The Roman or british empires were not guilty of anything eithier.![Roll eyes :rolleyes: :rolleyes:]()
Only because you disagree. Call it whatever you like.
I've presented more than merely replying "Simpleton rhetoric".
The fact remains Leftists side with Islamists. Whether you personally do is moot.
I'm pro-Taliban.
Hi. :wave2:
But I'm not a leftist, that could be our first stumbling block....
Its called "No True Scotsman" argument.
If you don't agree with me, then you must be a "librul" / "leftist"
That, is simple, that is Nicolodean view of the world.
They aren't Taliban.
The Tali predominantly wear black turbans. They(Taliban) did not exist in 1985.
Try again FK.
In that picture Ronald Reagan dedicated the space shuttle Columbia to the Afgan fighters who evolved into the Taliban and al-Qaida. Blowback a bitch.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=abkg94I_uWo
Where are these facts of which you speak?
Do you mean that "leftists" on the whole tend to question the reasons behind the attacks and/or hatred directed towards the west by this small number of radicals rather than just accepting the white hat/black hat split mentality that is seemingly more apparent in the mindset of those on the "right"? If this is indeed the case then this entire notion of "siding" with the Islamists as you put it is complete bunk. How in your estimation is it "siding" with someone to question and come to the conclusion - in looking at all the relevant information - as many have that it was the growing distaste for the west and its dealings within the middle east that was a direct cause for the growing hatred and indeed the attacks that occurred? How is criticism in and of itself siding with another group?
If this is of course not what you're implying then please, I would like you to show me the evidence that the majority of leftists have come out whether vocally or in some other form and sided with the "Islamists."
Carter and his idiot Brzezinski began the whole "Arm the Mujas" project.
Carter and Brzenzinski did indeed start it, but Reagan took it to a new level when he turned his back on Afghanistan after the Russian war. The result was the War On Terror. Blowback is Karma. :yinyang:
Reagan was out in 1988. The Afghan/Soviet war ended in 1989.
Mmmmmmm'kay???
Good. We agree on something. I think?
I forgot to add, Reagan's military programs and policies helped win the Cold War.
As did all of the president during the cold war. Reagan continued the policies and military programs started by the Truman administration. Thanks you H S Truman for winning the cold war.
I liked Truman. He had the know how to drop both A bombs on Japan and not blink an eye.
Reagan sped up our military projects to such an extent that the Soviets (already stretched thin) could not compete.
The greatest threats were from our Trident subs, Pershing II, Stealth , and the fictitious "Star Wars" program.
yawn
just another self-righteous diatribe from team neocon/zionist