Tea Party Protestors (aka "Teabaggers") Attack Holocaust Survivor Elie Wiesel

[Hot Mega]

There changed it for Ft. Hood

let's spend time doing shout outs instead of dealing with what happened.

If you think a lone gunman (or two) shooting up a bunch of defenseless people (even on a base) is on par with a sitting president being notified that his country was under attack you have more serious probs Jason.

ok, i'll take you word for it about vince foster. But im not a conspiricy theorist. So if there is some nutjob theory you came up with (oh i did hear the media say something about hillary and foster being lovers, does that count as a conspiicy theory?

I guess you could take your pick of "reasons" idiots created those conspiracies about Clinton but can I deduce from your ignorance of these two most basic of conspiracies lodged against Clinton that you're trying to debate an issue for which you are utterly unprepared??

Yup awesome and babble on about our Native American meeting we just had. I think we sould waste the first 2 minutes making shout outs to those in my cabinet and senate before talking about the tragedy that struck Fort Hood.

See my response above to Jason.

 

[Hot Mega]

^Whoa! I get it now. your a true beleiver in Obama. we have freedom of religion so Ok

If religion means at least having a half a wit about something before you post...I guess so..

Anyone else notice how much more eloquent HM has gotten here recently?
Same ol' halfway true posts, just more eloquence in his prose. Wow, maybe he really is Mrs Jolly!:rofl2:

Poor Philby...SOS....can't hang in a discussion on the issues so he tries desperately to point you in another direction. It's okay Philby....we get it...:tongue:

 

[DJCowboy]

First off, they have the worst spelling ever and some seem to think Elie is a woman so there is some discrediting there. I hate both sides of the extreme on the political spectrum. They're all morons who can't listen to reason. If Limbaugh all of a sudden started praising Obama, they'd all agree with him and start doing it. If Obama started pushing the Republican political agenda, all the extremists would follow suit. All of these people can't seem to think for themselves

 

[jasonk282]

If you think a lone gunman (or two) shooting up a bunch of defenseless people (even on a base) is on par with a sitting president being notified that his country was under attack you have more serious probs Jason..

A lone gunman that is being tied to terrorist.

 

[Friday on my mind]

This thread has wandered pretty far from what the original post was about.Which was some people had said some pretty disgusting and fairly stupid (one called him a woman and many were badly challenged on spelling) things in regard to the holocaust,jews and in particular holocaust survivor and Nobel laureate Elie Wiesel.

You would think anyone of any political persuasion would not attempt to defend those comments in the slightest no matter how they felt about Obama,dems,etc.

The more you use this thread to attack Obama etc., the more it seems you are aligning youselves with the people and the comments in the OP's post.

While it may not be that important here if that is what happens ( being associated with what just about anyone would call extremist anti semitic rhetoric) to the tea bagging anti Obama movement it will be disastorous. They can and will be just dismissed as being a group of irrational extremists.I would think conservatives would see that is not in their interest and just say hey we may oppose Obama and his policys but denounce this kind of rhetoric.

They can talk all they want about Elie Wiesel he survived the Nazi's and a concentration camp:eek: so I'm sure will survive these morons.

 

[Hot Mega]

A lone gunman that is being tied to terrorist.

Operative phrase, "is (now) being tied to terrorists"....even if that is established....What then?? What should Obama's statement be??

 

[jasonk282]

Operative phrase, "is (now) being tied to terrorists"....even if that is established....What then?? What should Obama's statement be??

"let me first address the incident that accured at Ft. Hood this afternoon before we carry on with today's agenda."

 

[Mrs Jolly]

It is a constant source of amusement and frustration on this board that no end of individuals on here, when asked to supply evidence to support a statement, will ever more stridently produce evidence to bolster an unasked and unrelated question. Naturally, this becomes balls achingly boring.

Whenever I observe these debates I am reminded of Monty Python and those sketches where Cleese and Chapman would face off in hostile and contradictory interviews. To highlight the inanity of these exchanges, I give this example. If I ask you, how tall is Glenn Beck? You have not answered the question by telling me how tall Rachel Maddow is.

I beseech those on here that hold fast to this style of debate to take a look at themselves and understand that regardless of the length of such an answer or the energy expounded in producing it, if you are unable to respond to that which is clearly and simply asked of you then the strongest appearance you will give, is that of an ignorant buffoon.

 

[Facial_King]

^^^ Thanks for that, Mrs. Jolly

And as FridayOnMyMind has kindly pointed out, this thread has gone way, way, way too far off-topic (oh, and what do ya know, jasonk's involved with that!).

