it, but go on and on about "fags" that want to have the same thing done to them? Don't you realize that's a steaming, stinky, pile of hypocritical bullshit in and of itself? I mean, like I said, it's essentially the same thing.

Exactly! Sooo hypocritical. These guys that come on here and watch girls give handjobs and blowjobs. That is sooo gay! Latent homosexuals all of them I tells ya! What a bunch of hypocrites!


Seriously, your hypocrite argument is nonsense. As for the poo poo thing you have a point. But I think any of the OCSM here will tell you, they clean themselves out with a vengeance beforehand. That's the only way to go. Otherwise it is not appealing at all. So if that's your reason for being opposed to it, this I can understand.

What I find really puzzling is that you felt the need to specifically identify pornstars that engage in or people who watch men have sex with women anally as latent homosexuals ... really quite a stretch ... I mean, aren't there other really popular threads that stand out a bit more to you like....

Hottest Shemale: - (almost 500,000 views and counting)

Would any of you guys have Sex with a Shemale? - (48% yes or maybe)

Do you (or would you) mind a girl rubbing your cock on another guys cock? - (155,000 views and only 31% say yes)

If you could suck your own penis would you? (most say yes)

Better candidates for your "homosexual conspiracy" ire than a guy wanting to hit a girl in the bootie I'd say. :2 cents:

 

[johnkewl]

Why don't you calm down with some nice relaxing anal sex

 

[cloudrunner64]

Why all the anal? Because anal is GREAT! Dont knock it till uv tried it bro.
Ur probably less experienced in relationships or u have grown up worrying u might 1 day be gay.
I think u need 2 be comfortable about urself first dude then you will discover some really amazing things about sex.

 

[Blink]

Seriously, [ninetysixcavy's] hypocrite argument is nonsense.

You must have missed the post ninetysixcavy made here exactly 11 months ago. He seemed to abandon the "homosexual agenda" angle, which was just fine with me. I simply continued on with the thread, as the initial question is good ("Why All The Anal Stuff????").

Perhaps I should choose other threads to bump, though.

 

[Ceska]

You must have missed the post ninetysixcavy made here exactly 11 months ago. He seemed to abandon the "homosexual agenda" angle, which was just fine with me. I simply continued on with the thread, as the initial question is good ("Why All The Anal Stuff????").

Perhaps I should choose other threads to bump, though.

I may have missed him saying that. I didn't read all the posts on this topic.

He doesn't seem to retract the "homosexual conspiracy" idea in the link you posted though. He is actually citing his source (to prove that he didn't come up with the notion completely by himself - which he already made clear in his first post - the same post in which he also made clear he agreed with the article).

Nonetheless he may have since abandoned the idea somewhere else (just not in that post).
Either way, no matter. I was just responding to the question he asked.

Is this an undertone to a sort of homosexual agenda? .....
I look forward to hearing your comments on the matter.

 

[Blink]

He doesn't seem to retract the "homosexual conspiracy" idea in the link you posted though.

What is there for him to retract? In the original post, he claimed that he read a comment in a magazine along the lines of "anal stuff is pandering to queers." Then he asked (among other things) whether or not people agreed with that. Which wasn't the greatest idea, granted, but he did raise some interesting points. Later on he seemed to lose interest in the whole thing, and apologized for making "tasteless" posts in the one I linked to.

Anyway, I don't agree at all that heterosexual anal sex has anything to do with a homosexual agenda or conspiracy. However, I do agree with the sentiment expressed by ninetysixcavy and others back on the first page that this craze is "troubling." And unfortunately, I understand it all too well...

 

[GabberMan]

Contrary to popular opinion anal sex among gay men is less common than among straight couples. I'm not into it and nor is my wife, but I'll occasonally watch an anal vid if it's done really nicely.

Apart from that the bum serves two functions only: breaking wind and doing no.2s.

 

[Ceska]

What is there for him to retract? ...

The same thing there is for him to abandon...

He seemed to abandon the "homosexual agenda" angle, which was just fine with me....

I think you are picking on my words. Sorry I was imprecise.
If you prefer to substitute your word abandon for retract... feel free.
I concede whatever you want. :bowdown: I would rather you continue to inform the public about the medical consequences of anal sex than for us to continue to speculate on a third person's current opinion of his questions in his own original post.

