The Trump Presidency

[xfire]

You're adorable when you're triggered. Incoherent, but adorable.

Calling people "triggered" is a chickenshit way of trying to silence them, and if you didn't understand what I posted that merely speaks to your level of literacy. Try harder, Pepe.

 

[himperv303]

Lets. And let's talk about FDR's military experience as it relates to WWII and Obama's during our current war on terror ... err... overseas contingencies.


Donald Trump, the candidate, disparaging John McCain as a POW was reprehensible (I don't use words like that IRL) bullshit and should've disqualified him. But in hindsight, I'm glad it didn't. Despite his drawbacks (I'm nuanced I guess), he is good and I say best for America. The last president who had "military experience" (as the left would define it - that Dan Rather tho) went one term. so spare me.

President Donald J. Trump is the commander-in-chief of our armed forces. In that, he will affect our safety more than John McCain ever has.

"President Donald J. Trump is the commander-in-chief of our armed forces."

Thats sadd... he will spend most of his time and effort sucking russian cock cause that is all he is good at.

 

[Jack Davenport]

Calling people "triggered" is a chickenshit way of trying to silence them, and if you didn't understand what I posted that merely speaks to your level of literacy. Try harder, Pepe.

"Chickenshit" and "silencing" are tactics pulled from your wheelhouse, Montezuma.

Your shit reads like something from the unibomber. I understood your post just fine. The mental gymnastics you had to perform just to draw your moral equivalency is what I like best about you when you get your ass kicked around here.

 

[Jack Davenport]

1000 dollars says Mayvag is projecting. Tell all of your FEMA camp dwelling relatives in the Pine Barrens, that help is on the way. Yeehaw!

 

[sean miguel]

Calling people "triggered" is a chickenshit way of trying to silence them, and if you didn't understand what I posted that merely speaks to your level of literacy. Try harder, Pepe.

Like threatening to get them banned. Not a chickenshit way of trying to silence them, you avenger, you. Revenge.

 

[Mayhem]

lol those russian brides tho.

and my avatar - it's from Ghost Recon Wildlands. I'm playing it on PS4 pro right now. You should check it. yee haw.

You should get BC to join your little band of fake tuff guys. Make him the character that uses a Scotch bottle as a weapon. No hostile force will withstand his wrath.:rofl2:

 

[Mayhem]

Corker says White House should stay out of tax debate; Trump fires back with insult

https://www.washingtonpost.com/powe...abb0f1e9ffb_story.html?utm_term=.9eb724f4bf71

Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), one of President Trump’s most vocal Republican critics on Capitol Hill, said Tuesday that the White House should step aside and let Congress decide the terms for tax reform, prompting Trump to insult him on Twitter.

“I would recommend that based on recent history and just interactions,” Corker said on the Today Show, when asked if Trump should “leave well enough alone” on the tax debate. “I think that’s the best way for us to have success.”

The comment came ahead of Trump’s visit to Capitol Hill Tuesday for his first visit as president to Republican senators’ weekly policy luncheon.

Trump returned fire an hour later, escalating his recent feud with Corker.

“Bob Corker, who helped President O give us the bad Iran Deal & couldn’t get elected dog catcher in Tennessee, is now fighting Tax Cuts,” the president tweeted.

“Corker dropped out of the race in Tennesse when I refused to endorse him, and now is only negative on anything Trump. Look at his record!”

Trump’s tweets mischaracterized the senator’s Iran record and the back-and-forth surrounding Corker’s decision to retire after 2018. Corker and his top aide have said Trump offered his support for the senator’s reelection and that after Corker announced he would retire, Trump called asking him to reconsider and to run again.

“Same untruths from an utterly untruthful president,” Corker tweeted Tuesday. He added the hashtag #AlertTheDaycareStaff, repeating his earlier description of Trump’s White House as an “adult daycare center.”

Many Republicans had hoped that Trump’s trip to Capitol Hill would spur progress on tax legislation, the GOP’s top legislative priority after the failure of several health-care bills. But the president’s and Corker’s comments Tuesday highlighted some of the challenges that Republicans face, including tensions between the White House and lawmakers, that stand to get in the way of that effort.

While GOP aides and senators predicted Monday that Trump’s visit would center mostly on the ongoing effort to rewrite the nation’s tax laws, the broad array of topics on their mind, coupled with the president’s penchant for suddenly veering from one subject to another, could open the door to an unpredictable afternoon.

