Watergate 2.0 in Progress

SPECIAL COUNSEL ASKS FBI TO INVESTIGATE ‘FALSE’ SEX ALLEGATIONS AGAINST ROBERT MUELLER
https://dailycaller.com/2018/10/30/fbi-false-claims-robert-mueller/

Jack Burkman’s claims against Mueller
https://thepoliticalinsider.com/uns...nt=265680b20e543dc2a6473c7b9fa19141&source=CI

MARK MEADOWS ASKS FISA COURT JUDGE TO INVESTIGATE FBI APPLICATIONS TO SPY ON TRUMP AIDE
https://dailycaller.com/2018/10/31/...ush&utm_source=daily_caller&utm_campaign=push

MUELLER TEAM REPORTEDLY INTERVIEWED STEve Bannon ON FRIDAY FOR A SECOND TIME
https://www.dailycaller.com/2018/10/30/mueller-bannon-roger-stone/
 
Last edited:

Supafly

Retired Mod
Bronze Member
The replacement IS a major step - but it rather is what looks like the next step into Trump's attempt to shut down a prosecution against himself.

And with what not only the Mueller Probe has gathered, Trump would have been indicted already, were he not the president, right now. If he makes the move of trying to get Mueller either fired or the Probe stopped by force, he just shovels on another major crime.


I guess we will see some kind of big step soon, because we know Trump wants the probe to go away, for fear of what he knows he is guilty of.
 
“ another major crime”.
*lol*

This thread is the messageboard equivalent of picking your boogers and somebody sees you eating them.
 
The replacement IS a major step - but it rather is what looks like the next step into Trump's attempt to shut down a prosecution against himself.

And with what not only the Mueller Probe has gathered, Trump would have been indicted already, were he not the president, right now. If he makes the move of trying to get Mueller either fired or the Probe stopped by force, he just shovels on another major crime.


I guess we will see some kind of big step soon, because we know Trump wants the probe to go away, for fear of what he knows he is guilty of.

The mueller probe should never have been authorized but with this new AG, it is going to end sooner or later and that is justified. All this russian bs collusion was fabricated and you know it.
 

Supafly

Retired Mod
Bronze Member
And another, small-looking, but significant, issue:

The WH (Sarah Sanders) tweeting a coctored video on an official twitter account of the WH


Just rying to create the violent image where it was not
 
And another, small-looking, but significant, issue:

The WH (Sarah Sanders) tweeting a coctored video on an official twitter account of the WH


Just rying to create the violent image where it was not

Now imagine that was a Fox News reporter and an Obama White House intern.

Just shut up.
 

Ace Boobtoucher

Founder and Captain of the Douchepatrol
The replacement IS a major step - but it rather is what looks like the next step into Trump's attempt to shut down a prosecution against himself.

And with what not only the Mueller Probe has gathered, Trump would have been indicted already, were he not the president, right now. If he makes the move of trying to get Mueller either fired or the Probe stopped by force, he just shovels on another major crime.

I guess we will see some kind of big step soon, because we know Trump wants the probe to go away, for fear of what he knows he is guilty of.

This isn't East Germany. A crime must have been committed in order to investigate, charge, and try an individual. The mentality of "Show me a man and I'll find what he's guilty of..." is antithetical to American Jurisprudence and a wholly unconstitutional waste of time and money. Show me something other than RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIA. Which everyone knows is nothing. Even if there was collusion, it is not a criminal offense. And then what do those stupid cunts have other than he's mean to snowflakes and Jim Acosta? BFD. I would push through the next AG appointment post haste and instruct him to fire Mueller and start the investigation into Hilldebeast's emails; money laundering and whatever other malfeasance they can find.
 

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
This isn't East Germany. A crime must have been committed in order to investigate, charge, and try an individual. The mentality of "Show me a man and I'll find what he's guilty of..." is antithetical to American Jurisprudence and a wholly unconstitutional waste of time and money.

Doesn't square with..

This isn't East Germany. A crime must have been committed in order to investigate, charge, and try an individual. The mentality of "Show me a man and I'll find what he's guilty of..." is antithetical to American Jurisprudence and a wholly unconstitutional waste of time and money.

Trying to have it both ways. Won't work anyway, dat congressional oversight. Don't be a fucking clown.
 

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
I tend to believe identical posts tend to square nicely.

Not when you're trying to fight off investigations of Trump in one breath then calling for investigations of Hillary in the next, at least not to any normal, sane, and logical constituent, but of course Trumptards are low info and low IQ and an increasingly shrinking minority, so in that context, sure, it squares perfectly. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
A low info voter wouldn’t recognize the difference between an obvious crime and probable cause as is the case with Hillary Clinton and no established crime as with the Mueller witch hunt.

As Ace correctly pointed out.

Oops.
 
Top