The Difference Between Them And Us (Disturbing)

SabrinaDeep

Official Checked Star Member
We always kill the terrorists, they always capture alive and film the killing (it's irrelevant if the killing is staged or real, before someone tells me that there is no blood in the video).

http://www.ilgiornale.it/news/mondo...lisis-bimbo-spara-due-spie-russe-1082459.html

Maybe it's time to get some of those pieces of shit alive too, beat them up a little bit and drug them to extort a confession on video and have them to admit that they are apostates of our values, that they were Christians or Jewish before and that Capitalism and freedom are great; then we could have a couple of women (let's leave kids to do what they do best: being kids) pissing all over them and we could lock them in a pretty comfortable house and feed them with a large 3 courses pork meal, twice a day, why not, served by a couple of hotties in a bikini. Everything filmed and broadcasted like in a sort of Master Chef for Jidahists TV program. The public could vote from home and eliminate one contestant each month to be sent to Guantanamo or to Siberia, while the winner could earn the right to blow himself up in a room crowded with his fellow contestants, or, if declined, to spend the rest of his life making FIFA footballs for 3$ a day pay. Then we and the rest of the world would see what's the real size of these people's nuts.
It's really really wrong and counterproductive to kill them on the spot. Like a famous Brit once said: education, education, education!
 
I am really enjoying your insight lately.

OCSMOTW nom coming right up.
 
Maybe it's time to get some of those pieces of shit alive too, beat them up a little bit and drug them to extort a confession on video and have them to admit that they are apostates of our values, that they were Christians or Jewish before and that Capitalism and freedom are great;

Terrorist are always ready to betray their friends.

Their motives are easy money and the fact that they can kill and torture without being caught.
 

Mayhem

Banned
So when you call this thread "The Difference Between Them And Us", you're saying you don't want there to be a difference between them and us.

Capture.JPGCapture1.JPGCapture2.JPG
 

SabrinaDeep

Official Checked Star Member
So when you call this thread "The Difference Between Them And Us", you're saying you don't want there to be a difference between them and us.

View attachment 409872View attachment 409873View attachment 409874

So, you really believe that you have understood my post and that we are talking about the same thing? Because if it's so, try again. This is a thread about apples; for one about pears there is the NEW THREAD button.
Although i despise those actions depicted in the images you posted, they have nothing to do with the object of this thread. And i mean not even close to something.
Americans too do bad, despicable things to people, including to alleged bad ones and they sometimes get caught? Doh! Thank you for enlightening me. Now put an effort and try to understand the object of this thread, as it has nothing to do with who does bad things to whom, but with war propaganda which uses professionally produced media to ridicule and terrorize the enemy, among other things.
 

Mayhem

Banned
So, you really believe that you have understood my post and that we are talking about the same thing? Because if it's so, try again. This is a thread about apples; for one about pears there is the NEW THREAD button.
Although i despise those actions depicted in the images you posted, they have nothing to do with the object of this thread. And i mean not even close to something.
Americans too do bad, despicable things to people, including to alleged bad ones and they sometimes get caught? Doh! Thank you for enlightening me. Now put an effort and try to understand the object of this thread, as it has nothing to do with who does bad things to whom, but with war propaganda which uses professionally produced media to ridicule and terrorize the enemy, among other things.

Well snookums, the obligation of clarity falls upon the writer, not the reader. Something you still fail to grasp because in this latest prose, five lines are devoted to snotty, sarcastic and petulant; and one line is devoted to what the hell you're bent out of shape about this time.

What you are talking about is Psychological Warfare and Propoganda. It's been around since the printing press was invented and reached its heyday in World War II.

Capture3.JPGCapture.JPGCapture2.JPG

There were also radio shows such as T okyo Rose and Lord Haw-Haw. Leaflets were dropped by air and artillery telling the opposition what pointless war they were fighting. All this continued through Korea and Vietnam.

Now, I'll agree with you in that I've always felt that continuous mass drops of Hustler and Penthouse onto Taliban positions might be a hoot. And while it doesn't fall under the strict guise of Propoganda, littering the place with nicely rolled, killer bud would probably help the war effort immensly.