... this craze is "troubling." And unfortunately, I understand it all too well...

I don't doubt that for a moment. You seem absolutely obsessed with the topic.
The research involved in digging up the quotes in the following post is proof enough, perhaps even inspired. Did you find any quotes of pornstars speaking positively about the experience?

Oh, okay. If you want anecdotes from porn stars who have received a lot of rough anal sex, then you shall have them:

 

[Blink]

If you prefer to substitute your word abandon for retract... feel free.

I wasn't using them interchangeably. I was thinking retract as in "I was wrong; I recant" and abandon as in "I lost interest and gave up."

Did you find any quotes of pornstars speaking positively about the experience?

I may have. However:

"Whether or not it's pleasurable for the recipient is irrelevant. Anal sex is a very risky activity from a physical damage standpoint alone. The repeated and rough variety in particular should not be so prevalent." (Post 129 in this thread)

NB: I would appreciate it if you would read through the entire thread first, or at least the last few pages.

 

[Ceska]

"Whether or not it's pleasurable for the recipient is irrelevant. Anal sex is a very risky activity from a physical damage standpoint alone. The repeated and rough variety in particular should not be so prevalent." (Post 129 in this thread)

NB: I would appreciate it if you would read through the entire thread first, or at least the last few pages.

Naaaa. Not interesting enough to read every single one of 150+ posts.

As for the last few pages .. sure, why not.
Just because people aren't reciting your quotes doesn't mean they didn't read them. You will be pleased to know that I did already read post #129. It was answered quite eloquently (as I'm sure you already know) by post #134.

Damn straight. Missionary only. Anything else might be dangerous. I even have my condoms inspected by an independent auditor prior to sex. Safety is paramount, let pleasure be put on the back burner. Remember: Sex (much like this thread) is a NO-FUN ZONE!!!!! :hammer:

God, just thinking about all that safety makes me so fucking horny!!!!

Have fun informing the masses. :wave2:

 

[Blink]

You will be pleased to know that I did already read post #129. It was answered quite eloquently (as I'm sure you already know) by post #134.

Hardly. senob44's response does not negate the quite numerous and significant risks associated with repeated and rough anal sex, nor does it address in any way the continued ignorance about and increasing demand for that (amongst more extreme activities).

(As an aside, it's too bad that we can't link to other forums here; I'd point out voluminous real-world examples of serious, chronic anal problems caused by anal sex and persistent demand for more, and more extreme, anal activities.)

Have fun informing the masses.

"Fun" isn't the word that I would use to describe this. But I'm not going to give you more ammo to attack me with, nor will I waste more time referring back to old posts of mine. I'm done with you now, even if you insist on having the last word.

 

[TheIntruder]

can i suggest http://www.analresized.com/ ? ehehehe

 

[TrueTranssexual]

Well, the first time I tried anal, I didn't like it. The second time I did it, I loved it; it was with a guy that was pretty big, but he prepared me very well and I didn't feel any pain but lots lots of pleasure. Anal sex can be very addictive when doing it with the right person.

 

[Blink]

I'm back. I decided last year that I wouldn't continue this effort, but here I am again. However, I will no longer maintain a web site with a collection of links to and quotes from medical sources ("The medical aspects of anal sex").

After some reflection, that wasn't such a great thing to say. It's rather tedious to refer back to old posts of mine all the time. Consequently, I've updated and hosted "The medical aspects of anal sex" once again on a free web host.

 

[mikexmoran]

There is something about a beautiful and classy woman who will take it in the ass.

Rachel Ryan

http://www.classicstarlets.com/pornstars/rachel-ryan/penny-morgan/index03.html

 

[kajsa]

exactly
they are suppressed homos
refuse anal be a real man

 

[Born2Jizz]

In MY opinion, I like anal with women because It's so dirty. Plus I'm pretty sexist, so I like the dominance factor involved with a chick letting me put it in her ass. Idk, it makes the girl seem like a whole new level of slut, which TOTALLY turns me on. But hey, that's just me! :dunno:


Lol "Why all the anal stuff"... :1orglaugh
*noob*

 

[phanto_1985]

I love anal, when i watch porn, people who hate it doesn't bother me; everybody got their own preferences and fantasies in sexuality. However, i would not tolerate someone switches off my PC while i'm watching anal.Fortunately, the distance solves this case, so you can keep arguing about it.