And W.'s interests were any different? Honestly?
That's why I can't stand the left or right in the US, they say one thing and then accuse the other of the saying the same.
The I Told You So Obama Will Fuck Up Thread
- Thread starter don_equis
- Start date
-
- Tags
- barack obama sore losers
That's why I can't stand the left or right in the US, they say one thing and then accuse the other of the saying the same.
Since when is Jesse Jackson the spokesperson for all minorities? As Token from South Park says, "Jesse Jackson is not the king of black people". A statement like what you said is just plain bullshit and makes no sense. Racism doesn't have anything to do with power or oppression. Granted, racist people can and typically do oppress the group they are racist towards, but that's not the key point of racism. Racism is defined as a feeling of hatred towards another group or groups or a feeling that your ethnic group is superior towards another ethnic group. Any idiot with half a brain could tell you that. Anyone can feel hatred towards another race. Just because they can't enslave them or implement Jim Crow laws on them doesn't mean it's officially not racism. Stop worshipping Jesse Jackson and think for yourself for once.
As for your second paragraph, I don't know if you noticed but the president governs his entire country, not just his own backyard. If Obama screws up, it effects the entire country, not just himself. Granted the entire country will hate him, but do you even know why? It's because they'd be feeling the effects of his screw up. To say that Obama's screw ups would only affect himself is completely ignorant and shows you no absolutely nothing about how anything works in this world. Upon coming to this realization, I think you should probably stop trying to talk politics because you're just making a fool of yourself.
Bush had the ENTIRE flippin world behind his sorry ass after 9/11. As such he was extended benefits of every doubt and the normal rules of accountability were ignored.
As it turns he merely exploited that in order pursue an agenda hatched by neocons when he was somewhere in Houston hanging off the end of a Jim Beam bottle.
I rest my case. Honestly.
Philbert
Banned
So it's not un-obvious, then?
As far as Obama succeeding, Obama wants to end the war against Muslim extremists; protect Americans from themselves; create jobs for American Unions; and make healthcare more Government-controlled and corrupted, among other things.
"You "hope" he fails at that?? "
YES! YES! YES! I DO!
So, we'll see it how it goes...
either the Deists are right, there is a God and he causes Obama and his posse to fail, ultimately, at his "change America" agenda. And the country survives...:thumbsup:
Or...there is no God, his success would prove that nothing really matters; and Hell would be right here, right now, on this Earth; but not so much fun like the jokes sometimes suggest.:eek:
I guess we'll see...:dunno:
Oops, forgot to post this "interesting" headline earlier.
http://www.reuters.com/article/Obam...edName=ObamaEconomy&virtualBrandChannel=10441
Now about, again, Obama succeeding or failing. His policies are wrong. If he succeeds in implementing them we're screwed. If he's stopped, then we'll be a bit better off. Of course, I want the best for everyone, and I'm sure people on his side also want the best for everyone, we just differ in the way to get there. I'm all for proven methods, more free market policies, less intrusive government, fair taxes in a way that hard working people can keep the vast majority of what they earn, and of course, drill, baby, drill.
http://www.reuters.com/article/Obam...edName=ObamaEconomy&virtualBrandChannel=10441
Now about, again, Obama succeeding or failing. His policies are wrong. If he succeeds in implementing them we're screwed. If he's stopped, then we'll be a bit better off. Of course, I want the best for everyone, and I'm sure people on his side also want the best for everyone, we just differ in the way to get there. I'm all for proven methods, more free market policies, less intrusive government, fair taxes in a way that hard working people can keep the vast majority of what they earn, and of course, drill, baby, drill
.Oops, forgot to post this "interesting" headline earlier.
http://www.reuters.com/article/Obam...edName=ObamaEconomy&virtualBrandChannel=10441
Now about, again, Obama succeeding or failing. His policies are wrong. If he succeeds in implementing them we're screwed. If he's stopped, then we'll be a bit better off. Of course, I want the best for everyone, and I'm sure people on his side also want the best for everyone, we just differ in the way to get there. I'm all for proven methods, more free market policies, less intrusive government, fair taxes in a way that hard working people can keep the vast majority of what they earn, and of course, drill, baby, drill
Well there were obviously those who believed (possibly even you) GOPer policies would be better for the country. They had all three branches of government for 6 years and at the end of it the country was up on the fucking rocks.
You can't sit down for a second and let someone else try their hand at fixing it??
Oops, forgot to post this "interesting" headline earlier.
http://www.reuters.com/article/Obam...edName=ObamaEconomy&virtualBrandChannel=10441
Now about, again, Obama succeeding or failing. His policies are wrong. If he succeeds in implementing them we're screwed. If he's stopped, then we'll be a bit better off. Of course, I want the best for everyone, and I'm sure people on his side also want the best for everyone, we just differ in the way to get there. I'm all for proven methods, more free market policies, less intrusive government, fair taxes in a way that hard working people can keep the vast majority of what they earn, and of course, drill, baby, drill
You don't seem to understand what I'm saying here. I'm not talking about his policies and whether they're good or not. I'm not talking about whether you wanted him to win. The fact of the matter is plain and simple. If you want the president to fail, you pretty much want the country to fail. There's no way you can "want the best for everyone" and come back around to say shit like you want the president to fail just because you didn't like the outcome of the election.
ding-ding-ding-ding-ding!! We have a winner!
Sounds more like my hot pocket's done, if you ask me.
Curious was there ever a post "Will Bush Fail"?
Having a majority & having the majority that the Dems have now are 2 completely different things. Also, The Republicans did not force through a different agenda every week, especially without reading what the hell they were trying to pass. The Dems are not even sure what they are doing in the Senate and Congress right now b/c their beloved Messiah is attempting/forcing to pass so much legislation in such a short amount of time, and not allowing anyone time to actually study up on the bill (or the Senators or Congressmen not bothering to read it). If the supporters of these bills actually bothered to read/study them, most of the bills would not come close to passing.
Well crisis situations are not always conducive to drawn out deliberation. That's why you hire people who you believe have the judgment to come to appropriate, practical solutions in a short period of time.
I'm pretty sure there've been people skeptical of every president's performance ever since the first election was held. That's usually why people vote for the other party.
Young students, the poor, the teachers, ghetto people, alot of people who have families in the south american countries voted for him to win, so it is not everyone who wanted Obama to win but mostly the poor and the not so fiscally advantaged social classes. When you grew up in a poor hood, you will vote for someone who has lived in the hood or who has lived in the hood while being tight on money. Are the students, the poor, the teachers, ghetto people, alot of people who have families in the south american countries voted for him to win representing the whole population of the USA??? Not as far as I know. What may be good for them may not be good for the others. His program was mostly based on a marketing image and the so called change isn't a change but just making things worse than they were. Trying to implement social security and assisting people socially is completely unamerican, you must be a bloody socialist to want that. Socialism has no place in USA and the OBAMA administration needs to get a massive ass kicking.
And we see how that worked out with the bail-out bill that allowed companies to pay execs absurd amounts of bonuses. And then Congress got their panties in a wad and raised hell after they were paid. But then it was found out that it was written onto the bill that execs could be paid their bonuses form that money. I guess it does pay to not read the bill that's up for legislation. Ignorance is bliss I presume?
And there is no form of crisis that can allow for this type of legislation. Especially not with the way the current admin is handling the economy.
naming idiots like Pelosi, Rahm and Clinton is typical of the Obama administration. They are all a bunch of idiotic cunts.
Pelosi is not a part of Obama's administration....but don't ever let the facts get in the way of a good lie.
Wasn't the bailout package written during the Bushie Era?