But that's not what you're talking about, is it?

The public could vote from home and eliminate one contestant each month to be sent to Guantanamo or to Siberia, while the winner could earn the right to blow himself up in a room crowded with his fellow contestants

Hell, why not just bring back the Roman Colisseum (properly known as the Flavian Amphitheatre)? Get lions and grizzley bears into the act. Make former comrades off each other with short swords for the hopeful promise of a N.Y. cab drivers job. Make Sean Hannity the MC and you're all set.

Again, you want to be like them. I don't. You want revenge. I want closure. You want to hurt people. I want them to leave us alone. You think reflecting pain, misery, despair and death upon them will make you feel better. It won't. It'll make you feel worse. And it will just make more and more of them sign up to fight us. And we can both keep doing these things to each other until there's no one left.

Feel better yet?
 

SabrinaDeep

Official Checked Star Member
I'll pass on the clarity which falls upon the writer thingy...

The last time someone was passive in the hope to be left alone, French (ironically enough) got invaded by the nazis and not a single bullet was shot. At war you fight and this is a war, you like it or not. These people won't leave us alone until they have submitted us to the sharia or until they get badly burned trying to do that. I reckon that you leave in the US and that you have no idea of what's happening over here, in Europe, on a daily basis. But rest assured, that if this shit doesn't get stopped, you'll realize sooner than later how far from reality you are. Let's talk again in 3 or 4 years, if we'll still be allowed to do so freely.

Again, you want to be like them. I don't.
It looks exactly like the other way around. If you don't want to be like something or someone attacking you, you fight it/them.
 
I reckon that you leave in the US and that you have no idea of what's happening over here, in Europe, on a daily basis. But rest assured, that if this shit doesn't get stopped, you'll realize sooner than later how far from reality you are. Let's talk again in 3 or 4 years, if we'll still be allowed to do so freely.


I think that in Europe politicians want to offer asylum to refugees, but people want to get rid of them.
 

Mayhem

Banned
I'll pass on the clarity which falls upon the writer thingy...

The last time someone was passive in the hope to be left alone, French (ironically enough) got invaded by the nazis and not a single bullet was shot. At war you fight and this is a war, you like it or not. These people won't leave us alone until they have submitted us to the sharia or until they get badly burned trying to do that. I reckon that you leave in the US and that you have no idea of what's happening over here, in Europe, on a daily basis. But rest assured, that if this shit doesn't get stopped, you'll realize sooner than later how far from reality you are. Let's talk again in 3 or 4 years, if we'll still be allowed to do so freely.

Again, you want to be like them. I don't.
It looks exactly like the other way around. If you don't want to be like something or someone attacking you, you fight it/them.

I know about war and fighting in them. Much better than you. This thread isn't about fighting war. It's about being mean to people that are being mean to you. It's about retribution for retribution's sake. You want the US to post internet videos that show that we can torment unarmed, defenseless people just as good as they can. That's not war. And that's not attacking an enemy. That's merely being a bully. And being so falls right into their hands. It wouldn't be a deterrent, it would be an incentive. 3 or 4 years? Try 30 or 40. What you're proposing wouldn't change anything, except they'd be more inclined to keep fighting us than they already are.

You also have a severe problem with your facts:
French (ironically enough) got invaded by the nazis and not a single bullet was shot.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_France
 

SabrinaDeep

Official Checked Star Member
The French army fought against the Nazis...

Assari Assari....Petain refused to party with the Brits to resist the Nazis and signed the armistice with the Nazis handing France to Hitler and becoming prime minister of the puppet French government. Later, at the end of the war, he was tried and convicted for treason.
 
Assari Assari....Petain refused to party with the Brits to resist the Nazis and signed the armistice with the Nazis handing France to Hitler and becoming prime minister of the puppet French government. Later, at the end of the war, he was tried and convicted for treason.

Can you blame him for remembering it differently?? I mean how can you live with that kind of shame as a people.
 