The difficult relationship between Trump and Republican senators adds another layer of uncertainty. Trump has criticized Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) sharply for not repealing and replacing the Affordable Care Act. Republican senators have also thrown some rhetorical elbows at the president.

“I want him to tell us to do our job,” said Sen. David Perdue (R-Ga.),I never interrupt an article, but can we all take a moment to dwell on the absurd hilarity of this remark? a Trump ally who, like the president, has openly voiced his frustration that a handful of Republican senators sank the repeal-and-replace effort. He anticipated the president would argue that the tax- reform push is “bigger than tax,” in that it marked a chance for Republicans to prove they can govern, among other things.

When Trump addresses the luncheon the Republican senators attend each Tuesday afternoon in a room near the Senate chamber, “it’s important for him to convey to us the things that he thinks are priorities, and not only with respect to the tax bill, but some of the other things that we are currently working on,” said Sen. John Thune (S.D.), the third-ranking Republican senator.

One of the other things Republicans are wrestling with is health care. Trump’s decision to end federal subsidies to help offset lower-income Americans’ coverage costs led a bipartisan coalition of senators to offer a compromise bill that would authorize those funds. In exchange, states would have broader leeway in regulating coverage under the ACA.

Trump, who phoned Democratic and Republican lawmakers this month to push them to make a deal, has sent mixed signals on the plan, seeming to support it before backing away.

White House officials are urging Senate Republicans to move the bill to the right, by including provisions offering retroactive relief from the ACA’s insurance mandates for individuals and certain employers, according to people briefed on the talks.

“The White House has the ball right now,” said Sen. Lamar Alexander (Tenn.), the Republican senator who took the lead on negotiating the bipartisan package. “They’ve made some suggestions publicly about what they’d like to see in the bill. I’m for all of those things. The question is whether they can persuade Democratic senators to agree to that.”

But Alexander, who said that an analysis of his plan by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office could be released as early as Tuesday, wasn’t expecting to hear Trump sketch out his latest thinking on the framework during lunch. In his view, that would be a good thing. “I’d like for the president to focus on tax reform,” he said.

Others, however, were eager to hear Trump talk health care.

“I’d like to hear him reinforce the movement to get something done” on health care, said Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), who supports the deal Alexander reached with Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.).

Looming over the luncheon are the mutual hostilities between Trump and Republican senators. On Twitter and in remarks before television cameras, Trump has slammed McConnell and singled out other senators for attacks.

GOP senators have also landed their own blows.

McConnell, for instance, has said that Trump’s limited experience in politics created “excessive expectations” for passing landmark legislation. Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) has warned that Trump’s combative behavior has put the United States “on the path to World War III.”

But lately, both sides appear to be determined to move past their differences and project more harmony. Trump and McConnell sat down for lunch at the White House last Monday and came out for a 40-minute joint news conference afterward. They tried to play down past signs of tension as they looked ahead to their next big legislative target: tax reform.

Republicans are trying to forge ahead in their effort to usher in a sweeping rewrite of the nation’s tax laws by the end of the year. They took an initial step toward passing a tax bill last week, when the Senate passed a budget resolution allowing them to pursue the tax plan without needing any Democratic votes.

They didn’t need any Democratic votes to undo the ACA. That effort still failed because of disagreements among Republican senators. Brewing disputes over tax policy threaten to disrupt if not defeat the tax endeavor in a similar way.

Passing a bill could rest on more unpredictable GOP senators, like Susan Collins of Maine, one of three Republicans who voted against the ACA repeal bill in July.

“I’m hoping to hear more about his plans on tax reform, with more detail in it,” she said of Trump.

 

[xfire]

"Chickenshit" and "silencing" are tactics pulled from your wheelhouse, Montezuma. Your shit reads like something from the unibomber. I understood your post just fine. The mental gymnastics you had to perform just to draw your moral equivalency is what I like best about you when you get your ass kicked around here.

Yeah, the last I checked you got your ass handed to you for a month, fuck off, of course you can continue and it will happen again. I'm glad there are things you like about me, unfortunately, I don't reciprocate, but I must admit, it took a long time. I held out hope that you and your one-man posse would come around, straighten up, and start making an effort to stop being douchebags, but I no longer have any such expectation and would just as soon see the two of you spontaneously burst into flames. And no, you don't understand shit, you're in over your head and too bad for you, and I'm past the point of trying to get along. Everything I posted above is 100% spot on, that's why you utilized 100% of your brain power to resort to personal attacks instead of disputing what I posted. And thanks for comparing me to Ted Kaczynski, and while I don't possess a Ph.D in Mathematics, it's certainly not an insult to be compared to such an intellect. You, on the other hand, would be more appropriately described as the FreeOnes verson of Ed Gein. Here's a protip for you and your vast army of one follower; Don't respond to my posts. But, if you can't control your emotions enough to refrain from responding to my posts; Address whatever issue is being discussed and keep the personal attacks out of it. For myself, I'm more than happy to ignore you and anyone connected to you.

 

[sean miguel]

Holy shit, that Ted Kaczynski comparison was apt.

I mean just based on intellect.

 

[Bloodshot Scott]

The discourse definitely seems more brutal nowadays, but people here have to remember, this country has a rich history of brutal, gutter trash political discourse.

When it comes to negative campaign advertising and rhetoric, today’s candidates aren't even in the same league as our own Founding Founders—and the many presidential contenders who have followed—when it comes to playing rough in the game of electoral politics.

...

President John Adams and Vice-President Thomas Jefferson—the two highest elected officials in the land and each a pivotal player in the creation of our nation—squared off in a race for the White House and established a tradition of negative campaigning that would cause our current candidates to blush with embarrassment.

...


Callender wrote that Adams was a rageful, lying, warmongering fellow; a "repulsive pedant" and "gross hypocrite" who “behaved neither like a man nor like a woman but instead possessed a hideous hermaphroditical character."

https://www.forbes.com/sites/rickun...al-campaign-ever-not-even-close/#230129873d84


So, I mean, it is what it is. This country has that history, and Trump (I don't think) even comes close to some of the trash being thrown in the history of this nation's politics.

 

[Jack Davenport]

Yeah, the last I checked you got your ass handed to you for a month, fuck off, of course you can continue and it will happen again. I'm glad there are things you like about me, unfortunately, I don't reciprocate, but I must admit, it took a long time. I held out hope that you and your one-man posse would come around, straighten up, and start making an effort to stop being douchebags, but I no longer have any such expectation and would just as soon see the two of you spontaneously burst into flames. And no, you don't understand shit, you're in over your head and too bad for you, and I'm past the point of trying to get along. Everything I posted above is 100% spot on, that's why you utilized 100% of your brain power to resort to personal attacks instead of disputing what I posted. And thanks for comparing me to Ted Kaczynski, and while I don't possess a Ph.D in Mathematics, it's certainly not an insult to be compared to such an intellect. You, on the other hand, would be more appropriately described as the FreeOnes verson of Ed Gein. Here's a protip for you and your vast army of one follower; Don't respond to my posts. But, if you can't control your emotions enough to refrain from responding to my posts; Address whatever issue is being discussed and keep the personal attacks out of it. For myself, I'm more than happy to ignore you and anyone connected to you.

Ah yes, the reminder of a ban on a porn board arises again. That must be in the pantheon of your greatest achievements, right up there with stove top pan baked chocolate chip cookies and fucking fat girls, they dovetail nicely.

I'll respond if I feel like it and if I don't, I won't.
It's not like you are offering any great pearls of wisdom around here anyway.

The only thing that puts you in the same category as Kaczynski is your incoherent ramblings that happen when you get embarrassed which is quite often. The traits you display around here would be more like a Ted Bundy ( since we are comparing to serial killers now) a revenge seeking psychopath. This so called intellect that you boast about seems to manifest itself in the form of a petulant child with an inferiority complex.

It's an inside joke around here and it crosses political lines.

 

[sean miguel]

nuked.

 

[ApolloBalboa]

The discourse definitely seems more brutal nowadays, but people here have to remember, this country has a rich history of brutal, gutter trash political discourse.





https://www.forbes.com/sites/rickun...al-campaign-ever-not-even-close/#230129873d84


So, I mean, it is what it is. This country has that history, and Trump (I don't think) even comes close to some of the trash being thrown in the history of this nation's politics.

I wouldn't mind seeing some of that language being tossed around in today's politics. It's definitely more colorful.

 

[himperv303]

Let us talk about Trumps Military experience.

During Vietnam he said he chickened out of joining the military because he had grown an vagina.

