Legzman said:
I think job by definition = underpayed and shit on daily!!!
I've had excellent jobs when I used to be an employee for 3+ years. Then again, most of those were as an engineering in an engineering firm -- it's hard for people to BS their way through engineering with engineers. And any engineering company that uses non-engineers as managers doesn't last long.
But that was the '90s.
Today I've been doing technology for far too long. And the world is completely different there. You have a mis-mesh of accounting, business, marketing, technology and, if you're lucky, an occasional engineer whose managed to deal with them. So that's why I've done it as a consultant on fixed contracts. And when something is totally BS, I can end it early without regret -- especially if it's well outside the terms of my contract and repeat request to stay focused or redefine that contract aren't addressed.
I wish more Americans realize that you shouldn't have a "job," you should have a "career." And one of the best ways to get that is to work for yourself.
Legzman said:
but then again if work was fun they'd charge admission at the door!
Exactly.
One thing you always have to keep in mind is that someone is paying for your time. So you had better be delivering more value in that time than they pay for it. That simple logic defines why and how I do everything!
If your boss or supervisor pisses you off constantly, don't focus on how they treat you. Focus on how much your boss or supervisor prevents you from delivering value to the company. Because if you make that argument, then your boss/supervisor's superiors will understand that your concerns are to put the company's interests first.
I've typically found that this is much easier to do as a consultant. If you have no ties to the company, there is no "he just wants my job" rebuttle from the supervisor like they often do with regards to subordinates. I've seen massive waste and clusterfucks when it comes to people who can't manage or just don't have the technical skill set to manage those under them. And sometimes they make the mistake of crossing that threshold with me.
Because when I have a signed contract to complete specific duties, I am liable to complete those duties. And I'm going to be damned if someone's ego, incompetence or other self-inflicted non-sense is going to get in the way of that. Now I can swallow my pride, I can take yelling and cursing, I can take all the blame for when things go wrong -- but I can't take someone impeding my work constantly and preventing me from helping the company. And when I put it in those terms, with great reservation and only when absolutely required, I am listened to.
I'm considered the absolute nicest and professional individual at every single firm I've been at. But about 3-4 months in, one person will cross a threshold. I give them plenty of opportunities, but at some point, they will start pointing the finger at me for their errors. And that's when my extensive documentation comes out -- which pretty much eliminates any repudiation. From there, it's really about how prideful they are and how much they want to really work to change.
In fact, the most common complaint my last supervisor made about me was, "why doesn't he ever get upset?" I don't get upset, but I do get results one way or another. Luckily, he was clueless, so most of us were able to by-pass him and most people just used me as their management-level conduit. Especially since I took all the yelling and cursing with a smile (which only pissed my supervisor off more).