Assari Assari....Petain refused to party with the Brits to resist the Nazis and signed the armistice with the Nazis handing France to Hitler and becoming prime minister of the puppet French government. Later, at the end of the war, he was tried and convicted for treason.


That's true, some of the French were very cooperative with the Nazis between 1940-1944.

It is also a fact that over 80 000 French soldier were killed during the battle of France in summer 1940.
 

SabrinaDeep

Official Checked Star Member
That's true, some of the French were very cooperative with the Nazis between 1940-1944.

It is also a fact that over 80 000 French soldier were killed during the battle of France in summer 1940.

Yes that is a fact, of course. History repeating: some fight, some bend over. That's my point.
 

Mayhem

Banned
That's true, some of the French were very cooperative with the Nazis between 1940-1944.

It is also a fact that over 80 000 French soldier were killed during the battle of France in summer 1940.

Yes that is a fact, of course. History repeating: some fight, some bend over. That's my point.

Now wait a minute, which is a fact? You said above that France surrendered without firing a shot. Now you're agreeing that France fought against the Nazi invasion. Which fact are we going with? And since you seem to be comfortable with facts that are polar opposites, what exactly is your point again?
 
I think the preference is to always take the terrorists alive. Not because we're compassionate, but because you get no intel from a dead terrorist.
Of course, there's always the overriding practical reason that you'd rather have them dead if they're in a position to kill more innocents, rather than have to deal with the aftermath of potential victim's families when you had the killshot.

Let me pose this question for you though: Of the countries that suffered the major terrorist attacks for the last 4 months, (Canada, Australia, France), none have the death penalty. Do you think that fact goes through law enforcement's minds when they're dealing with the situation? As in: "If we catch this guy alive, he's gets to live out his life, as opposed to the innocents he's just killed. Screw that, Eye for an Eye bitch!"
 

SabrinaDeep

Official Checked Star Member
Now wait a minute, which is a fact? You said above that France surrendered without firing a shot. Now you're agreeing that France fought against the Nazi invasion. Which fact are we going with? And since you seem to be comfortable with facts that are polar opposites, what exactly is your point again?

Mayhem, please, ignore me; you can't contextualize words or anything else, for what i'm concerned, you don't know history and yet you talk about it and you are really annoying. The French government fled Paris and refused the Brits help to resist Hitler's army and not a shot was fired by the Germans to make France one of their provinces; the French government opened the door and welcomed Hitler preferring a peaceful submission to a fierce resistance, following your love them, don't fight them philosophy.
Look, forget my first sentence: i'm going to ignore you, so you can keep having fun by trolling threads.
 

Mayhem

Banned
Mayhem, please, ignore me; you can't contextualize words or anything else, for what i'm concerned, you don't know history and yet you talk about it and you are really annoying. The French government fled Paris and refused the Brits help to resist Hitler's army and not a shot was fired by the Germans to make France one of their provinces; the French government opened the door and welcomed Hitler preferring a peaceful submission to a fierce resistance, following your love them, don't fight them philosophy.
Look, forget my first sentence: i'm going to ignore you, so you can keep having fun by trolling threads.

Holding you to what you say is trolling you? Letting You Misquote, misrepresent and just make shit up is the price one has to pay to get along with you? Well, you're in the right place. There's plenty here that feel the exact same way you do. But I'm not one of them. If you can't get your story straight, then find the source that gets it straight for you.

Casualties and losses in the Battle of France
Germany: 157,621 casualties
1,876 aircraft destroyed
795 tanks destroyed

Did they all trip on a banana peel? And what "contextualization" are you using to claim "not a shot was fired"? And what in the name of Charles DeGaulle's left ass cheek does this have to do with the war against Muslim Fundamentalism? What does this have to do with your original post? If France had filmed themselves torturing and executing German soldiers, that would have kept them from being overrun?

You already blew it with me when you couldn't quote the President accurately on another thread (speaking of which, you're hardly the one who should be complaining about "context"). You don't get a free ride any more than anyone else here does. It's the feminist in me. You have the same right to get it right or get slammed, just like everyone else. If you want sycophantic devotion and slobbering agreement to everything you say, go back to your cam show.
 
Top