Nightfly said:Folks: I didn't post anything that was not publicly available and accessible. welshchick published her MSN ID here (it's still in her FOs profile) and all anyone had to do was read her MSN profile where she posted her blog's page and her Photobucket pics/link, etc. Same thing goes for 001. His welshchick gallery link is tied to a Photobucket accout, and all one has to do is click around to see all the other pics he's hosted there. This is NOT rocket science.
If you post a photo album online and share your ID with +/-14,000 people on a hugely popular and well-trafficked message board, plus have a thread devoted solely to you which is bumped over and over by buddies, what sort of reasonable expectation of privacy is there, after all? Sending a picture of yourself to someone via PM or IM is one thing, and confidences are to be respected and never betrayed, but having entire galleries floating around online entitles anyone to see them and link to them.
:2 cents:
I will have to disagree with you. It is not because you see a gallery of someone online (in this particular case welschchick) that it entitles you to post his or her gallery unless you have a written permission not an oral permission. Another thing it was probably against her will to post these galleries and she didn't ask you to do that as far as I know. Don't give me the argument because it is online I can post it, no and no:nono:.
For me when you don't have a written permission to post pics of someone you don't have to post them.
But that is my personal opinion :2 cents: