A tangent (created by myself) from:
http://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?p=743189
If God created the penis to merely be engulfed all-around by the female vagina, with near-equal stimulation all around, then why this design? Or from a pure Darwin aspect, if all men did was have their penis' engulfed by the vagina, wouldn't those men with sensitivity more equally spread all around be the natural selection over the eons?
The reality is that the male penis is designed for extensive ventral stimulation -- whether it be of God's design or Darwin natural selection. It's not only pleasureable for men to engage in extensive foreplay outside the vagina by rubbing the ventral their penis all over every aspect of the female anatomy (like with a giving lover such as Michelle), but it is the will of God and/or Darwinism.
Going a step further, many have heard me state that God is feminine. It was God Herself who created man. I have different theories why, but one of is because She wanted someone to caress her body. So She created an additional appendage for this slave, and made it pleasurable for him so he continued to do it -- all while giving him "free will" so he would choose to do it.
Unfortunately, mere mortal and lesser man could not handle perfect God Herself. He kept going into cardiac arrest. So She created woman, in Her own image, but with variety and various imperfections -- a creature She could relate and enjoy Herself through. Men vary on what types of women approach "Heavenly" in their eyes -- but it's because all women are subsets of God's perfection. We honestly are "too dumb" to comprehend the "perfect woman" -- much less sustain stimulation with God Herself. Hence the continued debate.
As much as God tried, She could not get man to stop loving the entirety of the female curve. Now matter what imperfections, man still loved woman in her entirety. Every part of her was a representation of God Herself. He merely didn't caress with his penis, he engulfed woman's entire form as he stimulated himself.
At some point -- maybe earlier than later -- She recognized the need for procreation. It was obvious that woman would need to be the bearer of creation, and taking the man's obsession with the entire female curve, She gave woman a crevase man could enter while still being intertwined with her. She modified the penis to include a very sensitive helmet dorsal, so the act of penetration -- and repeat entry/exit -- would be stimulating to him as much as her crevase was. She was given a similar, but minimally protruding appendage in clitoris.
This addition of the crevase and hollowed shaft caused changes to the woman's curvature. She added a counter, jutting bust to woman's torso to match the protrusion of her rear -- while still leaving a split between the bust with their own nipples so two off-spring (either sequential or the rare set of twins) could be feed. The increase in the curvature and visual and, correspondingly, physical stimulation -- especially the additional of a higher fat precentage resulting in softer, more pleasurable skin for the ventral male penis -- caused man to want to be intertwined with women more, furthering the desire for procreation.
Darwanism and mankind's history has done the rest.
Although the extremely sensitive head was designed for pleasure for inserting and stimulating her entry and clitoris, most men focus on length and penetration. Men who stop and realize that minimal penetration depth is more intense -- stimulating both the ventral of his helmet and her entry-way and G-spot can be a more pleasurable means of intercourse. God Herself further created pubic hair to soften the experience for man, as well as trap semen and allow it to enter the vagina for procreation.
Furthermore, the penis helmet is still most sensitive on the ventral to match her clitoris, and extreme, non-intercourse pleasure can be derived from a male who places his helmet on her clitoris. While the two are engaged, the stem and lower dorsal of penis still parts the vagina's lips, adding to the pleasure.
It could also be argued that the scrotum is external not because semen cannot survive being inside of the 98.6F degree body, but God Herself designed the scrotum as an additional, swaying and loose stimulation -- and she made it so semen couldn't survive inside the body so Darwanism wouldn't eventually make the scrotum extinct. The swaying and flapping of the scrotum is an additional stimulation in the helmet-clitoris engagement, as well as during intercourse -- and, furthermore, possibly why women like their butts to be spanked.
The split of the breasts into two sets of sacks and nipples, as well as split rear for the anus, also became instant components of stimulation for the largely ventral sensitive penis. Especially the bust, which has the softest skin free of anything but milk sacks and supportive/protective fat. I don't think this was unintentional by God Herself, although it probably wasn't Her first consideration -- but a nice "side effect" in the worship of woman by man. Especially since She knew the protruding rear and countering, jutting bust would be a major focus of man.
