jasonk282
Banned
It is Creation, no "ism" needed and "intelligent design" is a lie.
only in your case Will E.
It is Creation, no "ism" needed and "intelligent design" is a lie.
I like liberals. They're cute and cuddly, and they really love the kids! I'm thinking of getting another liberal puppy--probably a golden or a chocolate lib. My neighbor Edna raises liberals. She's been doing it ever since her husband Yeller passed away. Of course, they're easier to clean up after than those conservatives...they're not Housebroken.
only in your case Will E.
In your case. :tongue:
The problem with "intelligent design" is, what "intelligence" created the universe?
With Creation you know who did.
is that they elect blowjobbers and liars under oath like clinton
Both theistic philosophers and theologians have typically been happy to use the word omniscient (as in "all-knowing") to describe God. He/she/it is maximally intelligent, the epitome of intelligence. I don't know why a Christian (or any theist) would object to that term (especially considering that the vast majority (if not nearly all) of promoters of "intelligent design" are monotheists, and usually Christians).
Can you dig that?
is that they elect blowjobbers and liars under oath like clinton
Christians just call it Creation. Can you dig it? OOOH YEAH!![]()
It's the same thing you twit.
intelligent design is nothing but creationism with a fancy name and has no place in any rational scientific discussion ... for a good overview of the subject, read "The Devil in Dover" by Lauri Lebo
intelligent design is nothing but creationism with a fancy name and has no place in any rational scientific discussion ... for a good overview of the subject, read "The Devil in Dover" by Lauri Lebo
No, to you both.
I don't care what Wikipedia has to say. They are incorrect on this subject.
What is the difference between The Bible and Wikipedia?
What is the difference between The Bible and Wikipedia?
What is the difference between The Bible and Wikipedia?