Since I've taken the time to critique most posts in this thread, I'm going use this post to catch-up on some great, past posts. In some cases, I'm going to re-quote some into other threads. Please don't take offense.
In reality, I'd love to have
just one thread for all of these beauties! In fact,
this thread was designed to be that "single thread." But since some people classify curves differently, I created a couple of others. I will refer back to them as appropriately.
To highlight this example, let's start with a post I previously critiqued ...
Denise milani is better than kim kardashian
I think both belong in my
Thin (not full) fucking hips thread. I mean these women are extremely thin, then with fucking hips, no so much full in body.
http://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?t=164618
I know there is a lot of confusion and a lot of overlap. But I started the other thread for people who want thinner women with killer, fanging hips than the full figured women with the ultra-wide body and hips I love.
On pure beauty, I'm going to start apply an universal standard. My cock gets hard to the same length for the most part, and if I a woman gets me hard fairly fast, I consider her "equivalent" to any other. In this regard, Denise and Kim are fucking hot and I'm going to get hard very fast. That's why I started this thread, because "fucking hips" looking like they
should take a load inside of them and just scream "breed me" make me fucking hard very fast.
Now let's get analytical ...
- Denise Milani -- 32-19-34 on a 5'4" frame
- Kim Kardashian -- 36-26-40 on a 5'3" frame
Now I've typically tried to apply a "reference" on what is "thin" and what is "full." For example, these sizes are what I consider "curvy model" and anything of or thinner could be considered "thin." It's not an "exact science," but bare with me ...
5'8" or taller: 38-28-38" (especially 38-36-38), 135-150lbs (for 5'8"-5'9")
5'5-5'7" or so: 36-26-36" (especially 36-24-36), 125-140lbs
5'4" or shorter: 34-24-34" (especially 34-22-34), 115-130lbs (for 5'3"-5'4")
Using these numbers, Denise Milani -- for her height -- is thin (in fact, thin as fuck with that 19" mid-section) and belongs in the
Thin (not full) fucking hips thread and Kim Kardashian -- for her height -- is slightly full, and has some seriously fanging hips atop of that. Now I've already said many times that Denise's mid-section makes me cream my pants (to the point I could care less if her breasts were fake or not). But taking those 40" fangers on Kim's slender, but slightly full body -- a great "full, fucking hips" example -- I might be hard pressed not to lust for her in so many ways different than Denise.
So I'll use my new phrase ... in the rhyme of "if the shoe fits [very easily]," I'll just say, "if the cock spits [very easily]" ...
(or, better yet, "if the cock splits [those hips without a thought]")
...
Now as far as women that don't fit in [the full] thread ...
Sensual Jane
Seen here descending on the similarly well proportioned Jasmine Black.
http://hugeboobsobsession.com/resources/ddfbusty/pics/jasmineBlack/gallery.htm
Actually, both Sensual Jane and her partner Jasmine Black are 36-25-36 on a 5'6" frame. They clearly belong in the
Thin (not full) fucking hips thread. But, again, "if the cock spits" very much applies here. Jane has one hell of a flat, but wide, mid-section that is almost unreal (and God help me if she gains weight -- fuck she'd look fine!).
I think that, off the top of my head, Brittany O'Neil, Katanya Blade, Sophia Mounds and Bailey O'Dare fit this profile. Probably Ava Lauren as well?
Virtually all of these women are not "full" or are not natural and/or fit in either of these two threads ...
Thin (not full) fucking hips ...
Silicone with full, fucking hips (and no boney pelvis-tummy) ...
Again, not an "exact science" and there are some nice hips in there, but I don't want to "open the floodgates" on all the women that could possibly go into this thread and remove a lot of the "differential" that we see here.
she is awesome
what a figure
i came almost instantly when i watched her video and saw her pics
damn!
Now she is probably not fit for this thread at 34-22-36 and a taller 5'7". She is prime, Grade-A thin and of traditional supermodel form, great find, just not for here. I'll repost her in the
Thin (not full) fucking hips thread because that 22" mid-section fangs out to those 36" hips on such a thin frame that I know a lot of men who love that thread (and not so much this one) would love her.
Again, it's not an exact science, but I'm trying to tailor the threads so we don't have people complaining about "no fat chicks" in one thread and "too boney" in another thread.