Another, possibly intended by God Herself, benefit of man is option of oral stimulation. With the sensitive dorsal side of the helmet, it is ideal for partial insertion into the woman's mouth, and the area ideally placed for direct stimulation of the tongue. One might argue the protein amino acid design combined with the early emphasis on Fruitcose (fruit) in religious texts meant to suggest that this "additional pleasure" was by God Herself's own design -- for not just the man, but the woman as well by recommending the male sweeten his semen with fruit for her pleasure in consumption.
Now while people argue whether or not God Herself intented this, I can tell you that God Herself was full aware of it! Proof? Two reasons: one, saliva is a spermicide, and two, the female oral cavity is not ideally suited for full penetration. God Herself knew that oral stimulation might make an attractive alternative for men, and might inhibit intercourse and, therefore, procreation. So she made sure that, with siliva as a spermicide, Darwinism would favore those who did not heavily practice oral sex. And with the smaller cavity, she kept man non-dominating and focused on inter-twined and mutual love making.
I still think God intended woman-on-man oral sex. Unfortunately, I don't think woman today like it as much as God Herself designed. Why? Because of Darwinism, those women who loved it the most did not procreate as much. As such, while I consider oral woman-on-man sex very natural, it is often not practice well by men. The key continues to be limited penetration and lots of fruitcose consumption for her enjoyment.
Now going the other way, man-on-woman oral sex, nothing has changed. The female clitoris is ideally designed for male, oral application. One might even argue the tongue, which did not need to be extended from the mouth, was explicitly extended from the mouth by God Herself for this very reason -- male-on-female oral sex! Especially with the issues with an extending tongue (accidental swallow, blockage of airways, including the nose-to-mouth pathways, etc...). Darwinism then took over from there, with the woman most procreating being those who have male lovers that ensure their complete stimulation and foreplay.
In any case, I believe -- both by devine, feminine creation/planning/intervention (especially in how we differ from sexual practices from other animals, even mammals) and how Darwinism has played out (largely how God Herself intented, with a few unintentional effects) -- the male penis was heavily designed for non-intercourse.
And I have to believe that women are, as Michelle said it best, "cock dominators" -- starting with God Herself from the epoch.
http://board.freeones.com/showthread.php?p=743189
One thing I like to regularly point out to the "religious right" that believe intercourse is the "only way" is that the male penis is most sensitive on the ventral side. Furthermore, select portions of the ventral, like near the helmet, are extremely sensitive.michelle_lopez said:
If God created the penis to merely be engulfed all-around by the female vagina, with near-equal stimulation all around, then why this design? Or from a pure Darwin aspect, if all men did was have their penis' engulfed by the vagina, wouldn't those men with sensitivity more equally spread all around be the natural selection over the eons?
The reality is that the male penis is designed for extensive ventral stimulation -- whether it be of God's design or Darwin natural selection. It's not only pleasureable for men to engage in extensive foreplay outside the vagina by rubbing the ventral their penis all over every aspect of the female anatomy (like with a giving lover such as Michelle), but it is the will of God and/or Darwinism.
Going a step further, many have heard me state that God is feminine. It was God Herself who created man. I have different theories why, but one of is because She wanted someone to caress her body. So She created an additional appendage for this slave, and made it pleasurable for him so he continued to do it -- all while giving him "free will" so he would choose to do it.
Unfortunately, mere mortal and lesser man could not handle perfect God Herself. He kept going into cardiac arrest. So She created woman, in Her own image, but with variety and various imperfections -- a creature She could relate and enjoy Herself through. Men vary on what types of women approach "Heavenly" in their eyes -- but it's because all women are subsets of God's perfection. We honestly are "too dumb" to comprehend the "perfect woman" -- much less sustain stimulation with God Herself. Hence the continued debate.
As much as God tried, She could not get man to stop loving the entirety of the female curve. Now matter what imperfections, man still loved woman in her entirety. Every part of her was a representation of God Herself. He merely didn't caress with his penis, he engulfed woman's entire form as he stimulated himself.
At some point -- maybe earlier than later -- She recognized the need for procreation. It was obvious that woman would need to be the bearer of creation, and taking the man's obsession with the entire female curve, She gave woman a crevase man could enter while still being intertwined with her. She modified the penis to include a very sensitive helmet dorsal, so the act of penetration -- and repeat entry/exit -- would be stimulating to him as much as her crevase was. She was given a similar, but minimally protruding appendage in clitoris.
