Was porn better before?

I'm usually the first person to call people on it when they get nostalgic but did porn used to be made better before?

Maybe with no internet and actual VHS sales they had proper budgets.

I remember porn that was one and a half to 2 hours long and in which they spent about 3 x 15 minutes actually having sex and the rest involves some guy travelling in time to find his kidnapped son.

Porn has become so refined

Now Every single movie has the exact same script. The scene starts with the girl. She sucks the guys dick for about 15 minutes. He then fucks her for about 45 seconds and then he cums on her face followed by the camera zooming in on the guys face*


It's like they refined it down to its basic parts. I mean we watch porn for the sex scenes but it's become to refined now. It's sort of like that Cherry on top of a a piece of pie. You love it because there's just a tiny one per pie but now porn is alike a plate full of those cherries and you no longer appreciate them.



*That's another point.

Why is there so much focus on the guy? Why does the camera need to zoom in on his face as he moans like a chick all the time? No one cares about the guy. You are not a star. No one knows your name. people don't care about the adventures of "Michael iron-rod. The man who likes big asses... Watch the next episode as Mike goes out to get some big asses" Male porn stars are not super heroes. We don't care about their back story or preferences. We just tolerate them until the lesbian scene starts or the girl gets into a position where we can watch her fuck without the guys face on screen.

Which brings me to another point. Is there some huge majority who enjoys watching another man get blown to warrant these lengthy blow job scenes in every single movie? or are they just there "because"

The next part is just personal preference but I hate it when they ruin proper lesbian scenes by kicking a guy in there.


It's like the scene starts well. Girls snuggle and giggle. Bring out the oil and start massaging each other and then a guy falls into the scene like the director kicked him in there. The girls then suck his dick and we get to watch a whole movie of him having a good time.

I don't like too many dudes in my porn. To me watching another guy fuck a girl is like watching a man eat a pizza when I'm hungry. There's no longer anything left for the imagination.

proper lesbian porn leaves you going "Mmmm I'd sure like a piece of that" then they add a guy to the scene and it's like "Damn... That guy stole my piece."
 
Yes, porn was indeed a lot better 15+ years ago. Most of the time it was more sensual and erotic, and you didn't feel like you were watching a couple of mindless robots that didn't give a crap go at it. Not too mention they laid off a lot more with the absurd gimmicks they like to put in most porn now.
 
Yes, porn was indeed a lot better 15+ years ago. Most of the time it was more sensual and erotic, and you didn't feel like you were watching a couple of mindless robots that didn't give a crap go at it. Not too mention they laid off a lot more with the absurd gimmicks they like to put in most porn now.

That's my point!

What happened to the sensual girls? The ones where you weren't even sure if you where going to get to see her naked in the first place. Now its man + woman. Give us money.
 
You mean before it was flooded with high gloss big budgeted big production Cinemax type bad comedic parody flicks featuring moderately attractive women with over-blown boob-jobs and random bad biker tattoos?

Or maybe you mean before it was bogged down with male talent douchebags committing pseudo-rape and giving gangbangs to 18 and 19 year old hookers while talking shit to the camera mid-jerk off and calling it 'reality porn'. Is that what you meant???

If so, I'd say yes... it was better before.
 
I have watched antique porn before...and I got bored at how long it took them to get to sex...it'd take about 16 or something minutes just for the actors to start to have sex. D'you know how many times I almost got caught when I was a kid? And the quality...oh the quality...

My point being, I prefer today's porn.
 
I enjoy all eras of porn since the 80's stuff I started watching to the current stuff. And I actually prefer the newer stuff. It's more explicit which is what I like to watch.
 
Some things were better in the old days and some things are better now. I like the technology they have now. Porn is a lot more accessable now. You don't have to hang around with a bunch of trench coated pervs in the back of a video store. You also don't have to worry about Pee Wee Herman jerking off on the back of your neck in a nasty, stinky porn theatre showing scratchy looking films.

Now days the videos are clearer, the lighting and sound are much better, and the internet allows us to find a ton of different things.

