If the blogger Ryan Tate was fair, he'd be using sources other than the Daily Mail tabloid in order to gather his information. Furthermore, Mr. Tate doesn't make any mention of Apple competitors resourcing the exact means of slave labor in order to meet their production demands... could Apple really be the only ''offender''?
Mr. Tate.... are you a nasty-negative 'ol curmudgeon?
Considering that these have been publicly known things for some time and have been stated by numerous reputable sources and the validity of them isn't being disputed by anybody, even people that like Jobs, it's not like all the bad things that were stated about Jobs and Apple are being made up here.
As far as anybody else doing it, they might be, but condoning the acts of one person or group because other people do it is akin to trying to say that two wrongs make a right which they don't.
Jobs was basically a very VERY good marketing person, and often a ruthless businessman. (Of course “righteous successful businessman” is an almost oxymoronic statement considering they pretty much don't exist just like “ruthless“ or “unethical businessman” is almost a redundant statement.) His technical knowhow wasn't that great. We wasn't a great engineer or software developer at any time in his career, though he didn't mind taking credit for other's work. His broad ideas were often overrated. He didn't really develop computers or anything else, others he worked for did. He basically told others what to do and got the glory for it. I personally even think most of Apples more recent products have been overrated and not worth the premium cost they often have compared to their utility. They have been held together by brand name recognition, it's clique base of fans that want to seem cool and don't know any better, and some of the best marketing in recent history, not the products actual quality.
I don't know about others but when a person's good qualities amount to being good at marketing, which might be one of the lowest forms of legal profession on the planet right next to used car salesman, politician, and shady lawyer, and a CEO who made some shareholders a lot of money I don't really consider that a great benefit to humanity at all. It doesn't make up for running one of the biggest sweatshops on the planet by proxy, and literally destroying the livelihoods of people both personally and through his company.
Somebody making a lot of money for themselves and some others isn't a good standard to judge the worth of a person.
No, his good qualities don’t begin to make up for the harm he has done to people. The only way to think so would be to value material goods at any cost, cash, and shiny toys more than the well being of other people. Some of the bad things he did weren't just minor blips on the radar.