This addition of the crevase and hollowed shaft caused changes to the woman's curvature. She added a counter, jutting bust to woman's torso to match the protrusion of her rear -- while still leaving a split between the bust with their own nipples so two off-spring (either sequential or the rare set of twins) could be feed. The increase in the curvature and visual and, correspondingly, physical stimulation -- especially the additional of a higher fat precentage resulting in softer, more pleasurable skin for the ventral male penis -- caused man to want to be intertwined with women more, furthering the desire for procreation.
Darwanism and mankind's history has done the rest.
Although the extremely sensitive head was designed for pleasure for inserting and stimulating her entry and clitoris, most men focus on length and penetration. Men who stop and realize that minimal penetration depth is more intense -- stimulating both the ventral of his helmet and her entry-way and G-spot can be a more pleasurable means of intercourse. God Herself further created pubic hair to soften the experience for man, as well as trap semen and allow it to enter the vagina for procreation.
Furthermore, the penis helmet is still most sensitive on the ventral to match her clitoris, and extreme, non-intercourse pleasure can be derived from a male who places his helmet on her clitoris. While the two are engaged, the stem and lower dorsal of penis still parts the vagina's lips, adding to the pleasure.
It could also be argued that the scrotum is external not because semen cannot survive being inside of the 98.6F degree body, but God Herself designed the scrotum as an additional, swaying and loose stimulation -- and she made it so semen couldn't survive inside the body so Darwanism wouldn't eventually make the scrotum extinct. The swaying and flapping of the scrotum is an additional stimulation in the helmet-clitoris engagement, as well as during intercourse -- and, furthermore, possibly why women like their butts to be spanked.
The split of the breasts into two sets of sacks and nipples, as well as split rear for the anus, also became instant components of stimulation for the largely ventral sensitive penis. Especially the bust, which has the softest skin free of anything but milk sacks and supportive/protective fat. I don't think this was unintentional by God Herself, although it probably wasn't Her first consideration -- but a nice "side effect" in the worship of woman by man. Especially since She knew the protruding rear and countering, jutting bust would be a major focus of man.
Another, possibly intended by God Herself, benefit of man is option of oral stimulation. With the sensitive dorsal side of the helmet, it is ideal for partial insertion into the woman's mouth, and the area ideally placed for direct stimulation of the tongue. One might argue the protein amino acid design combined with the early emphasis on Fruitcose (fruit) in religious texts meant to suggest that this "additional pleasure" was by God Herself's own design -- for not just the man, but the woman as well by recommending the male sweeten his semen with fruit for her pleasure in consumption.
Now while people argue whether or not God Herself intented this, I can tell you that God Herself was full aware of it! Proof? Two reasons: one, saliva is a spermicide, and two, the female oral cavity is not ideally suited for full penetration. God Herself knew that oral stimulation might make an attractive alternative for men, and might inhibit intercourse and, therefore, procreation. So she made sure that, with siliva as a spermicide, Darwinism would favore those who did not heavily practice oral sex. And with the smaller cavity, she kept man non-dominating and focused on inter-twined and mutual love making.
I still think God intended woman-on-man oral sex. Unfortunately, I don't think woman today like it as much as God Herself designed. Why? Because of Darwinism, those women who loved it the most did not procreate as much. As such, while I consider oral woman-on-man sex very natural, it is often not practice well by men. The key continues to be limited penetration and lots of fruitcose consumption for her enjoyment.
Now going the other way, man-on-woman oral sex, nothing has changed. The female clitoris is ideally designed for male, oral application. One might even argue the tongue, which did not need to be extended from the mouth, was explicitly extended from the mouth by God Herself for this very reason -- male-on-female oral sex! Especially with the issues with an extending tongue (accidental swallow, blockage of airways, including the nose-to-mouth pathways, etc...). Darwinism then took over from there, with the woman most procreating being those who have male lovers that ensure their complete stimulation and foreplay.
In any case, I believe -- both by devine, feminine creation/planning/intervention (especially in how we differ from sexual practices from other animals, even mammals) and how Darwinism has played out (largely how God Herself intented, with a few unintentional effects) -- the male penis was heavily designed for non-intercourse.
And I have to believe that women are, as Michelle said it best, "cock dominators" -- starting with God Herself from the epoch.
Last edited:
