The Russian are building 8 Borei class submarines. The Russians build a new class of SSBN and SLBM when they need to starting replacing Delta IV class.
U. S.Nuclear Forces rearmament programs
- Thread starter spacearrow99
- Start date
The Russian are building 8 Borei class submarines. The Russians build a new class of SSBN and SLBM when they need to starting replacing Delta IV class.
meesterperfect
Hiliary 2020
Yeah, the cost of Medicare ansd social security is a heavy burden on the budget and because of that, the US can't give the military the money they need to buy all the stuff they need...
Define "need".
The Federal government's charge is to provide for the common defense, not feed and clothe the poor.
You are not thinking this through.
It's not an entitlement issue. Actually it is because people are entitled to keep the money that's theirs.
Here's how it works:
The GOV wants more stuff-They ask for the money-But the GOV doesn't have the money-So they ask the private bank called The Federal Reserve which is owned by trillioniares who control the money supply to almost every country in the world to "print" some money out of thin air with nothing to back it up and loan it to them with interest.
The Federal Reserve says ok and adds that amount to the national debt and the GOV gets their stuff.
And people alive now as well as people who haven't even been born yet get to pay it back.
The GOV gets their stuff. The trillioniares get a little richer and The People's lives suck a little more.
It's got nothing to do with The GOV feeding or clothing anyone.
What Ike meant by the military industrial complex is more true today than ever.
Here's how it works.
THe GOV creates a boogeyman using the mainstream media as it's propaganda machine to manipulate The Peoples feelings.
Then The Politicians decide to attack, invade, plunder and destroy a particular place where the boogeyman lives.
With that comes many huge government contracts worth billions and trillions over time.
The Politicians decide who gets those contracts through bribes paid through a money laundering device like The Clinton Foundation.
The busineses who get the multi billions dollar contracts then show their appreciation to the Politicians for choosing by giving back the Politicians some of that money.
And the cycle goes round and round..........many people die and the world gets shitier.
But the bankers, the businesses, and the Politicians who just so happen to be mass murdering psychopaths make a lot of money.
So at the end of the day it's all worth it.
Define "need".
The Federal government's charge is to provide for the common defense, not feed and clothe the poor.
You are not thinking this through.
It's not an entitlement issue. Actually it is because people are entitled to keep the money that's theirs.
Here's how it works:
The GOV wants more stuff-They ask for the money-But the GOV doesn't have the money-So they ask the private bank called The Federal Reserve which is owned by trillioniares who control the money supply to almost every country in the world to "print" some money out of thin air with nothing to back it up and loan it to them with interest.
The Federal Reserve says ok and adds that amount to the national debt and the GOV gets their stuff.
And people alive now as well as people who haven't even been born yet get to pay it back.
The GOV gets their stuff. The trillioniares get a little richer and The People's lives suck a little more.
It's got nothing to do with The GOV feeding or clothing anyone.
What Ike meant by the military industrial complex is more true today than ever.
Here's how it works.
THe GOV creates a boogeyman using the mainstream media as it's propaganda machine to manipulate The Peoples feelings.
Then The Politicians decide to attack, invade, plunder and destroy a particular place where the boogeyman lives.
With that comes many huge government contracts worth billions and trillions over time.
The Politicians decide who gets those contracts through bribes paid through a money laundering device like The Clinton Foundation.
The busineses who get the multi billions dollar contracts then show their appreciation to the Politicians for choosing by giving back the Politicians some of that money.
And the cycle goes round and round..........many people die and the world gets shitier.
But the bankers, the businesses, and the Politicians who just so happen to be mass murdering psychopaths make a lot of money.
So at the end of the day it's all worth it.
SSC-X-8 (SSC-8) The U.S. missile defense system in Europe uses Strike length Mark 41 vls. Those vls can also launch tomahawk cruise missile. The strike length Mark 41 vls are a violation under the INF Treaty. The article below does not mention the U. S. violation of the INF Treaty.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/14/world/europe/russia-cruise-missile-arms-control-treaty.html?_r=0
A decision by Moscow to operationally deploy the SSC-X-8 would effectively render the INF Treaty obsolete (Russia could perhaps use a limited deployment as a negotiating tool to extract some form of US concession, in return for withdrawing the system, thus preserving the Treaty). A Russian withdrawal from the INF Treaty would enable Moscow to deploy a robust ground-launched long-range strike capability, complementing its investment in air and sea-launched systems. In this respect, a Russian withdrawal from the INF Treaty, although resulting in a renewed nuclear threat akin to that posed by such systems as the SS-20 of the 1980s, would be magnified by the potential for Russia to pose a theatre-level conventional precision-strike capability. As previously noted, the Iskander system can likely be upgraded to pose a threat at ranges of 1,000 (ballistic missile) to 2,000 km (cruise missile), whilst the SSC-X-8 also poses a theatre-level threat. The new Russian intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), the RS-26 Rubezh, a two-stage derivative of the three-stage RS-24 Yars ICBM, may also represent an INF breakout system.
http://www.defenceiq.com/air-land-a...ian-strategy-and-the-evolving-anti-accessarea
The author of this article intentionally did not discuss Club K missile system. The Russians defense industry is massive, and NATO defense companies waste to much money.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/14/world/europe/russia-cruise-missile-arms-control-treaty.html?_r=0
A decision by Moscow to operationally deploy the SSC-X-8 would effectively render the INF Treaty obsolete (Russia could perhaps use a limited deployment as a negotiating tool to extract some form of US concession, in return for withdrawing the system, thus preserving the Treaty). A Russian withdrawal from the INF Treaty would enable Moscow to deploy a robust ground-launched long-range strike capability, complementing its investment in air and sea-launched systems. In this respect, a Russian withdrawal from the INF Treaty, although resulting in a renewed nuclear threat akin to that posed by such systems as the SS-20 of the 1980s, would be magnified by the potential for Russia to pose a theatre-level conventional precision-strike capability. As previously noted, the Iskander system can likely be upgraded to pose a threat at ranges of 1,000 (ballistic missile) to 2,000 km (cruise missile), whilst the SSC-X-8 also poses a theatre-level threat. The new Russian intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), the RS-26 Rubezh, a two-stage derivative of the three-stage RS-24 Yars ICBM, may also represent an INF breakout system.
http://www.defenceiq.com/air-land-a...ian-strategy-and-the-evolving-anti-accessarea
The author of this article intentionally did not discuss Club K missile system. The Russians defense industry is massive, and NATO defense companies waste to much money.
Similar threads