The only thing I miss are the girls from back in the 80's and 90's. You got real tits, a bush, and seldom saw all the piercings and tats you see these days. Maybe it's just my personal preferences, but the women back in those days seemed a lot more real than what I see today.

What it all means is that the quality of the porn is better these days. You just have to look a little harder to find the old school look to the women if that's your thing.
 
The technology to make and deliver it is better now. The problem is actual substance of it definitely isn't. Just like the sex might be "nastier" now, but that doesn't make it good. In fact I think it's just turned sex into a joke. I don't know, in a way I think the old slightly grainier stuff back in the 80s and 90s was still more well done. The technology wasn't as good but the people knew how to use what they had better, and while they weren't masters of cinema by any stretch of the imagination the artistic direction they did have was still much better and more thought out. Now the producers of porn use technology as a crutch to have talentless hacks put out something to cover their inadequacies and incompetence.

I have watched antique porn before...and I got bored at how long it took them to get to sex...it'd take about 16 or something minutes just for the actors to start to have sex. D'you know how many times I almost got caught when I was a kid? And the quality...oh the quality...

My point being, I prefer today's porn.

They might get to the sex faster, but the make so many scenes so long time with mindless repetition I wouldn't be surprised if people skip over more than half of the actual sex now and not just all the non sex parts. In that way it's worse. Plus, with the medium they have today skipping over parts isn't like what it used to be. People don't have to spend half an hour fast forwarding. Now they can just click a mouse and have the spot come up instantly if that's what they want.

People that want a little bit of a setup can't get it, let along the eroticness I mentioned earlier. (I'm talking about a real setup not that stupid stuff most gonzo crap uses.) However, people that don't care can easily skip over it so it doesn't really effect them. The people that don't like junk get screwed now.

As far as the performers are concerned, there is a reason why there are a large number of them from the past that are still well regarded and thought of today. While there will be some adult models active around this time that will be remembered well into the future, as for the pornstars, nearly all the "stars" of today, they won't have anybody giving a shit about them in 10 or 20 years, let along having people remembering who the hell they are. They will just be some abandoned memory in a computer out in the corner of a garage or on some meaningless DVD in a middle of a landfill. Just as there is a reason people remember the stars of the past there's a reason nobody is going to care enough to remember the "stars" of today. If there are more than a couple of them that are thought of as well in the future as the pornstars of the past are thought of now I will be surprised.
 
Did you ever think that maybe you just stopped buying actual porn films and just started watching everything free online so you dont see any actual whole movies anymore?

And as far as them zooming up on the guys face I havent seen much of this but you go on and on about who wants to see the guy these arent the days of ron jeremy when they dont matter at all which I think is a good thing because who really wants to see a disgusting guy fucking a really hot chick. Not most people and especially not women who are more and more getting into porn
 

meesterperfect

Hiliary 2020
its simply the quantity.
with internet porn scenes have probably increased 1000%, probably more.
therefore before a woman needed to be exceptional.
today with all the quantity, although there are some very sexy women still, all you really need is a vagina and the willingness.
hence, the overall quality has gone down.
 

maildude

Postal Paranoiac
Whatever happened to those hot porn cards you used to get in packs with bubble gum? I used to have five Christy Canyons!
 
My first memories of seeing porn were the old 80s numbes and on alot of levels I prefer them to some of the modern crap. Back then it was just people having sex (albeit more graphic than in your own bedroom) but it was just two (or more) people enjoyng themselves and one another.

A DP scene was a rare gem and a girl who swallowed was near unheard of, majority of the guys were not hung like donkeys and knew how to genuinely pleasure a woman who was either an oscar nominee or actually getting off! Low quality and a little dodgy, but there was no showing off, I get sick of scenes where a guy is fucking a girl, stops, pulls out his cock so the cameraman can get a close up of her colon or womb!

Ah the days before the crap boob job and trout pout mouth! Those were so much better, yes you have some startling women now adays, but how many have body parts that dont have a factory warranty!

No one can say yes or no really to the question, its personal choice. I might like a plot, a good sex scene, some tacky acting, you might like a gaping asshole. Each to their own!
 
Top