Syria can easily be kept in check by Israel's military ally Turkey. All they have to do is cut off water supplies. Almost all drinking water in Syria comes from rivers running through Turkey.
For Turkey to do that it needs a new pro West/pro Israel gov't. Currently it's in the hands of a quasi Islamist.
The General's need to come back and re-institute the Kemalists.
Seriously? Are we going with the premise that it hasn't been on American soil for a full generation? I suppose that 9/11 was a building demolisher showing up to the wrong address.
For Turkey to do that it needs a new pro West/pro Israel gov't. Currently it's in the hands of a quasi Islamist.
The General's need to come back and re-institute the Kemalists.
Oh you mean the Turkish Islamist Fun Bash intent on provoking Israel? Yeah well Israel had every right to kick ass in that event. The so called "peaceful" shipmates were anything but.
Turkey needs to get it's ass in gear and dump the anti Israel bull.
Oh you mean the Turkish Islamist Fun Bash intent on provoking Israel? Yeah well Israel had every right to kick ass in that event. The so called "peaceful" shipmates were anything but.
Turkey needs to get it's ass in gear and dump the anti Israel bull.
Turkey's gov't was already in the hands of the quasi Islamists when the "Peace" flotilla set sail to provoke Israel. They didn't want to improve relations with Israel.
Bring back the secularists: the Kemalists and all will be well.
58. Given the evidence at the Turkel Committee, it is clear that there was no reasonable suspicion that the Flotilla posed any military risk of itself. As a result, no case could be made for intercepting the vessels in the exercise of belligerent rights or Article 51 selfdefence.Thus, no case can be made for the legality of the interception and the Mission therefore finds that the interception was illegal. http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/15session/A.HRC.15.21_en.pdf
The so called "peaceful" shipmates were anything but.
as opposed to the heavily armed soldiers who boarded a ship uninvited in international waters at 4 in the morning? maybe they were just dropping in to borrow a cup of sugar...
58. Given the evidence at the Turkel Committee, it is clear that there was no reasonable suspicion that the Flotilla posed any military risk of itself. As a result, no case could be made for intercepting the vessels in the exercise of belligerent rights or Article 51 selfdefence.Thus, no case can be made for the legality of the interception and the Mission therefore finds that the interception was illegal. http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/15session/A.HRC.15.21_en.pdf
as opposed to the heavily armed soldiers who boarded a ship uninvited in international waters at 4 in the morning? maybe they were just dropping in to borrow a cup of sugar...