During his election campaign he said he knew more than most Generals did.

Now he says, ” I always felt that I was in the military” just because he has banged Russian hookers.
.
.
.
Hey, banging Russian hookers is not is not the same as serving the military.

More

 

[xfire]

It's an inside joke around here and it crosses political lines.

What goes on between you, af, and the "For The Curious" section of the forum isn't any of my business.

 

[Bloodshot Scott]

I wouldn't mind seeing some of that language being tossed around in today's politics. It's definitely more colorful.

With the politically correct poisoning of this country by SJW/cultural marxist cretins, that sort of language would get you thrown in jail today.

 

[ApolloBalboa]

With the politically correct poisoning of this country by SJW/cultural marxist cretins, that sort of language would get you thrown in jail today.

I'm not going to comment on how you perceive SJWs or their ilk to be the downfall of the country, but if you can say all of George Carlin's "Seven words you can never say on television" on television* and no one throws a fit, no one should get hysterical over that sort of language.

*On premium cable anyway

 

[Rattrap]

Ugh. It's always a shame when the tide brings the sewage back.

Sorry to intrude on the lib group therapy thread however.

Is this the self-defense mechanism you're going with these days when finding your shitty perspective in the minority?

A clever person would get a better perspective. But there's always the less clever option of sticking with shit and pretending it's everyone else who is covered in brown.

Relevancy, on a politics sub-forum of a porn board. I guess that's important to some people, and if so, I don't fault you or others for it. Like you said, everyone wants a place where people know their name. Or just someone, anyone.

Ah yes, the reminder of a ban on a porn board arises again. That must be in the pantheon of your greatest achievements, right up there with stove top pan baked chocolate chip cookies and fucking fat girls, they dovetail nicely.

Pro-tip: If you want to be less transparent about your borderline need for this forum, you might want to make it less obvious that you can not wait to get back here post-ban.

I tried liking the left (being one of their own in my stupid younger years) and assuming the best intentions. But they are either hopelessly naive or fucking evil. And judging by the end results, does it really matter?

#fucktheleft

Evil, says the guy who is okay with rape.

Every day is another chance to make the world a better place via suicide, animus.

Despite his drawbacks (I'm nuanced I guess), he is good and I say best for America.

I remain impressed at your ability to believe things that are abjectly false.

Given the wealth of information at your fingertips, it must take significant effort to maintain such absurd beliefs. Then again, given recent insight into your character, maybe it isn't stupidity but actual evil. See reply to last quote.

You're adorable when you're triggered.

Aww BC, you've got him beat by half!

I wouldn't mind seeing some of that language being tossed around in today's politics. It's definitely more colorful.

You'd have to get rid of Jeff Sessions first.

Moving on, these Republican retirements are interesting: http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/24/politics/jeff-flake-retirement-arizona/index.html

I haven't invested any time looking into them individually, but I suspect because they are not fans of Trump, they must be RINOs, as are everybody left of Mussolini, from what I often hear from conservative internet warriors (PS - Trump is left of Mussolini).

And BsS, just do you don't forget:

Now many of these people are now great Americans to the same "I'm leaving if they're elected" talkers.

This sounds an awful lot like a narrative you've been given and you're running with it uncritically.

Here's an opportunity to buck that impression: Please, provide some examples of the "I'm leaving if they're elected" talkers now praising Bush, McCain, or Romney. As in specific individuals/groups who start from position A and move to position B, as opposed to some nebulous group of liberals who were at position A and some other, unconnected nebulous group of liberals who are at position B.

 

[Jack Davenport]

What goes on between you, af, and the "For The Curious" section of the forum isn't any of my business.

Not my bag baby. But you seem to be familiar with it. Keep slaying you slut!

 

[Jack Davenport]

Is this the self-defense mechanism you're going with these days when finding your shitty perspective in the minority?

A clever person would get a better perspective.



Pro-tip: If you want to be less transparent about your borderline need for this forum, you might want to make it less obvious that you can not wait to get back here post ban

Opinion polls do not a minority make. The last few polls that meant anything were at the ballot box and my side won.

I didn't jump right back onto the board after my ban was lifted, I think I waited about a week and I have posted sparingly for the past month. So I guess the " perspective" that is the correct one comes from your " perspective" :1orglaugh

It's always a chuckle to be reminded that I live rent free in your head.