Can we steer it back to the original topic, please???

 

[jasonk282]

^ one man's buffoon is another's genius

 

[ballzano]

Ok, back on topic . I'm sure Elie wiesel is a real nice lady, and her neighbors all can attest to it, But Ghandi and Martin luther king beleived non-violent protest was the ulitimate! And in terms of democracy (with laws, constitutional ones) the greater good of all (AMERICANS) would be served. But i would not have voted for her, so...... why is this even a topic?

 

[CunningStunts]

Ok, back on topic . I'm sure Elie wiesel is a real nice lady, and her neighbors all can attest to it, But Ghandi and Martin luther king beleived non-violent protest was the ulitimate! And in terms of democracy (with laws, constitutional ones) the greater good of all (AMERICANS) would be served. But i would not have voted for her, so...... why is this even a topic?

Some left wing people try to talk about any topic that makes people who don't agree with their agenda look like hatemongers.

 

[ballzano]

Some left wing people try to talk about any topic that makes people who don't agree with their agenda look like hatemongers.

i wish i could rep you!

 

[Hot Mega]

Some left wing people try to talk about any topic that makes people who don't agree with their agenda look like hatemongers.

C'mon C/S....and "right wingers" don't "go after" people they disagree with to try and make them look like traitors, terrorist sympathizers, anti-American, etc.

I mean, really.....:wave2:

 

[ballzano]

C'mon C/S....and "right wingers" don't "go after" people they disagree with to try and make them look like traitors, terrorist sympathizers, anti-American, etc.

I mean, really.....:wave2:

Ohyes but the neo-coms/progrssive socialists made it an art form

 

[Hot Mega]

Ohyes but the neo-coms/progrssive socialists made it an art form

Wow...with the likes of Rush, Hannity, O'Reily, Beck, etc.....who've been doing it for years....you must be kidding ballzano...:o

 

[Philbert]

Poor Philby...SOS....can't hang in a discussion on the issues so he tries desperately to point you in another direction. It's okay Philby....we get it...:tongue:

Huh? What are you talking about?
You seem to be as coherent as your goofy sig...I assume Cletus is you.
What discussion is going on here you think I can't "hang" with...do you really think you are that deep that most people can't see how disassociated you are from any real desire to achieve any parity or consensus of opinion on anything? You're a lost soul and have a real hard time being honest about what you say. Mostly using overwordiness to diss anyone who points out your wandering logic.
You're a major poseur...and not nearly as smart as you are convinced you are. That much is easy to "get"...although why you keep setting yourself up as spokesman for anyone else but you is just weird.
Try using less flaming and see how wonderful the language can be...!:rofl:

 

[Hot Mega]

Huh? What are you talking about?
You seem to be as coherent as your goofy sig...I assume Cletus is you.
What discussion is going on here you think I can't "hang" with...do you really think you are that deep that most people can't see how disassociated you are from any real desire to achieve any parity or consensus of opinion on anything? You're a lost soul and have a real hard time being honest about what you say. Mostly using overwordiness to diss anyone who points out your wandering logic.
You're a major poseur...and not nearly as smart as you are convinced you are. That much is easy to "get"...although why you keep setting yourself up as spokesman for anyone else but you is just weird.
Try using less flaming and see how wonderful the language can be...!:rofl:

:lame::2offtopic

Again poor Philby....not a single point but a bunch of mumbo jumbo directed at a poster.....

And you say you're a :flame:...I agree....

 

[monicasilver]

It is a constant source of amusement and frustration on this board that no end of individuals on here, when asked to supply evidence to support a statement, will ever more stridently produce evidence to bolster an unasked and unrelated question. Naturally, this becomes balls achingly boring.

Whenever I observe these debates I am reminded of Monty Python and those sketches where Cleese and Chapman would face off in hostile and contradictory interviews. To highlight the inanity of these exchanges, I give this example. If I ask you, how tall is Glenn Beck? You have not answered the question by telling me how tall Rachel Maddow is.

I beseech those on here that hold fast to this style of debate to take a look at themselves and understand that regardless of the length of such an answer or the energy expounded in producing it, if you are unable to respond to that which is clearly and simply asked of you then the strongest appearance you will give, is that of an ignorant buffoon.

Those who quote CNN as a primary source are typically lazy.

 

[nightowl]

i haven't studied the american health care reform situation that much so could someone tell me why some opponents seem to bang on about the piles of bodies thing?