What They Need In Porn Nowadays

Aces&Jacks

Retired Mod
Plain and simple, more EROTICISM.

Scenes with some emotional content that keeps your attention so you are not fast-forwarding to get to the next scene. For some reason American gonzo makers are not able to inject some eroticism with hardcore sex.
 

jod0565

Member, you member...
In gonzo - they need to do away with the interviews and "The Hand" coming into camera's view to feel up the girl.
Gonzo can be made with a lame storyline instead of the same old interview crap.
The industry needs to gag or ban Wesley Pipes - if you know his scenes, you know what I mean.
They need to not show guys jerk off for five minutes before coming.
They need to never show a guys face.
They need to never have a girl work with a soft dick.
They need to keep the camera steady for a least two seconds without jumping back and forth to the gals face then a close up of the penetration.

Most of my "complaints" stem from the gonzo style of shooting - and yes, I know it means just grab a camera and go, but it still can be done with style, IMO.
 
B/G Scenes
= > cut out the cheesy background music - if you really must insist tho, less is more, IMHO
= > better transition between positions or preferably none at all - cold cutting from one position to another is not good, it's just annoying

Lesbian Scenes
= > More proper kissing - 5 seconds of stoopid tongue play does not count.

generally, like jod says, less interviews & cameraguy interaction, (unless he is actually the partner), & for the love of ..... no blooming narration, just let them get on with it. :D
 
********** said:
D-Rock, I think porn needs more Priya Rai. :)


As a HUGE Priya fan, I gotta say that I would loved to have seen her do more explict work.

What I hate in porn these days, is the gonzo flicks. The guys are always just so funky looking and sometimes they act like it's their first time fucking. I think what porn needs is dudes in porn that know their role, and slow that role. We buy it for the girls. I hate it when the dude tries to up stage the girls performance.
 
More slapstick comedy..

Think about it..Custard pies as well as cream pies.:D
 
I've read every post on this thread and the answer to almost every comment is to check out anything produced by Andrew Blake.

The women (and even the guys) he has are unquestionably beautiful, there are no fake annoying orgasm sounds or cheesy shit music. As a matter of fact, he doesn't even allow the idiotic sounds of any of the participants to make it on film. All the scenes have tasteful erotic background music, with an occasional moan from the chick thrown in there. The budgets are huge, the sets always lavish, often filmed in mansions, private jets, etc. The camera work is superb, with multiple angles, panning around the scene with stylish editing. His films never have that annoying 10 minutes straight of nothing but a huge close up of the cock pounding the pussy. The whole scene is filmed, giving the viewer plenty of opportunity to see the whole women, her entire body, and most importantly he captures the heat that he is a master of coaxing out of his performers.

Althought there is a fair share of anal, it is not the dominant theme like it is in so many of today's movies. It's more like real life, used more of an added "spice" or special touch to a scene. No nasty anal creampies of shit like that but again, Blake somehow manages to make ass-to-mouth appear to be a loving act committed by two people who are passionate for each other.

Blake also has always had the best female masturbation scenes by far. Off the top of my head, many smoking hot solo sessions come to mind: Tori Welles, Savannah, Raquel Darrian, Zara Whites, Paula Price, Ashlyn Gere, Dahlia Grey, etc. have all graced my TV screen in some of the hottest diddling I've ever seen.

He NEVER shows the guys face and certainly never shows the idiot jerking off like a madman for two minutes before he comes. Every cumshot is in the girl's mouth and on her face, but he manages to always make it look incredibly erotic. Slow motion and dramatic music is often used to capture the magnitude of the money shot. Somehow he always manages to make a woman getting blasted in the face into an artistic experience, not the trashy slut experience that so much porn seems to be.

The lesbian scenes are second to none. Blake does not miss the soft eroticism that is unique to two women passionately making love to each other. Plenty of attention is paid to the set up of the scene - the soft kissing, the progression of the touching, culminating in a tasteful menagerie of ass eating and dildo plunging. This is the guy, after all, who brought us the historical "Ice Dildo" scene with Janine and Julia Ann (Hidden Obessions).

And lastly, the women are never choked, spit on, called a whore , smacked in the ass, or degraded in any way. To the contrary, Blake's style of making pornography elevates the woman, making her the center of attention, to be adored by all who are watching. I wish more porn was made this way.

I encourage you all to check out some of his work, you will not be dissappointed. Pay attention though, he makes alot of girl only stuff so if that's not your thing (not mine either) make sure that's not what you're getting.
 
More female directors ;)


Aces&Jacks said:
Plain and simple, more EROTICISM.

Scenes with some emotional content that keeps your attention so you are not fast-forwarding to get to the next scene. For some reason American gonzo makers are not able to inject some eroticism with hardcore sex.

I have to agree with Aces&Jacks.
 
Peter Gazinya said:
I've read every post on this thread and the answer to almost every comment is to check out anything produced by Andrew Blake.

I tried to like Andrew Blake. I've own quite a few of his flicks like High Heels, Playthings....actually I can't remember the names. I've owned like 10 of his movies. I like his "artsy" direction and whatnot. I love that the girl is the center of attention. I love that women are truely beautiful and they usually wear some cool fashions and lots of stockings. The ONLY thing that gets to me about his flicks, is that time and time again there seems to be no real climax to some of his scenes. It's like, this shit is real fucking arrousing (Arroused, wasn't that one of his movies too), but in the end, I'm let unsatified.
But maybe it's just the features that I watched.
 
stop playing with "animals".....and more cumshot from the girls...
virgin vidoes is the best but..hard to see it on DVDs...new porn industry should work on that....
 
Top